Addition of intramuscular to vaginal progesterone for luteal phase support in fresh embryo transfer cycles: A cross-sectional study
This cross-sectional study compared luteal phase support regimens, finding that adding intramuscular progesterone to vaginal progesterone increased chemical pregnancy rates in fresh embryo transfer cycles.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated 355 infertile women undergoing fresh embryo transfer to compare luteal phase support using vaginal progesterone alone versus a combination of vaginal and intramuscular progesterone. The results indicated that while chemical pregnancy rates were significantly higher in the combined therapy group, there was no statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy or miscarriage rates between the two groups. A major limitation noted by the authors is the exclusion of patients with severe gynecologic disorders, which restricts the applicability of findings to women with compromised endometrial receptivity. Relevance to endometriosis: listed as one indication for GnRH antagonists, though the paper's main focus is uterine fibroids.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
11,958 characters
· extracted from
pmc-nxml
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Section
Coi Statement
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:37:28.796859+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-21T05:10:58.409756+00:00