Cervical Stenosis: A Challenging Clinical Entity

Rafael Valle, Rajendra Sankpal, John L. Marlow, Leeber Cohen
In: Journal of Gynecologic Surgery · 2002 · vol. 18(4) , pp. 129–143 · doi:10.1089/104240602762555939 · W2118247798
OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

This study evaluated 37 women with cervical stenosis, finding that 75.5% achieved relief after treatment, with sequential cervical dilatation and laser removal for recurrences showing promise.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Cervical stenosis can be a difficult clinical condition to treat effectively, and treatment may be followed by recurrences. Thirty-seven (37) women with this clinical diagnosis were evaluated and treated in our service over the last 5 years. Fifteen (15) women (43.2%) had previous cervical surgery such as conization, loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP), or cervical laser vaporization and 11 had a history of diethylstilbestrol (DES) exposure. After treatment, 28 (75.5%) of these women obtained relief while in 24.5% no changes occurred. Four women (14.2%) had recurrence. Based on our experience, sequential progressive cervical dilatation under sonographic or laparoscopic control seems to add safety and effectiveness in the treatment of this condition. For those patients who develop recurrences, laser removal of a cervical central cylinder of tissue seems to provide the best results. Avoiding excessive trauma to the cervix with any surgical procedure should be paramount in decreasing chances of causing cervical stenosis, particularly in susceptible patients such as nulliparous and DES-exposed women.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (30)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-13T06:25:51.201866+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK