[Mifepristone following conservative surgery in the treatment of endometriosis].

Zhonghua fu chan ke za zhi · 2001 · vol. 36(12) , pp. 717–20 · PMID:16136889 · W2382664988
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09

Mifepristone treatment following conservative endometriosis surgery was as effective as danazol with fewer side effects and no significant impact on bone metabolism or reproductive hormone levels.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of mifepristone and danazol after conservative surgery in the treatment of patients with endometriosis. METHODS: Sixty-one patients with endometriosis (RAFS stage I-IV ) after conservative surgery were treated orally either with mifepristone 10 mg/d (group M, n = 31) or danazol 200 mg 2-3 times/d (group D, n = 30) for 3 months. Changes of symptoms and signs, serum reproductive hormone levels as well as side effects were assessed before and at the end of therapy. Moreover, biochemical parameters of bone metabolism: urinary deoxypyridine /creatinine (UDpd/Cr), serum alkaline phosphatase (AKP) and bone gala-protein (BGP) were also measured before and after treatments. RESULTS: During treatment symptoms and signs were remarkbly relieved in both groups. Side effects including hot flushes, irregular vaginal bleeding, back pain, weight gain and acne, were less commnly seen in group M as compared with group D. Serum luteal hormone (LH), follicular stimulating homone (FSH) levels remained in the range of follicular phase in both groups. So was serum estradiol (E2) levels in group M[(204.9 +/- 45.3 ) pmol/L], but declined to postmenopausal level in group D [(94.3 +/- 33.0) pmol/L]. About two weeks after discontinuation of the thrapy, serum E2 levels [(1,221.6 +/- 384.2) pmol/L] was not significantly different from the normal ovulatory range in group M, but significantly lower in group D [(815.1 +/- 376.0) pmo/L, P < 0.05] . So were the serum progesterone levels at mid-luteal phase [(33.1 +/- 5.6) nmol/L Vs (27.4 +/- 4.9) nmol/L]. There were no significant changes of biochemical parameters of bone metabolism before and at the end of treatment except significant increases of serum AKP and BGP in group D. CONCLUSIONS: Mifepristone is equally effective to danazol when combined with conservative surgery in the management of endometriosis with fewer side effects. Serum E2 levels remained in the range of follicular phase. No impact on the bone turnover after 3 months of therapy was found.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Danazol Endometriosis Hormone Antagonists Mifepristone Bone Remodeling Bone Remodeling Combined Modality Therapy Danazol Endometriosis Endometriosis Female Hormone Antagonists Hormones Hormones Humans Mifepristone Postoperative Care Treatment Outcome

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cited by (4)

Cited by (4)

SciLite annotations

chemicals 11
mifepristone mifepristone danazol mifepristone danazol dihydroxypyridine creatinine estradiol progesterone mifepristone danazol

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:15:35.797702+00:00
scilite
last seen: 2026-05-18T04:57:49.680383+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK