Platelet-rich plasma in the management of Asherman's syndrome: An RCT.

OA: gold CC-BY-NC-4.0
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-24

This RCT found that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection into the uterine cavity after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis did not significantly alter menstrual patterns or the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions in patients with Asherman's syndrome.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-03 · read from full text

This non-randomized clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of intrauterine platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection in reducing the recurrence of intrauterine adhesions following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in women with Asherman's syndrome. The study compared fifteen patients receiving PRP to a control group without intervention, assessing outcomes through hysteroscopic findings and menstrual patterns over an eight-to-ten-week follow-up period. Results indicated no significant difference between the groups regarding the stage of intrauterine adhesions or menstrual bleeding duration, suggesting that PRP did not improve surgical outcomes in this specific protocol. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

BackgroundAsherman's syndrome (AS) is a rare reproductive abnormality, resulting in endometrial collapse due to aggressive or recurrent endometritis and/or curettage.ObjectiveWe aimed to assess the effectiveness of using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) to lower the recurrence rate of intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) following hysteroscopy.Materials and methodsIn this non-randomized clinical trial, women aged 20-45 years with AS diagnosed by sonohysterography, 3D sonography, hysteroscopy, or uterosalpingography between May 2018 and September 2018 were included. Participants (n = 30) were divided into case and control groups. Following hysteroscopic adhesiolysis, a Foley catheter was placed into the uterine cavity in all women. After two days, the catheter was removed, and 1-mL PRP was injected into the uterine cavity of women in the PRP (case) group, while the control received no PRP. All controls and subjects underwent diagnostic hysteroscopy 8-10 weeks following the intervention to assess the IUAs according to the American Society for Reproductive Medicine scoring system.ResultsOur results did not reveal any significant difference in the menstrual pattern of either the control or test groups before or after treatment (p = 0.2). Moreover, the IUA stage in both studied groups before and after treatment was similar (p = 0.2). The duration of menstrual bleeding in both studied groups before and after treatment was also similar.ConclusionPRP cannot change the menstrual pattern or development of postsurgical AS, as evaluated by follow-up hysteroscopy.
Full text 12,519 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 2 sections · click to expand

Section

Our findings showed that PRP cannot change the menstrual pattern or the development of postsurgical AS, as evaluated by follow-up hysteroscopy.

Coi Statement

The authors have no financial or nonfinancial conflicts of interest.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-30T09:23:35.175841+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00
License: CC-BY-NC-4.0