The impact of periconceptional maternal stress on fecundability
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This study investigated the association between periconceptional maternal stress and fecundability, finding that higher stress levels correlated with reduced chances of conception.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
PurposeTo examine the association between periconceptional self-reported stress levels and fecundability in women.MethodsDaily stress was reported on a scale from 1 to 4 (lowest to highest) among 400 women who completed daily diaries including data on lifestyle and behavioral factors, menstrual characteristics, contraceptive use, and intercourse for up to 20 cycles or until pregnancy. Discrete survival analysis was used to estimate the associations between self-reported stress during specific windows of the menstrual cycle and fecundability (cycles at risk until pregnancy), adjusting for potential confounders.ResultsOne hundred thirty-nine women became pregnant. During the follicular phase, there was a 46% reduction in fecundability for a 1-unit increase in self-reported stress during the estimated ovulatory window (fecundability odds ratio [FOR] = 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35-0.84) and an attenuated trend for the preovulatory window (FOR = 0.73; 95% CI 0.48-1.10). During the luteal phase, higher stress was associated with increased probability of conception (FOR = 1.63, 95% CI 1.07-2.50), possibly due to reverse causality.ConclusionsHigher stress during the ovulatory window may reduce probability of conception; however, once conception occurs, changes in the hormonal milieu and/or knowledge of the pregnancy may result in increased stress. These findings reinforce the need for encouraging stress management techniques in the aspiring and expecting mother.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (37)
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a114417 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/oem.2003.012302 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/deh743 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0960-0760(97)80796-0 via openalex
- W11407771 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.12.032 via openalex
- doi:10.1046/j.8755-8920.2003.00116.x via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02008-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1056/nejm199906103402304 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008788 via openalex
- doi:10.32614/r.manuals via openalex
- doi:10.1080/09513590802296187 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)35583-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.08.001 via openalex
- doi:10.1191/0962280206sm435oa via openalex
- doi:10.1002/ajhb.20057 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199602)29:2<161::aid-ajim6>3.0.co;2-v via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s10815-008-9206-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/01.ede.0000190540.95748.e6 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.1985.03350440057031 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006842-197111000-00004 via openalex
- doi:10.1136/bmj.1.5697.657 via openalex
- doi:10.1002/nur.20188 via openalex
- W3217134939 via openalex
- W6600463172 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00493-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000123928 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/deu032 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.078 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-373975-9.x0001-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jri.2009.10.011 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/0306-4530(94)00057-h via openalex
- doi:10.3109/10253890903349501 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00186-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00001648-200001000-00006 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.05.018 via openalex
- doi:10.1210/jcem-51-3-466 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:41:50.100108+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK