Abstract
Background: The unicornuate uterus is caused by abnormal or failed development of one Müllerian duct.
Unicornuate uteri with functioning non-communicating rudimentary horns are susceptible to many gynaecologic
and obstetric complications such as hematometra, endometriosis and ectopic pregnancy and thus surgical
resection is usually recommended..
Case presentation: We report a rare case of a unicornuate right uterus with rudimentary non-communicating
(functional) cavitary left horn (class U4a) in a 17-year-old girl who was diagnosed with VACTERL association. She
was presented to our centre with 3 years history of secondary sever dysmenorrhea. Pelvic magnetic resonance
imaging revealed a normal uterus on the right side, a 7 × 8 cm left endometrioma, a tortuous dilated fluid-filled
structure in the left hemipelvis, mostly represented left-sided hematosalpinx, and a well-defined lesion with thick
enhancing wall in the left hemipelvis measuring 6.7 × 5.7 × 5.6 cm with a similar enhancement to the uterus in the
right. She underwent laparotomy that showed a right unicornuate uterus with a normal cervix and a rudimentary
non-communicating distended left horn. In addition, there was a left endometrioma and left hematosalpinx.
Resection of the left communicating horn, left salpingectomy and left ovarian cystectomy were performed. The
right tube and both ovaries were preserved. At 9-months follow up, the patient had a regular period and the pain
subsided completely.
Conclusion
We report yet the second case of VACTERL association and unicornuate uterus with non-
communicating functional rudimentary horn, in hope of expanding the knowledge of a rare occurrence. This case
also highlights the importance of considering the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies in patients with a history
of other anomalies, and/or history of early-age secondary dysmenorrhea.
Keywords
Imperforate anus, Müllerian duct, Secondary dysmenorrhea, Unicornuate uterus, VACTERL association
Background
The true incidence of Müllerian duct anomalies (MDAs) are
believed to be between 0.1 and 3.8% [ 1]. Although its inci-
dence may be as high as 25% in women with recurrent mis-
carriages and subfertility [2]. MDAs are congenital anatomic
abnormalities of the female genital tract that arise from non-
development or nonfusion of the Müllerian ducts or failed
resorption of the uterine septum [3, 4]. MDAs may lead to
symptoms such as pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, abnormal
bleeding at the time of menarche, recurrent pregnancy loss,
and/or premature delivery [4]. Patients with MDAs are at in-
creased risk of having renal, skeletal, or abdominal wall ab-
normalities [5]; these abnormalities should also be identified
and documented.
The European Society of Human Reproduction and Em-
bryology (ESHRE) and the European Society for Gynaeco-
logical Endoscopy (ESGE) classification system for female
genital malformations organizes uterine anomalies into six
© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
* Correspondence:
[email protected];
[email protected]
1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan
University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan
Full list of author information is available at the end of the article
Obeidat et al. BMC Women's Health (2019) 19:71
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-019-0768-4
main classes: Class U0 involves all cases with a normal
uterus. Class U1 or dysmorphic uterus incorporates all
cases with a normal uterine outline but with an abnormal
shape endometrial cavity excluding septa. Septate uterus is
the class U2 anomaly. Class U3 or bicorporeal uterus
comprises all cases of fusion defects. Class U4 or
hemi-uterus includes all cases of the unilateral formed
uterus. Class U5 or aplastic uterus incorporates all cases
of uterine aplasia. Class U6 is kept for still unclassified
cases. Cervical and vaginal anomalies are classified in in-
dependent supplementary sub-classes [6].
We report a rare case of a unicornuate right uterus with
rudimentary non-communicating (functional) cavitary left
horn (class U4a) in link with (Vertebral defects, Anal atresia,
Cardiac defects, Tracheo-Esophageal fistula, Renal anomalies,
and Limb abnormalities) VACTERL association.
Case presentation
A 17-year-old girl; a known case of a repaired high im-
perforate anus, repaired type-C tracheoesophageal mal-
formation, and left renal agenesis; presented to King
Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) complaining of
dysmenorrhea for 3 years duration. She was 14-year-old
when she had her menarche. The menstrual cycle was ir-
regular and associated with severe dysmenorrhea. She had
the dysmenorrhea 4 days before the period, during the period
and lasted 1 week after. The pain was slightly relieved by an-
algesics. The complaint was associated with vomiting, an-
orexia, and general fatigability. Prior medical and surgical
history included two-steps primary anoplasty repair for im-
perforate anus which involved a temporary colostomy cre-
ation followed by posterior sagittal anorectoplasty. The
tracheoesophageal fistula was repaired by resection of the fis-
tula and anastomosis of the esophageal limbs. Examination
revealed abdominal mass and tenderness.
Laboratory investigations were conducted and revealed el-
evated levels of cancer antigen 125 (CA 125) (241 U/ml) and
CA 19 –9 (67 U/ml). Other tests including complete blood
count, kidney function test, CA 15.3, alpha-fetoprotein, lac-
tate dehydrogenase, and human chorionic gonadotropin
(hCG) were all within normal levels. Also, urinalysis and cul-
ture disclosed no abnormalities.
Abdominal and pelvic ultrasound was performed and
showed a thick-wall left pelvic mass measuring 6 × 6 cm
and another 7 × 8 cm left pelvic mass mostly endome-
trioma. Renal ultrasound confirmed the solitary right
kidney with compensatory hypertrophy. Pelvic magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a normal uterus on
the right side, a normal right ovary, a 7 × 8 cm left endo-
metrioma, a tortuous dilated fluid-filled structure in the
left hemipelvis mostly represented left-sided hematosal-
pinx, and a well-defined lesion with thick enhancing wall
in the left hemipelvis measuring 6.7 × 5.7 × 5.6 cm with
similar enhancement to the uterus in the right
suggestive of MDA probably double uterus obstructed
on the left side with large hematometra. (Figs. 1 and 2).
Initially the patient had diagn ostic laparoscopy using the
open technique, however, the patient had extensive adhe-
sions and thus laparotomy with adhesiolysis was performed.
At laparotomy, there was a right unicornuate uterus with a
normal cervix and a non-communicating distended left rudi-
mentary horn. Additionally, there was a left hematosalpinx
of the left tube which was connected to the left horn, and a
left endometrioma. The right ovary and tube looked normal.
The single right ureter was also identified. The left
non-communicating horn was resected. In addition, left sal-
pingectomy and left ovarian cystectomy were performed.
The right uterus and both ovaries were preserved. The diag-
nosis of class U4a uterine anomaly (unicornuate right uterus
with rudimentary non-communicating cavitary left horn)
was established (Fig. 3). No intraoperative or immediate
postoperative complications were detected. The patient was
discharged on the fourth posto perative day. Histopatho-
logical examination of the specimen was reported as uterine
rudimentary horn with unremarkable myometrium and
secretory endometrium, and left endometriotic cyst. At 9
months follow up, the patient had regular menstrual cycles
and the pain subsided completely.
Discussion
and conclusion
In embryological development, the Müllerian (or parameso-
nephric) ducts are first identifiable at 5 –6 weeks gestation
when they begin to grow mediocaudally toward the urogeni-
tal sinus. The cranial vertical part and the mid horizontal
part of each duct develop into fimbria and fallopian tube
while the caudal part of the duct conjoins in the midlines
with its contralateral side to create uterovaginal canal that
will develop to the uterus, cervix, and upper vagina. Initially,
the two Müllerian ducts are composed of solid tissue, and
then internal canalization of each duct produces two canals
separated by a septum that is usually regressed at around 20
weeks. The uterine endometrium is derived from the lining
Fig. 1 Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging: T2 signal magnetic
resonance imaging indicated the presence of left hematometra with
small right uterus. Both ovaries were demonstrated
Obeidat et al. BMC Women's Health (2019) 19:71 Page 2 of 5
of the fused Müllerian ducts, whereas the endometrial
stroma and myometrium are derived from adjacent mesen-
chyme [7–9].
Embryologically, the urinary system and the genital system
are closely linked. Both develop from the intermediate meso-
derm along the posterior wall of the abdominal cavity, and ini-
tially, the excretory ducts of both systems enter a common
cavity, the cloaca. Three slightly overlapping kidney systems
are formed in a cranial-to-caudal sequence during intrauterine
life in humans: the pronephros and mesonephros which are
transitory structures but critical to the development of the
metanephros. The paired mesonephric ducts drain the meso-
nephros into the cloaca and are necessary for lower vaginal
formation. The permanent kidneys develop from two sources;
the ureteric bud and the metanephrogenic blastema. The ur-
eteric bud is a diverticulum from the mesonephric duct near
its entrance into the cloaca and it is the primordium of the ur-
eter, renal pelvis, calices, and collecting tubules [7, 9].
During the fourth to seventh weeks of development,
the cloaca divides into the urogenital sinus anteriorly
and the anal canal posteriorly. The urogenital sinus gives
rise to lower vagina, bladder (except trigon) and urethra.
The trigone is derived from the caudal ends of the meso-
nephric ducts. The ovaries develop from primitive germ
cells, mesothelium of the posterior abdominal wall and
adjacent mesenchyme and are independent of Müllerian
duct differentiation. Therefore, the ovaries are usually
normal in a patient with MDAs [ 7–9].
The unicornuate uterus (Class U4) is a result of abnor-
mal or failed development of one Müllerian duct. It ac-
counts for approximately 2.4 –13% of all Müllerian
anomalies [10] and is divided into two sub-classes depend-
ing on the presence or not of a functional rudimentary
cavity. Class U4a or hemi-uterus with a rudimentary
(functional) cavity characterized by the presence of a com-
municating or non-communicating functional contralat-
eral horn. Class U4b or hemi-uterus without rudimentary
(functional) cavity characterized either by the presence of
non-functional contralateral uterine horn or by aplasia of
the contralateral part [6].
Clinically, non-communicating rudimentary horns with
functional endometrium are the most significant subtype.
The correct diagnosis of this entity has important clinical
implications as they are likely to be associated with dys-
menorrhea and pelvic pain from haematometra or from
endometriosis due to retrograde menstruation [ 11]. Fur-
thermore, pregnancies in these rudimentary horns can
occur following transperitoneal migration of sperm or
zygote and generally will result in a life-threatening uter-
ine rupture [ 12]. Whenever diagnosed, surgical excision
(preferably laparoscopic) of the functional rudimentary
horn is recommended even if the horn is communicating.
The acronym VATER association was first described
by Quan which followed by the acronym VACTERL de-
scribed by Baumann [ 13, 14]. This association comprises
a group of birth defects which tend to co-occur. These
defects are vertebral anomalies, anorectal malformations,
cardiovascular anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistula,
esophageal atresia, renal anomalies, and limb defects
[13, 14]. The presence of at least three of the aforemen-
tioned anomalies is diagnostic for VACTERL association
[14]. In the presenting case, the patient was born with
imperforate anus, tracheoesophageal fistula, esophageal
atresia, and left renal agenesis.
Fig. 2 Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging: T2 signal magnetic
resonance imaging indicated the presence of left endometrioma
above the hematometra
Fig. 3 a, b, c Intraoperative findings of large congested left rudimentary non-communicating cavitary horn with right unicornuate uterus
Obeidat et al. BMC Women's Health (2019) 19:71 Page 3 of 5
To our knowledge, this is the second documented case
describes a VACTERL association with the coexistence
of unicornuate uterus with a non-communicating rudi-
mentary functional horn. Nunes et al. reported the first
case in a 28-year-old nullipara female known to have a
missing vertebra, imperforate anus, anovaginal fistula,
right renal agenesis, and an extra digit on one hand [ 5].
She had a regular cycle since menarche at age 15. She
presented with a 6-month history of progressive consti-
pation and sciatica followed by acute urinary retention
which was revealed to be due to hematometra/hemato-
salpinx of a non-communicating right uterine horn and
fallopian tube [ 5]. Jessel et al. described a case of distal
vaginal agenesis and right unicornuate uterus with left
non-obstructed rudimentary horn in a 14-year-old girl
with a known history of VACTERL association and
repaired imperforate anus [ 15].
Heinonen reported no VACTERL association in his series
with 42 cases of unicornuate uteri [ 16]. Heinonen reported
t h ep r e s e n c eo fK i d n e ya b n o r m alities, bony anomalies, audi-
tory defect, Hirschsprung’s disease, an absence of the gall-
bladder, and annular pancreas [16].
To finish, the development of the urinary system is closely
related to the genital tract and anomalies of these organs are
often coexisting. Less commonly, MDAs may coexist with
developmental anomalies of the distal gastrointestinal tract
particularly cloaca anomaly [17]. A retrospective study of fe-
male patients treated for imperforate anus revealed that pri-
m a r yv a g i n a la n o m a l i e so c c u r r e di n2 2o f7 2( 3 2 % )p a t i e n t s
assessed, and uterine anomalies occurred in 18 of 51 (35%)
patients assessed. A bicornuate uterus and uterus didelphys
were the most common abnormalities [18]. In our case, and
the case described by Nunes et al., the patients had a unicor-
nuate uterus with rudimentary horn and the diagnosis of
MDAs was not recognized until they develop symptoms
later. Hence, it is important that an experienced gynaecolo-
gist is involved at an early stage in the care of female infants
with anorectal malformations.
We report yet the second case of VACTERL association
and a unicornuate uterus with non-communicating func-
tional rudimentary horn, in hope of expanding the know-
ledge of a rare occurrence. This case also highlights the
importance of considering the diagnosis of MDAs in patients
with a history of other anomalies, and/or history of early-age
secondary dysmenorrhea.
Abbreviations
CA: cancer antigen; MDAs: Müllerian duct anomalies; VACTERL: Vertebral
defects, Anal atresia, Cardiac defects, Tracheo-Esophageal fistula, Renal anom-
alies, and Limb abnormalities
Acknowledgments
Not applicable.
Funding
Not applicable.
Availability of data and materials
Data sharing does not apply to this article as no datasets were generated or
analyzed during the current study.
Authors’ contributions
RO: performed diagnosis, clinical follow-up, therapeutic management, critical
revision of the manuscript for intellectual content. AA, NT, and HA: designed
the Manuscript, added critical revision for intellectual content and analyze
the figures. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient ’s parent for
publication of this Case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the
written consent is available for review by the Editor of this journal .
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Publisher’sN o t e
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in
published maps and institutional affiliations.
Author details
1Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan
University of Science & Technology, Irbid, Jordan. 2Department of General
Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science & Technology,
Irbid, Jordan. 3Department Pediatrics and Neonatology, Faculty of Medicine,
Jordan University of Science & Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Received: 9 January 2019 Accepted: 14 May 2019
References
1. Gidwani G, Falcone T. Congenital malformations of the female genital tract:
diagnosis and management. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 1999.
2. Saravelos SH, Cocksedge KA, Li T-C. Prevalence and diagnosis of congenital
uterine anomalies in women with reproductive failure: a critical appraisal.
Hum Reprod Update. 2008;14(5):415 –29.
3. Nahum GG. Uterine anomalies. How common are they, and what is their
distribution among subtypes? The Journal of reproductive medicine. 1998;
43(10):877–87.
4. Stampe SS. Estimated prevalence of müllerian anomalies. Acta Obstet
Gynecol Scand. 1988;67(5):441 –5.
5. Nunes N, Karandikar S, Cooper S, Jaganat han R, Irani S. VATER/VACTERL syndrome
(vertebra/anus/cardiac/trachea/esophogus/radius/renal/limb anomalies) with a
noncommunicating functioning uterine horn and a unicornuate uterus: a case
report. Fertility and sterility. 2009;91(5):1957. e1911–2.
6. Grimbizis GF, Gordts S, Di Spiezio Sardo A, et al. The ESHRE/ESGE consensus
on the classification of female genital tract congenital anomalies. Hum
Reprod. 2013;28(8):2032–44.
7. Sadler TW. Langman ’s medical embryology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams
& Wilkins; 2011.
8. Robboy SJ, Taguchi O, Cunha GR. Normal development of the human
female reproductive tract and alterations resulting from experimental
exposure to diethylstilbestrol. Hum Pathol. 1982;13(3):190 –8.
9. Moore KL, Persaud TVN, Torchia MG. Before we are born: essentials of
embryology and birth defects. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.
10. Grimbizis GF, Camus M, Tarlatzis BC, Bontis JN, Devroey P. Clinical
implications of uterine malformations and hysteroscopic treatment results.
Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(2):161 –74.
11. Markham SM, Waterhouse TB. Structural anomalies of the reproductive tract.
Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology. 1992;4(6):867-873.
12. Kadir R, Hart J, Nagele F, O'Connor H, Magos A. Laparoscopic excision of a
noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol.
1996;103(4):371–2.
13. Quan L, Smith DW. The VATER association:-vertebral defects,-anal atresia,-T-
Efistula with esophageal atresia,-radial and-renal dysplasia: a spectrum of
associated defects. J Pediatr. 1973;82(1):104 –7.
Obeidat et al. BMC Women's Health (2019) 19:71 Page 4 of 5
14. Baumann W, Greinacher I, Emmrich P, Spranger J. Vater or vacterl syndrome
(author's transl). Klinische Padiatrie. 1976;188(4):328 –37.
15. Jessel RH, Laufer MR. Management of lower vaginal agenesis in a patient
with unicornuate uterus. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013;26(1):e21 –3.
16. Heinonen PK. Unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn. Fertil Steril. 1997;
68(2):224–30.
17. Pradhan S, Vilanova-Sanchez A, McCracken KA, et al. The Mullerian black
box: predicting and defining Mullerian anatomy in patients with cloacal
abnormalities and the need for longitudinal assessment. J Pediatr Surg.
2018;53(11):2164–9.
18. Hall R, Fleming S, Gysler M, McLorie G. The genital tract in female children
with imperforate anus. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1985;151(2):169 –71.
Obeidat et al. BMC Women's Health (2019) 19:71 Page 5 of 5