[Differential diagnosis of cystic adnexa processes. A comparison of the value of sonography, puncture cytology and color and biochemical biopsy analysis with histology]
other
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
This study compared ultrasound, cytology, and biochemical analysis of cystic fluid to histology for diagnosing 109 adnexal masses, finding biochemical markers identified functional cysts and separated endometriomas/malignancies.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The histological diagnoses of 109 cystic adnexal masses were compared with the results of ultrasound examination, color, cytology and biochemical analyses of cystic fluid. In cases with suspicious results by ultrasound examination most of the malignant tumors but only a small number of benign cystic masses were found. Macroscopic and cytologic examinations gave no further informations. By biochemical analyses functional cysts could be detected with 86% of sensitivity and 100% of specificity by a combination of estradiol, progesterone and Ca 12-5. Endometrioma and malignant tumors could be separated from other adnexal masses (specificity 95%, sensitivity 100%) with a combination of Tag 72-4 and CASA.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-30T09:23:35.175841+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:57.821266+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine