The RANZCOG College Statement on prophylactic oophorectomy in older women undergoing hysterectomy for benign disease: is the evidence sufficient to change practice?

Alison H. Brand
The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2011 · vol. 51(4) , pp. 296–300 · doi:10.1111/j.1479-828x.2011.01308.x · PMID:21806570 · W2100293175
Other OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-28 ⓘ

A survey revealed limited adherence to a college statement recommending caution with prophylactic oophorectomy, with gynaecologists tending to remove ovaries with increasing patient age, despite a lack of high-quality evidence on ovarian retention postmenopause.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 2009, the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) published College Statement C-Gyn 25: "Prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease, which recommended that caution should be exercised in performing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (BSO) at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease in women younger than 65 years of age." AIMS: The aims of the study were to assess current practice with regard to prophylactic oophorectomy in this setting and to assess knowledge about the College Statement. We also sought to review the evidence behind the Statement. METHOD: An anonymous email survey of all consultant gynaecologists and gynaecology registrars in Sydney West Area Health Service (SWAHS) was conducted. RESULTS: The response rate was 52%. The survey found that there was an increasing tendency to remove ovaries with increasing patient age, and over 60% of gynaecologists would routinely recommend removal of ovaries during a hysterectomy for benign disease in a 60 year old woman. The survey also revealed a lack of knowledge as to the existence or content of the College Statement. A review of the literature found that evidence suggesting benefit in retention of ovaries in postmenopausal women has been extrapolated from a modelling study, observational studies or from data on premenopausal oophorectomy. CONCLUSION: A survey of gynaecologists revealed that few currently appear to adhere to the College Statement regarding prophylactic oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy for benign disease. High quality evidence regarding either harm or benefit following retention of ovaries after menopause is lacking. Nevertheless, dialogue between clinicians and patients on this topic is important.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

MeSH descriptors

Guideline Adherence Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice Hysterectomy Ovarian Neoplasms Ovariectomy Practice Patterns, Physicians' Adult Australia Female Gynecology Humans Male Middle Aged New Zealand Obstetrics Ovarian Neoplasms Ovariectomy Practice Guidelines as Topic Practice Patterns, Physicians' Societies, Medical

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (28)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:14:16.517584+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:09:19.025198+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-12T06:33:14.382917+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK