Maternal body mass index is not associated with assisted reproductive technology outcomes.

The characteristics of the confounding factors in oocyte retrieval are shown in Table 1 . Multiple regression analysis of IVF showed that only male factor infertility was associated with a normal fertilization rate. Meanwhile, maternal age and the first cycle in oocyte retrieval were associated with a high-grade blastocyst rate. BMI was not associated with normal fertilization or high-grade blastocyst rate (Table 2 ). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), maternal age, first cycle in oocyte retrieval, and delivery history were associated with the normal fertilization rate. Maternal age and the first cycle in oocyte retrieval were also associated with the high-grade blastocyst rate. The univariate analysis of ICSI showed significant differences in normal fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rates with increasing maternal BMI. However, after controlling for significant confounders, BMI did not significantly predict normal fertilization or high-grade blastocyst rates (Table 2 ). Table 1 Population characteristics in oocyte retrieval. Body Mass Index (kg/m 2 )  < 18.5 18.5–20.0 20.0–22.5 22.5–25.0  ≥ 25.0 n = 2039 n = 3654 n = 5235 n = 2476 n = 1201 P -values a Maternal age, year, median 38.0 39.0 40.0 40.0 41.0  < 0.001 (IQR) (31.0–45.0) (33.0–45.0) (34.0–46.0) (34.0–46.0) (37.0–45.0) First cycle in oocyte retrieval (%) 979 (48.0) 1536 (42.0) 2010 (38.4) 831 (33.5) 362 (30.1) History of delivery (%) 2039 (27.3) 961 (26.3) 1324 (25.2) 586 (23.6) 223 (18.5)  < 0.001 History of miscarriage (%)   ≥ 1 506 (24.8) 1168 (31.9) 1699 (32.4) 868 (35.0) 365 (30.3)  < 0.001   ≥ 2 114 (5.5) 365 (9.9) 430 (8.2) 213 (8.6) 107 (8.9)  < 0.001 Endometriosis (%) 158 (7.7) 287 (7.8) 303 (5.7) 117 (4.7) 83 (6.9)  < 0.001 Male factor infertility b 1168 (57.2) 2195 (60.0) 3253 (62.1) 1565 (63.2) 813 (67.6)  < 0.001 AMH, ng/ml, median 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.0  < 0.001 (IQR) (0.1–3.8) (0.1–3.5) (0.1–3.5) (0.1–3.3) (0.1–2.8) IQR interquartile range, AMH anti-Mullerian hormone. a P- values calculated with the used of chi–square tests for categoric variables and Kruskal–Wallis tests for maternal age. b Sperm parameters are less than WHO2010: volume 1.5 mL, total sperm number 39 million per ejaculate, sperm concentration 15 million per mL, total motility 40%, morphologically normal forms 4.0%. Table 2 Effect of each characteristics on fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rate in IVF and ICSI by multiple regression analysis. IVF ICSI Normal fertilization rate High-grade blastocyst rate a Normal fertilization rate High-grade blastocyst rate a β P- values β P- values β P- values β P -values BMI 0.007 0.579 0.008 0.587  − 0.007 0.506  − 0.001 0.908 Maternal age 0.028 0.098  − 0.148  < 0.001  − 0.037 0.010  − 0.206  < 0001 First cycle in oocyte retrieval 0.010 0.881 0.060  < 0.001 0.030 0.014 0.066  < 0.001 History of delivery 0.010 0.438  − 0.007 0.642 0.029 0.007 0.003 0.785 History of miscarriage   ≥ 1 0.002 0.910 0.012 0.455  − 0.004 0.738 0.006 0.659   ≥ 2 0.027 0.068 0.020 0.205 0.011 0.325 0.007 0.509 Endometriosis  − 0.003 0.829 0.017 0.239 0.012 0.274  − 0.010 0.364 Male factor infertility a  − 0.075  < 0.001 0.001 0.944  − 0.005 0.613  − 0.015 0.179 AMH  − 0.012 0.395  < 0.001 0.979 0.015 0.227  − 0.004 0.758 IVF in vitro fertilization, ICSI intracytoplasmic sperm injection, β standardized partial regression coefficient, BMI: body mass index, AMH: anti-Mullerian hormone. a Gardner Schoolcraft criteria of ≥ 3BB. b Sperm parameters are less than WHO2010: volume 1.5 mL, total sperm number 39 million per ejaculate, sperm concentration 15 million per mL, total motility 40%, morphologically normal forms 4.0%. Population characteristics in oocyte retrieval. IQR interquartile range, AMH anti-Mullerian hormone. a P- values calculated with the used of chi–square tests for categoric variables and Kruskal–Wallis tests for maternal age. b Sperm parameters are less than WHO2010: volume 1.5 mL, total sperm number 39 million per ejaculate, sperm concentration 15 million per mL, total motility 40%, morphologically normal forms 4.0%. Effect of each characteristics on fertilization and high-grade blastocyst rate in IVF and ICSI by multiple regression analysis. IVF in vitro fertilization, ICSI intracytoplasmic sperm injection, β standardized partial regression coefficient, BMI: body mass index, AMH: anti-Mullerian hormone. a Gardner Schoolcraft criteria of ≥ 3BB. b Sperm parameters are less than WHO2010: volume 1.5 mL, total sperm number 39 million per ejaculate, sperm concentration 15 million per mL, total motility 40%, morphologically normal forms 4.0%. The characteristics of the confounding factors in FET are shown in Table 3 . Logistic regression analysis in FET showed that maternal age, first cycle in FET, history of delivery, history of miscarriage, and day 5 blastocyst transfer were associated with clinical pregnancy. Meanwhile, maternal age, first cycle in FET, history of delivery, history of recurrent miscarriage, day 5 blastocyst transfer, and uterine factor infertility were associated with miscarriage. Maternal age, first cycle in FET, history of delivery, history of miscarriage, and day 5 blastocyst transfer were associated with live birth (Table 4 ). The Chi-square test showed no significant difference in the miscarriage rate among the five BMI groups ( P  = 0.193). However, there was a significant difference in the clinical pregnancy and live birth rate ( P  = 0.014, and P  = 0.001, respectively). Following residual analysis, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower for BMI ≥ 25 than for other groups (adjusted standardized residual (Rad) =  − 2.7). In addition, live birth rates were significantly higher in BMI < 18.5 (Rad = 3.0) and significantly lower in BMI ≥ 25 (Rad =  − 3.1). However, after PS matching, no significant differences were observed (Clinical pregnancy: P  = 0.313, Miscarriage: P  = 0.268, Live birth: P  = 0.578) (Table 5 ). In clinical pregnancy, the covariates included the first cycle in FET, maternal age, delivery history, and day 5 embryo transfer. After PS matching, 6,022 cycles were enrolled in the analysis. Meanwhile, in miscarriage, the covariates included first cycle in FET, maternal age, delivery history, history of recurrent miscarriage, day 5 blastocyst transfer, and uterine factor infertility. After PS matching, 1,846 cycles were enrolled in the analysis. In the live birth rate, the covariates included the first cycle in FET, maternal age, history of delivery, history of miscarriage, and day 5 blastocyst transfer. After PS matching, 5,428 cycles were enrolled in the analysis. Table 3 Population characteristics in highest-grade embryo transfer a . Body Mass Index (kg/m 2 )  < 18.5 18.5–20.0 20.0–22.5 22.5–25.0  ≥ 25.0 n = 1154 n = 1852 n = 2645 n = 1092 n = 379 P- values b Maternal age, year, median 36.0 36.0 37.0 37.0 38.0  < 0.001 (IQR) (29.0–43.0) (30.0–42.0) (31.0–43.0) (31.0–43.0) (32.0–44.0) First cycle in FET (%) 547 (47.4) 830 (44.8) 1147 (43.3) 468 (42.8) 154 (40.6) 0.073 History of delivery (%) 372 (32.2) 580 (31.3) 790 (29.8) 304 (27.8) 74 (19.5)  < 0.001 History of miscarriage (%)   ≥ 1 393 (34.0) 687 (37.1) 1063 (40.1) 443 (40.5) 155 (40.9) 0.002   ≥ 2 72 (6.2) 212 (11.4) 340 (12.8) 141 (12.9) 42 (11.0)  < 0.001 No. of embryos transferred c (%)  1 1152 (99.8) 1849 (99.8) 2639 (99.7) 1089 (99.7) 378 (99.7) 0.965  2 2 (0.1) 3 (0.1) 6 (0.2) 3 (0.2) 1 (0.2) 0.965 Day 5 blastocyst transfer d (%) 1024 (88.8) 1572 (84.8) 2261 (85.4) 929 (85.0) 324 (85.4) 0.031 Uterine factor infertility 5 (0.4) 15 (0.8) 10 (0.3) 4 (0.3) 2 (0.5) 0.307 IQR interquartile range, FET frozen-thawed embryo transfer. a Gardner Schoolcraft criteria of ≥ 3AA. b P- values calculated with the used of chi–square tests for categoric variables and Kruskal–Wallis tests for maternal age. c No. of single embryo transfer or double embryo transfer/total No. of FET. d No. of Day 5 embryo transfer/total No. of FET. Table 4 Effect of each characteristics on clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rate in FET by Logistic regression analysis. Clinical pregnancy Miscarriage Live birth OR 95% CI P- values OR 95% CI P -values OR 95% CI P- values Maternal age, year, median 0.892 0.881–0.903  < 0.001 1.150 1.126–1.175  < 0.001 0.873 0.862–0.885  < 0.001 First cycle in FET 1.340 1.211–1.483  < 0.001 0.766 0.650–0.903 0.001 1.317 1.184–1.465  < 0.001 History of delivery 1.262 1.132–1.407  < 0.001 0.837 0.705–0.993 0.042 1.290 1.152–1.445  < 0.001 History of miscarriage   ≥ 1 0.592 0.536–0.654  < 0.001 0.983 0.817–1.183 0.857 0.694 0.623–0.773  < 0.001   ≥ 2 0.555 0.476–0.647  < 0.001 1.597 1.205–2.116 0.001 0.686 0.564–0.834  < 0.01 Double embryos transfer 1.293 0.448–3.732 0.634 1.129 0.244–5.213 0.877 1.036 0.324–3.316 0.952 Day 5 blastocyst transfer a 1.550 1.346–1.785  < 0.001 0.639 0.508–0.804  < 0.001 1.779 1.518–2.085  < 0.001 Uterine factor infertility 1.381 0.688–2.771 0.364 2.812 1.187–6.660 0.019 0.815 0.398–1.667 0.575 OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, FET frozen-thawed embryo transfer. a Day 7 blastocyst 20 cycle were excluded. Table 5 Effect of BMI on clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rate in FET with highest-grade embryo transfer a after PS matching. BMI five groups (kg/m 2 ) Original After PS matching Number Rate (%) P -values b Rad Number Rate (%) P- values b Clinical pregnancy   < 18.5 1154 56.4 0.014 1.8 943 50.7 0.313  18.5–20.0 1852 55.0 1.0 1566 50.4  20.0–22.5 2645 52.8  − 1.5 2248 48.8  22.5–25.0 1092 54.9 0.6 935 52.2   ≥ 25 379 47.2  − 2.7 330 46.9 Total 7122 6022 Miscarriage d   < 18.5 648 21.2 0.193 283 48.4 0.268  18.5–20.0 1002 24.6 486 50.6  20.0–22.5 1381 24.9 670 50.7  22.5–25.0 590 25.4 323 46.4   ≥ 25 175 29.1 84 59.5 Total 3796 c 1846 Live birth e   < 18.5 1153 44.2 0.001 3.0 918 51.7 0.578  18.5–20.0 1847 40.8 0.6 1440 49.5  20.0–22.5 2640 39.2  − 1.5 2010 49.0  22.5–25.0 1087 40.4 0.1 815 51.5   ≥ 25 378 32.8  − 3.1 245 48.9 Total 7105 c 5428 BMI body mass index, FET frozen-thawed embryo transfer, PS propensity score, Rad adjusted standardized residual. a Gardner Schoolcraft criteria of ≥ 3AA. b P -values calculated with the used of chi-square tests. If there were significant differences, residual analysis was then performed. c Seventeen cycles with unknown outcome after pregnancy were excluded. d Including stillbirth. e Live birth rate was calculated from the number of live births/number of patients. Population characteristics in highest-grade embryo transfer a . IQR interquartile range, FET frozen-thawed embryo transfer. a Gardner Schoolcraft criteria of ≥ 3AA. b P- values calculated with the used of chi–square tests for categoric variables and Kruskal–Wallis tests for maternal age. c No. of single embryo transfer or double embryo transfer/total No. of FET. d No. of Day 5 embryo transfer/total No. of FET. Effect of each characteristics on clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rate in FET by Logistic regression analysis. OR odds ratio, 95% CI 95% confidence interval, FET frozen-thawed embryo transfer. a Day 7 blastocyst 20 cycle were excluded. Effect of BMI on clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rate in FET with highest-grade embryo transfer a after PS matching. BMI body mass index, FET frozen-thawed embryo transfer, PS propensity score, Rad adjusted standardized residual. a Gardner Schoolcraft criteria of ≥ 3AA. b P -values calculated with the used of chi-square tests. If there were significant differences, residual analysis was then performed. c Seventeen cycles with unknown outcome after pregnancy were excluded. d Including stillbirth. e Live birth rate was calculated from the number of live births/number of patients.

Following the World Health Organization guidelines, we divided BMI into five groups (< 18.5, 18.5–20.0, 20.0–22.5, 22.5–25.0, and ≥ 25.0 kg/m 2 ). The normal fertilization and high-quality blastocyst (Gardner Schoolcraft criteria of ≥ 3BB) 19 rates among the BMI groups in 14,605 oocyte retrieval cycles performed at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020 were investigated. BMI was calculated by dividing the weight in kilograms by the square of the height in meters (kg/m 2 ). Among the BMI groups mentioned above, we investigated the 7,122 cycles with the highest-grade embryo (Gardner Schoolcraft criteria of ≥ 3AA) in the 13,301 cycles of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) at our hospital during the same period. Maternal weight was measured before oocyte retrieval and FET. Furthermore, maternal height was reported in the questionnaire and used to calculate BMI. The outcome measures were the normal fertilization and high-quality blastocyst rates in oocyte retrieval, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rate in FET. In this study, ultrasound confirmation of the presence of the gestational sac was defined as clinical pregnancy; stillbirths after 22 weeks of gestational age were considered miscarriages. All procedures were conducted in compliance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national), the 1964 Helsinki Declaration, and its later amendments. The Clinical Ethics Committee of Denentoshi Ladies Clinic approved this retrospective study (20071604). Informed consent was obtained from all the participants. Ovarian stimulation was performed on the 3rd day of menstruation. For this, clomiphene citrate was prescribed at 50 mg/day and used with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone and human menopausal gonadotropin unless the antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone levels showed poor ovarian reserve. Clomiphene citrate alone was administered when the ovarian reserve was low. Furthermore, oocyte retrieval was performed 35 to 37 h after administering recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin hormone (Ovidrel, EMD Serono, Switzerland) or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (Buserecur, Fuji Parma, Japan) when one or more ovarian follicles reached ≥ 18 mm in diameter on ultrasound examination. Spermatozoa were obtained using density gradient centrifugation, and a universal in vitro fertilization (IVF) medium with phenol red (Origio, Japan) was used as the fertilization medium. The insemination concentration was set at 1.0–1.5 × 10 5 /ml. After dropping the sample into the Makler chamber, spermatozoa were analyzed using a sperm motility analysis system (SMAS, DITECT, Japan). Embryos were exposed to a global total medium (Astec, Japan). Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed using standard techniques. Fertilization was evaluated 18–19 h after IVF or ICSI; it was considered normal when two distinct pronuclei were evident. Embryos were assessed using a stereoscope (Olympus SZX16; Olympus Corporation, Shinjuku, Japan), and the following parameters were recorded: morphological classification (Gardner Schoolcraft criteria) of the inner cell mass, trophectoderm morphology, and cavity expansion. Cryopreservation of embryos was performed using a vitrification kit. In addition, FET was performed using the hormone replacement cycle or natural cycle. The transfer date for blastocysts was 5 days after ovulation or 5 days after the start of luteal support. In contrast, the transfer date for the cleavage stage was 3 days after ovulation or 3 days after the start of luteal support. In the hormone replacement cycle FET, estradiol administration usually starts on the 3rd day of the menstrual period. When the endometrial thickness was ≥ 7 mm on the 11th to 19th day of the menstrual period, luteal support was initiated and continued until the 9th week of gestation. In the natural cycle FET, a progesterone concentration of ≥ 1.00 ng/mL was defined as ovulation. From the 3rd day after ovulation to the 4th week of gestation, a progesterone vaginal suppository was used. A thawing medium (KITAZATO BioPharma, Japan) was used for embryo thawing. If an appropriately increasing serum human chorionic gonadotrophin level was encountered, transvaginal ultrasound was performed at 5–6 weeks of gestation to determine the presence of a gestational sac, indicating clinical pregnancy. Based on questionnaires obtained for all patients, the delivery procedure, complications, gestational age, infant's weight, and sex were investigated. Multiple regression analysis was used to calculate the standardized partial regression coefficient (β) and P-value by adjusting for maternal age, first cycle in oocyte retrieval, history of delivery or miscarriage, endometriosis, male factor infertility, and anti-Mullerian hormone to investigate the effect of BMI on normal fertilization rate and high-grade blastocyst rate. Cases with sperm parameters less than the WHO 2010 definition (volume 1.5 mL, total sperm number 39 million per ejaculate, sperm concentration 15 million per mL, total motility 40%, morphologically normal forms 4.0%) were considered male factor infertility 20 . The nominal scale was used as a dummy variable. We also confirmed that all the variance inflation factors were < 10 for multicollinearity. Residuals and outliers were examined using the Durbin–Watson test. In addition, a multivariate logistic regression model was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the effect of BMI on pregnancy outcomes in FET with propensity score (PS) matching. The PS model was estimated using a logistic regression model adjusted for potential confounding covariates such as maternal age, first cycle in oocyte FET, history of delivery, history of miscarriage, double embryo transfer, day 5 blastocyst transfer, and uterine factor infertility. The PS was matched using the nearest-neighbor algorithm with a caliper width of 0.2 logits of the standard deviation. The P -value was calculated using chi-square tests among five BMI groups for clinical pregnancy, delivery, and miscarriage. If there were significant differences, residual analysis was then performed. Confounding factors were selected based on previous studies 8 , 15 . Difference s between the five BMI groups for the population characteristics in oocyte retrieval and FET were calculated using chi-square tests for categorical variables and Kruskal–Wallis tests for maternal age. Statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS version 26.0 software (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). To evaluate the normal distribution, the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test was used. The results are expressed as the median, interquartile range (IQR), 95% CI, and P -values. Statistical significance was set at P  < 0.05 for all tests.

This study identified no significant differences between the five BMI groups for normal fertilization, high-grade blastocyst, clinical pregnancy, live birth, and miscarriage rate in FET. Therefore, BMI may not adequately predict ART outcomes. According to a previous report, endocrine changes related to obesity, such as hyperandrogenism and insulin resistance, and alterations in local insulin-like growth factors, cytokines, adiponectin, and leptin levels, may play a major role in the adverse effects of increased BMI on ART outcomes 10 . However, based on our results, these factors may act independently of BMI. Previous reports have shown that the impact of BMI on ART outcomes remains controversial. For all fresh autologous IVF cycles in the United States between 2008 and 2013, Kawwass et al. reported that underweight women (BMI < 18.5), compared with normal-weight women (BMI 18.5–24.9), had a statistically significant decrease in the chance of intrauterine pregnancy (95% CI 0.96–0.99) and live birth (95% CI 0.93–0.98) per transfer. Women with obesity (BMI ≥ 30.0) had a statistically decreased likelihood of intrauterine pregnancy and live birth (95% CI 0.94–0.95; 95% CI 0.86–0.88, respectively). In addition, obesity was associated with a statistically significant increase in miscarriage risk (95% CI 1.20–1.26) 8 . Similarly, Nogales et al. 15 and Zhang et al. 21 reported a significant relationship between BMI and miscarriage rates. Meanwhile, Kudesia et al. conducted a retrospective cohort study that included 51,198 women who initiated their first-fresh autologous IVF or ICSI cycle at 13 fertility centers in the USA between 2009 and 2015 11 . They reported that a BMI above the normal range was an independent negative prognostic factor for fresh embryo transfer in cycle cancellation, oocyte and embryo counts, and ongoing clinical pregnancy. The studies by Kawwass et al. and Kudesia et al. utilized only fresh embryo transfers. In addition, in the reports from Nogales et al. there is a possibility that the results may be affected by the procedures and culture methods between institutions because they were conducted at multiple centers. In the reports from Zhang et al., most embryos were at the cleavage stage, not blastocyst. Therefore, there were many previous reports of the effects of BMI on ART outcomes have included fresh embryo transfers and Western populations, but not FET and Asians. In addition, many previous studies have not distinguished day 5 and day 6 blastocysts, which could impact the evaluation of ART outcomes. Furthermore, most reports on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies and donor oocytes have not investigated their effects on embryogenesis. In contrast, the sample size in the present study was large, and the ART method and procedure were uniform because the study was conducted at a single institution. Our study reported on FET, a mainstream procedure in Japan 22 . Only the highest-grade embryos, such as 3AA or higher, were analyzed in this study. In addition, we considered the effect on ART outcomes by distinguishing day 5 from day 6 embryos. In many previous reports, BMI was divided into three or four groups; however, this study subdivided BMI groups further based on the World Health Organization guidelines. We believe this method has enabled us to investigate the effect of BMI on ART and pregnancy outcomes more accurately, thus benefiting East Asians who reportedly have a lower BMI than Western populations 1 . This study had two limitations. First, there may have been a loss in statistical power due to the division of BMI classification into more groups than in previous studies; any minor effects of BMI may have therefore been missed. Second, relatively few cases had a BMI ≥ 30, making it difficult to evaluate ART outcomes in patients with high BMI. Despite these limitations, this study provides insight into the effect of BMI on ART and pregnancy outcomes. In this study, BMI did not affect ART outcomes; however, we found that it was associated with the risk of hypertensive disorders, diabetes, and complications in offspring in a previous study. Therefore, we continue to recommend that women with obesity be required to lose weight before ART. However, weight loss does not appear to affect ART outcomes based on the results of this study and previous studies. In addition, our results indicate that physicians should not delay infertility treatment in older adult women. In the future, we believe it is necessary to increase the number of low and high BMI (< 15 and ≥ 30) cases and investigate them to improve fertility outcomes further.