Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery.

Antimicrobials are commonly prescribed in Obstetrics and Gynaecology prophylactically for pre-operative and post-operative procedures ( 1 ) (caesarean section, episiotomy, medical termination of pregnancy, total vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy, laparoscopic procedures, tubal ligation, dilatation and curettage, and myomectomy) or to treat ongoing infection (vaginitis, pelvic inflammatory disease, endometriosis, sexually transmitted diseases and urinary tract infections). The rational use of antimicrobials in women of the child-bearing age group is important because it affects this population as well as their offspring. Indiscriminate use of antibiotics may result in the appearance of drug-resistant organisms ( 2 ). Drug utilization is defined by the WHO as ‘The marketing, distribution, prescription, and use of drugs in society, with special emphasis on the resulting medical, social, and economic consequences’. A drug utilization study is therefore one designed to describe quantitatively and qualitatively the use of a given drug, i.e., class of drugs, indications, duration of treatment, dosage, previous or associated treatments and compliance ( 3 , 4 ). Surgical site infections are a common complication of obstetric and gynaecological procedures. The use of antimicrobial prophylaxis for caesarean section has been shown to be effective in reducing postoperative morbidity, cost and duration of hospitalization ( 5 – 8 ). Antimicrobial usage in the above setting becomes inevitable but should be restricted. The judicious use of these drugs can prevent post-partum infection of the mother and neonate and reduce incidence of adverse drug reactions. The present study was performed to assess the usage of antimicrobials in 100 women undergoing caesarean section

Of 100 patients, 87% were in the age group of 20–35 years, 21% were in the age group of 20–25 years, 39% were in the age group of 26–30 years, 27% were in the age group of 31–35 years and the remaining 13% were in the age group of 36–39 years ( Fig. 1 ). The highest proportion of patients was primigravida (72%) ( Fig. 2 ). Elective C-sections were carried out in 38% of cases and the remaining were emergency C-section in whom intra- and post-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis was received for a duration of 7 days ( Fig. 3 ). Antimicrobial prophylaxis was given to all the patients, while the most commonly prescribed antimicrobial was a combination of ceftriaxone and sulbactam ( Fig. 4 ). Patients who were reported with infection even after antimicrobial prophylaxis were 27% ( Fig. 5 ). Post-partum endometritis develops usually in patients undergoing caesarean section, after labour or rupture of membranes despite the use of prophylactic antibiotics ( 9 ). Therapeutic use of antimicrobials was ‘empirical’. Patients who were reported with infection even after antimicrobial prophylaxis were 17% of which 2% were diagnosed with post-partum endometritis, 8% with wound infection and 7% with urinary tract infection ( 10 , 11 ). The patients with failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis were shifted to other regimens following empiric treatment ( Tables I and II ).

The largest number of patients in the present study was in the age group of 26–30 years. The age distribution is a reflection of the demographic status of the community as the majority of women tend to complete their families during this period. The emergency lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) group formed over 50% of the study participants. It is important to opt for elective procedures, where feasible, as it provides the opportunity to have a clean operative field ( 12 , 13 ). LSCS were performed under antimicrobial prophylaxis to avoid post-operative morbidity. This reflects that, in general, the practice in the audit setting is evidence-based. Regardless of the antibiotic regimen used, the protective effect of prophylactic antibiotics was homogeneous across all the patients undergoing caesarean section. This effect of significant reduction in postoperative infectious morbidity (by around two thirds) led the reviewers to recommend that antibiotic prophylaxis be provided to all the women undergoing caesarean section. All the patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis, which is good clinical practice and comparable to international standards of evidence-based practice worldwide. The reduction in post-operative infection-related morbidity, in turn, is cost effective as it reduces the number of days the patient has to stay in hospital. Additionally, it reduces the incidence of hospital-acquired infections and infection with more resistant microorganisms. The most frequent microbes isolated from endometrial cultures of women with post-caesarean wound infections are staphylococci, enterococci, anaerobes and ureaplasmas ( 14 – 17 ). Furthermore, when specifically identified, ureaplasma (or Mycoplasma genus) is the most common organism isolated from the amniotic fluid and chorioamnion at caesarean delivery, and is associated with a 3- to 8-fold increased risk of post-caesarean endometritis or wound infection ( 18 , 19 ). Bacterial vaginosis is also associated with an increased risk of post-caesarean endometritis. Therefore, the recommended regimen of ceftriaxone alone does not cover frequent isolates or risk factors of such infection. Thus, use of an extended spectrum regimen involving a second antibiotic metronidazole was used ( 9 , 20 , 21 ). In conclusion, antimicrobial prophylaxis was given routinely to all 100 patients undergoing caesarean section pre-operatively, intra-operatively and post-operatively. Use of prophylactic antibiotics for patients undergoing caesarean section has significantly reduced post-operative maternal infection, morbidity and hospital stay ( 22 , 23 ). Pre-operative prophylaxis was given in the early rupture of membranes. Fixed-dose combinations were used, the most common being ceftriaxone and sulbactam combination. Incidence of infection even after antimicrobial prophylaxis was reported due to pre-existing infection, debilitating disease or prolonged rupture of membranes. Patients with recurrent infection were shifted to a regime that included amoxicillin and clavulanic acid, ciprofloxacin and tinidazole combination and the duration of treatment was prolonged ( 24 ). Patients with failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis were treated following the change in antimicrobial regimen, prolonging the duration of treatment and dilatation and curettage in 2% of the patients who reported with post-partum endometritis. Drugs were prescribed only by brand names which is of concern, generic drug prescribing is recommended and would enhance cost-effectiveness. Use of certain antimicrobials (fluoroquinolones and nitro-imidazole) not recommended in lactating mothers could have been avoided. Since the patients with failure of antimicrobial prophylaxis received ‘empiric’ treatment, antibiotic culture sensitivity testing is recommended prior to introducing a change in the antimicrobial treatment regimen, to exclude antibiotic resistance.

A prospective study of 100 prescriptions of women attending the inpatient and outpatient Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, People's Hospital of Linyi (Shandong, China), a Tertiary Care Hospital during the period of February 2013 to August 2013 was conducted. Prior to start of the study Institutional Ethics Committee approval was obtained. The prescriptions were analyzed using WHO core drug use indicators including average number of drugs per encounter, percentage of drugs prescribed by generic name, percentage of drugs prescribed from the essential drug list, patient care and availability of drugs ( 4 ). The data collected were analyzed for the following para-meters: i) age of patient; ii) gravidity; iii) type of caesarean section - (elective/emergency); iv) number of drugs per prescription; v) class of antimicrobials; vi) duration of antimicrobial treatment; vii) average number of antimicrobials prescribed; viii) polypharmacy; ix) number of fixed-dose combinations prescribed; x) generic/brand name prescribed; and xi) failure of prophylaxis.