The sonographic and endocrinologic evaluation of the endometrium in the luteal phase

In: Human Reproduction · 1986 · vol. 1(4) , pp. 219–222 · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a136388 · PMID:3549767 · W2262785753
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 2 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

Ultrasound assessment of endometrial thickness in the mid-luteal phase correlated with progesterone levels, showing thicker endometria in pregnant and non-pregnant women with adequate progesterone compared to those with insufficient progesterone.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Follicular development and the endometrial thickness were determined sonographically in 19 outpatients with different causes of sterility, treated during natural or stimulated cycles. The estimates of the endometrial thickness, assessed by ultrasound in the mid-luteal phase, and the levels of 17 beta-oestradiol and progesterone in the same patients sampled on the day of sonography were compared. Five patients became pregnant (group 1) and showed good progesterone values. Eight patients who were not pregnant showed progesterone values above 15 ng/ml in the mid-luteal phase (group 2). The progesterone values of group 3 were below 15 ng/ml by definition. The mean endometrial thickness in group 1 (means = 11.3 mm) and group 2 (means = 11.8 mm) were significantly higher than that of group 3 (means = 8.3 mm). The sonographic measurement of the mid-luteal endometrium thickness serves as an additional criterion for the evaluation of the secretory phase of the menstrual cycle.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (2)

Cited by (2)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK