Tackling poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes in obstetrics and gynecology research

review OA: bronze public-domain-us
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10

This paper addresses poor outcome selection, collection, and reporting in obstetrics and gynecology research, advocating for the implementation of core outcome sets to improve trial relevance and clinical practice.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Clinical research should ultimately improve patient care. To enable this, randomized controlled trials must select, collect, and report outcomes that are both relevant to clinical practice and genuinely reflect the perspectives of key stakeholders including health care professionals, researchers, and patients. Unfortunately, many randomized controlled trials fall short of this requirement. Complex issues, including a failure to take into account the perspectives of key stakeholders when selecting outcomes, variations in outcome definitions and measurement instruments, and outcome reporting bias make research evidence difficult to interpret, undermining the translation of research into clinical practice. Problems with poor outcome selection, measurement, and reporting can be addressed by developing, disseminating, and implementing core outcome sets. A core outcome set represents a minimum data set of outcomes developed using robust consensus science methods engaging diverse stakeholders including health care professionals, researchers, and patients. Core outcomes should be routinely utilized by researchers, collected in a standardized manner, and reported consistently in the final publication. They are currently being developed across our specialty including infertility, endometriosis, and preeclampsia. Recognizing poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes as serious hindrances to progress in our specialty, more than 80 journals including the Journal, have come together to support the Core Outcomes in Women's and Newborn Health (CROWN) initiative. The consortium supports researchers to develop, disseminate, and implement core outcome sets. Implementing core outcome sets could make a profound contribution to addressing poorly selected, collected, and reported outcomes. Implementation should ensure future randomized controlled trials hold the necessary reach and relevance to inform clinical practice, enhance patient care, and improve patient outcomes.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

COS-Endo-2020

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Biomedical Research Gynecology Information Dissemination Obstetrics Outcome Assessment, Health Care Biomedical Research Biomedical Research Data Collection Female Gynecology Gynecology Humans Needs Assessment Obstetrics Obstetrics Patient Reported Outcome Measures Pregnancy Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Research Design United States

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:31.300640+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine