Sacral neuromodulation treating chronic pelvic pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature

In: International Urogynecology Journal · 2019 · vol. 30(7) , pp. 1023–1035 · doi:10.1007/s00192-019-03898-w · PMID:30874835 · W2921051121
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 8 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08

This meta-analysis found sacral neuromodulation significantly improved pain scores in chronic pelvic pain patients, with comparable results between standard and caudal approaches.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-08 · read from full text

This paper studied whether sacral neuromodulation (SNM) improves chronic pelvic pain (CPP), using a systematic review and meta-analysis of peer-reviewed pre- and post-treatment pain intensity scores searched through September 2018. Fourteen studies involving 210 patients were eligible, and SNM produced a significant reduction in pain on a 10-point visual analog scale (weighted mean difference −4.34, 95% CI −5.22 to −3.64, p < 0.0001). Pain reduction was significant for both standard and caudal SNM approaches, with no clear difference between them, and improvement was less in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) than without, though voiding symptoms in IC/BPS improved (all p < 0.01). The authors’ main limitation is that the eligible evidence base is small (14 studies) and derived from uncontrolled pre–post pain measures rather than randomized comparisons. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 20,456 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 5 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Introduction and hypothesis Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) is gaining popularity as a treatment option for chronic pelvic pain (CPP). Our hypothesis is that SNM is effective in improving CPP.

Methods

A systematic search was conducted through September 2018. Peer-reviewed studies using pre- and postpain intensity scores were selected. The primary outcome was pain improvement on a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS) (adjusted or de novo) in patients with CPP. Secondary outcomes included comparing SNM approaches and etiologies and evaluating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS).

Results

Fourteen of 2175 studies, evaluating 210 patients, were eligible for further analysis. The overall VAS pain score improvement was significant [weighted mean difference (WMD) −4.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) = −5.22, to−3.64, p < 0.0001)]. Regarding SNM approach, both standard and caudal approaches had significant reduction in pain scores: WMD −4.32, CI 95% = −5.32, to −3.31 (p < 0.001) for the standard approach, compared with WMD −4.63, 95% CI = −6.57 to −2.69 (P < 0.001), for the caudal approach (p = 0.75). While significant improvement in pain was observed both in patients with and without interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), the observed improvement was lower in patients with (WMD −4.13, CI 95% −5.36 to −2.90 versus without (WMD −5.72, CI 95% = −6.18, to−5.27) IC/BPS (p = 0.02). SNM was effective in treating voiding symptoms (frequency, urgency, nocturia) associated with IC/BPS (all p < 0.01).

Conclusions

SNM is an effective therapy for CPP in both IC/BSP and non-IC/BSP patients, with better results in non-IC/BSP patients. Outcomes of the antegrade caudal approach were comparable with the standard retrograde approach. Similar content being viewed by others Abbreviations - SNM: - Sacral neuromodulation - CPP: - Chronic pelvic pain - VAS: - Visual analog scale - IC: - Interstitial cystitis - BPS: - Bladder pain syndrome - WMD: - Weighted mean difference - PNE: - Percutaneous nerve evaluation

References

Mathias SD, Kuppermann M, Liberman RF, Lipschutz RC, Steege JF. Chronic pelvic pain: prevalence, health-related quality of life, and economic correlates. Obstet Gynecol. 1996;87(3):321–7. (RCOG) RCoOaG. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines: The initial management of chronic pelvic pain. London (UK): Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). https://www.guideline.gov/summaries/summary/37221/the-initial-management-of-chronic-pelvic-pain?q=pelvic+pain (2012). Accessed 2 Aug 2017. Nickel JC, Tripp D, Gordon A, Pontari M, Shoskes D, Peters KM, et al. Update on urologic pelvic pain syndromes: highlights from the 2010 international chronic pelvic pain symposium and workshop, august 29, 2010, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Rev Urol. 2011;13(1):39. Zondervan KT, Yudkin PL, Vessey MP, Dawes MG, Barlow DH, Kennedy SH. Prevalence and incidence of chronic pelvic pain in primary care: evidence from a national general practice database. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 1999;106(11):1149–55. Nwankwo T, Yoon SS, Burt V, Gu Q. Hypertension among adults in the United States: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2011-2012. NCHS Data Brief. 2013;133:1–8. Latthe P, Mignini L, Gray R, Hills R, Khan K. Factors predisposing women to chronic pelvic pain: systematic review. BMJ. 2006;332(7544):749–55. Zhang P, Zhang J, Wu L, Niu H, Yang Y, Zhang X. Short-term outcome of sacral neuromodulation on refractory interstitial cystitis/pelvic pain syndrome. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016;96(48):3875–8. Speer LM, Mushkbar S, Erbele T. Chronic pelvic pain in women. Am Fam Physician. 2016;93(5):380–7. Thompson JH, Sutherland SE, Siegel SW. Sacral neuromodulation: therapy evolution. Indian J Urol IJU J Urol Soc India. 2010;26(3):379. Dasgupta R, Critchley HD, Dolan RJ, Fowler CJ. Changes in brain activity following sacral neuromodulation for urinary retention. J Urol. 2005;174(6):2268–72. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA. 2000;283(15):2008–12. Schünemann H, Brozek J, Oxman A. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October; 2013. Chung JW, Han DH, Lee K-S. Efficacy and safety of sacral neuromodulation (Interstim®) for the treatment of refractory overactive bladder symptoms and chronic pelvic pain. Korean J Urol. 2007;48(7):701–5. Vancaillie T, Kite L, Howard E, Chow J. Sacral neuromodulation for pelvic pain and pelvic organ dysfunction: a case series. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58(1):102–7. Roth TM. Successful treatment of paradoxical puborectalis contraction and intractable anorectal pain with sacral neuromodulation. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2018;24(4):e21–2. Chai TC, Zhang C-O, Warren JW, Keay S. Percutaneous sacral third nerve root neurostimulation improves symptoms and normalizes urinary HB-EGF levels and antiproliferative activity in patients with interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2000;55(5):643–6. Maher CF, Carey MP, Dwyer PL, Schluter PL. Percutaneous sacral nerve root neuromodulation for intractable interstitial cystitis. J Urol. 2001;165(3):884–6. Siegel S, Paszkiewicz E, Kirkpatrick C, Hinkel B, Oleson K. Sacral nerve stimulation in patients with chronic intractable pelvic pain. J Urol. 2001;166(5):1742–5. Aboseif S, Tamaddon K, Chalfin S, Freedman S, Kaptein J. Sacral neuromodulation as an effective treatment for refractory pelvic floor dysfunction. Urology. 2002;60(1):52–6. Comiter CV. Sacral neuromodulation for the symptomatic treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis: a prospective study. J Urol. 2003;169(4):1369–73. Whitmore KE, Payne CK, Diokno AC, Lukban JC. Sacral neuromodulation in patients with interstitial cystitis: a multicenter clinical trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2003;14(5):305–9. Lavano A, Volpentesta G, Piragine G, Iofrida G, De Rose M, Abbate F, et al. Sacral nerve stimulation with percutaneous dorsal transforamenal approach in treatment of isolated pelvic pain syndromes. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2006;9(3):229–33. Falletto E, Masin A, Lolli P, Villani R, Ganio E, Ripetti V, et al. Is sacral nerve stimulation an effective treatment for chronic idiopathic anal pain? Dis Colon rectum. 2009;52(3):456–62. Ghazwani YQ, Elkelini MS, Hassouna MM. Efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in treatment of bladder pain syndrome: long-term follow-up. Neurourol Urodyn. 2011;30(7):1271–5. Marinkovic SP, Gillen LM, Marinkovic CM. Minimum 6-year outcomes for interstitial cystitis treated with sacral neuromodulation. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(4):407–12. Martellucci J, Naldini G, Del Popolo G, Carriero A. Sacral nerve modulation in the treatment of chronic pain after pelvic surgery. Color Dis. 2012;14(4):502–7. Sokal P, Zieliński P, Harat M. Sacral roots stimulation in chronic pelvic pain. Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2015;49(5):307–12. Alonso Guardo L, Cano Gala C, Sanchez Poveda D, Rueda Juan P, Sanchez Montero FJ, Garzon Sanchez JC, et al. Caudal neuromodulation with the transforaminal sacral electrode (InterStim®): experience in a pain center regarding 12 implants. Korean J Pain. 2016;29(1):23–8. NHLBI. Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools (2017). Accessed 8 Sept 2017. Wells G, Shea B, O’Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, et al. Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale, cohort studies; 2014. Phillips B, Ball C, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B, Dawes M. Modified from Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. http://www.cebm.net/oxford-centre-evidence-based-medicine-levels-evidence-march-2009/ (2009). Accessed 15 Nov 2017. Srivastava D. Efficacy of sacral neuromodulation in treating chronic pain related to painful bladder syndrome/interstitial cystitis in adults. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2012;28(4):428. Tirlapur SA, Vlismas A, Ball E, Khan KS. Nerve stimulation for chronic pelvic pain and bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2013;92(8):881–7. Wang J, Chen Y, Chen J, Zhang G, Wu P. Sacral neuromodulation for refractory bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):11031. Marcelissen T, Jacobs R, Van Kerrebroeck P, De Wachter S. Sacral neuromodulation as a treatment for chronic pelvic pain. J Urol. 2011;186(2):387–93. Ryder R. Chronic pelvic pain. Am Fam Physician. 1996;54(7):2225–2232, 2237, Riddle P, Hill D, Wallace D. Electronic techniques for the control of adult urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 1969;41(2):205–10. Stanton SL, Edwards L. Treatment of paediatric urinary incontinence by stimulator implant. BJU Int. 1973;45(5):508–14. Nakamura M, Sakurai T, Tsujimoto Y, Tada Y. Bladder inhibition by electrical stimulation of the perianal skin. Urol Int. 1986;41(1):62–3. de Groat CW, Vizzard MA, Araki I, Roppolo J. Spinal interneurons and preganglionic neurons in sacral autonomic reflex pathways. Prog Brain Res. 1996;107:97–111. Chancellor MB, Chartier-Kastler EJ. Principles of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for the treatment of bladder and urethral sphincter dysfunctions. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2000;3(1):16–26. Edlund C, Hellström M, Peeker R, Fall M. First Scandinavian experience of electrical sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of the overactive bladder. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2000;34(6):366–76. Weil E, Ruiz-Cerda J, Eerdmans P, Janknegt R, Van Kerrebroeck P. Clinical results of sacral neuromodulation for chronic voiding dysfunction using unilateral sacral foramen electrodes. World J Urol. 1998;16(5):313–21. Webster G, Galloway N. Surgical treatment of interstitial cystitis. Indications, techniques, and results. Urology. 1987;29(4 Suppl):34–9. Held P, Hanno P, Wein A, Pauly M, Cahn M. Epidemiology of interstitial cystitis: 2. In: Interstitial cystitis. New York: Springer; 1990. p. 29–48. Shaker H, Wang Y, Loung D, Balbaa L, Fehlings M, Hassouna M. Role of C-afferent fibres in the mechanism of action of sacral nerve root neuromodulation in chronic spinal cord injury. BJU Int. 2000;85(7):905–10. Gooneratne M, Facer P, Knowles C, Chan C, Lunniss P, Scott S, et al. Normalization of substance P levels in rectal mucosa of patients with faecal incontinence treated successfully by sacral nerve stimulation. Br J Surg. 2008;95(4):477–83. Park CH, Kim BI. Sacral nerve stimulation through the sacral hiatus. Korean J Pain. 2012;25(3):195–7. Kohli N, Rosenblatt PL. Neuromodulation techniques for the treatment of the overactive bladder. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2002;45(1):218–32. Chodez M, Trilling B, Thuillier C, Boillot B, Barbois S, Faucheron J-L. Results of sacral nerve neuromodulation for double incontinence in adults. Tech Coloproctol. 2014;18(12):1147–51. Feler CA, Whitworth LA, Brookoff D, Powell R. Recent advances: sacral nerve root stimulation using a retrograde method of lead insertion for the treatment of pelvic pain due to interstitial cystitis. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 1999;2(3):211–6. Aló KM, Zidan AM. Selective nerve root stimulation (SNRS) in the treatment of end-stage, diabetic, peripheral neuropathy: a case report. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2000;3(4):201–8. Richter EO, Abramova MV, Aló KM. Percutaneous cephalocaudal implantation of epidural stimulation electrodes over sacral nerve roots—a technical note on the importance of the lateral approach. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2011;14(1):62–7. Feler CA, Whitworth LA, Fernandez J. Sacral neuromodulation for chronic pain conditions. Anesthesiol Clin North Am. 2003;21(4):785–95. Spinelli M, Sievert K-D. Latest technologic and surgical developments in using InterStim™ therapy for sacral neuromodulation: impact on treatment success and safety. Eur Urol. 2008;54(6):1287–96. Amend B, Khalil M, Kessler TM, Sievert K-D. How does sacral modulation work best? Placement and programming techniques to maximize efficacy. Curr Urol Rep. 2011;12(5):327. Siegel S, Noblett K, Mangel J, Bennett J, Griebling TL, Sutherland SE, et al. Five-year followup results of a prospective, multicenter study of patients with overactive bladder treated with sacral neuromodulation. J Urol. 2018;199(1):229–36. Matzel KE, Chartier-Kastler E, Knowles CH, Lehur PA, Muñoz-Duyos A, Ratto C, et al. Sacral neuromodulation: standardized electrode placement technique. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface. 2017;20(8):816–24. Kaufmann S, Naumann CM, Hamann MF, Seif C, Braun PM, Jünemann KP, et al. Unilateral vs bilateral sacral neuromodulation in pigs with formalin-induced detrusor hyperactivity. BJU Int. 2009;103(2):260–3. Scheepens W, Weil E, van Kerrebroeck E. Unilateral versus bilateral sacral neuromodulation in patients with chronic voiding dysfunction. J Urol. 2002;168(5):2046–50. Zabihi N, Mourtzinos A, Maher MG, Raz S, Rodríguez LV. Short-term results of bilateral S2–S4 sacral neuromodulation for the treatment of refractory interstitial cystitis, painful baldder syndrome, and chronic pelvic pain. Int Urogynecol J. 2008;19(4):553–7. Steinberg AC, Oyama IA, Whitmore KE. Bilateral S3 stimulator in patients with interstitial cystitis. Urology. 2007;69(3):441–3. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Ethics declarations Financial disclaimer None. Conflicts of interest None. Additional information Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Electronic supplementary material ESM 1 (download DOCX ) (DOCX 21.5 kb) ESM 2 (download DOCX ) (DOCX 15.8 kb) Appendix Appendix Database(s): Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily 1946 to 14 September 2018. Search Strategy: No. | Searches | Results | 1 | exp Electric Stimulation Therapy/ | 72,449 | 2 | (electric adj2 stimulation*).ti,ab. | 5183 | 3 | (nerve adj2 stimulation*).ti,ab. | 21,658 | 4 | Neuromodulation*.mp. | 6090 | 5 | neurostimulat*.mp. | 2998 | 6 | or/1–5 | 98,181 | 7 | URINARY INCONTINENCE/or FECAL INCONTINENCE/or URINARY INCONTINENCE, URGE/or URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS/ | 37,753 | 8 | incontinence.ti,ab. | 42,912 | 9 | incontinent.ti,ab. | 3853 | 10 | exp Urinary Bladder Diseases/ | 95,824 | 11 | bladder.ti,ab. | 142,717 | 12 | cystitis.ti,ab. | 10,417 | 13 | Urination Disorders/ | 10,985 | 14 | (urin* adj2 disorder*).ti,ab. | 1609 | 15 | Pelvic Pain/ | 4796 | 16 | “pelvic pain”.ti,ab. | 8048 | 17 | or/7–16 | 230,545 | 18 | exp SACRUM/ | 8306 | 19 | sacrum.ti,ab. | 4813 | 20 | sacral.ti,ab. | 15,321 | 21 | or/18–20 | 22,162 | 22 | 6 and 17 and 21 | 1512 | 23 | limit 22 to animals | 150 | 24 | 22 not 23 | 1362 | 25 | limit 24 to (case reports or comment or editorial or letter) | 148 | 26 | 24 not 25 | 1214 | 27 | limit 26 to (english language and last 30 years) | 1061 | 28 | from 27 keep 1–1061 | 1061 | PubMed Medline (((((((((((Electric Stimulation Therapy[MeSH Terms]) OR electric stimulation*[Title/Abstract]) OR nerve stimulation*[Title/Abstract]) OR Neuromodulation*) OR neurostimulat*[Title/Abstract])) AND ((((((((((((((URINARY INCONTINENCE[MeSH Terms]) OR FECAL INCONTINENCE[MeSH Terms]) OR urinary incontinence, urge[MeSH Terms]) OR urinary incontinence, stress[MeSH Terms])) OR incontinence[Title/Abstract]) OR incontinent[Title/Abstract]) OR Urinary Bladder Diseases[MeSH Terms]) OR bladder[Title/Abstract]) OR cystitis[Title/Abstract]) OR Urination Disorders[MeSH Terms]) OR Urination Disorder*[Title/Abstract]) OR “Pelvic Pain”[Mesh:noexp]) OR pelvic pain[Title/Abstract])) AND (((SACRUM[MeSH Terms]) OR sacrum[Title/Abstract]) OR sacral[Title/Abstract]))) NOT (((((((((Electric Stimulation Therapy[MeSH Terms]) OR electric stimulation*[Title/Abstract]) OR nerve stimulation*[Title/Abstract]) OR Neuromodulation*) OR neurostimulat*[Title/Abstract])) AND ((((((((((((((URINARY INCONTINENCE[MeSH Terms]) OR FECAL INCONTINENCE[MeSH Terms]) OR urinary incontinence, urge[MeSH Terms]) OR urinary incontinence, stress[MeSH Terms])) OR incontinence[Title/Abstract]) OR incontinent[Title/Abstract]) OR Urinary Bladder Diseases[MeSH Terms]) OR bladder[Title/Abstract]) OR cystitis[Title/Abstract]) OR Urination Disorders[MeSH Terms]) OR Urination Disorder*[Title/Abstract]) OR “Pelvic Pain”[Mesh:noexp]) OR pelvic pain[Title/Abstract])) AND (((SACRUM[MeSH Terms]) OR sacrum[Title/Abstract]) OR sacral[Title/Abstract])) AND ((Case Reports[ptyp] OR Comment[sb] OR Editorial[ptyp] OR Letter[ptyp]))))) NOT (((((((((((Electric Stimulation Therapy[MeSH Terms]) OR electric stimulation*[Title/Abstract]) OR nerve stimulation*[Title/Abstract]) OR Neuromodulation*) OR neurostimulat*[Title/Abstract])) AND ((((((((((((((URINARY INCONTINENCE[MeSH Terms]) OR FECAL INCONTINENCE[MeSH Terms]) OR urinary incontinence, urge[MeSH Terms]) OR urinary incontinence, stress[MeSH Terms])) OR incontinence[Title/Abstract]) OR incontinent[Title/Abstract]) OR Urinary Bladder Diseases[MeSH Terms]) OR bladder[Title/Abstract]) OR cystitis[Title/Abstract]) OR Urination Disorders[MeSH Terms]) OR Urination Disorder*[Title/Abstract]) OR “Pelvic Pain”[Mesh:noexp]) OR pelvic pain[Title/Abstract])) AND (((SACRUM[MeSH Terms]) OR sacrum[Title/Abstract]) OR sacral[Title/Abstract]))) NOT (((((((((Electric Stimulation Therapy[MeSH Terms]) OR electric stimulation*[Title/Abstract]) OR nerve stimulation*[Title/Abstract]) OR Neuromodulation*) OR neurostimulat*[Title/Abstract])) AND ((((((((((((((URINARY INCONTINENCE[MeSH Terms]) OR FECAL INCONTINENCE[MeSH Terms]) OR urinary incontinence, urge[MeSH Terms]) OR urinary incontinence, stress[MeSH Terms])) OR incontinence[Title/Abstract]) OR incontinent[Title/Abstract]) OR Urinary Bladder Diseases[MeSH Terms]) OR bladder[Title/Abstract]) OR cystitis[Title/Abstract]) OR Urination Disorders[MeSH Terms]) OR Urination Disorder*[Title/Abstract]) OR “Pelvic Pain”[Mesh:noexp]) OR pelvic pain[Title/Abstract])) AND (((SACRUM[MeSH Terms]) OR sacrum[Title/Abstract]) OR sacral[Title/Abstract])) AND ((Case Reports[ptyp] OR Comment[sb] OR Editorial[ptyp] OR Letter[ptyp])))) AND Animals[Mesh:noexp]) English language- 1988-2018. Embase Session Results (18 Sep 2018) No. | Query | Results | 30 | 27 NOT 28 AND [english]/lim AND [1988–2018]/py | 1212 | 29 | 27 NOT 28 | 1413 | 28 | 25 NOT 26 AND [animals]/lim | 177 | 27 | 25 NOT 26 | 1590 | 26 | 25 AND ‘case report’/de | 123 | 25 | 23 NOT 24 | 1713 | 24 | 23 AND (‘conference abstract’/it OR ‘conference paper’/it OR ‘conference review’/it OR ‘editorial’/it OR ‘letter’/it) | 1261 | 23 | 7 AND 11 AND 22 | 2974 | 22 | 12 OR 13 OR 14 OR 15 OR 16 OR 17 OR 18 OR 19 OR 20 OR 21 | 411,367 | 21 | pelvis NEAR/2 pain | 13,619 | 20 | pelvic NEAR/2 pain | 17,397 | 19 | ‘pelvic pain’/exp. OR ‘pelvic pain’ | 20,112 | 18 | ‘urination disorder’:ti,ab | 46 | 17 | ‘micturition disorder’/exp. OR ‘micturition disorder’ | 143,105 | 16 | cystitis:ti,ab | 15,122 | 15 | bladder:ti,ab | 200,602 | 14 | ‘bladder disease’/exp. OR ‘bladder disease’ | 168,493 | 13 | incontinence:ti,ab | 67,242 | 12 | ‘incontinence’/exp. OR ‘incontinence’ | 107,391 | 11 | 8 OR 9 OR 10 | 29,033 | 10 | sacral:ti,ab | 21,699 | 9 | sacrum:ti,ab | 6670 | 8 | ‘sacrum’/exp. OR ‘sacrum’ | 12,712 | 7 | 1 OR 2 OR 3 OR 4 OR 5 OR 6 | 280,338 | 6 | neurostimulat*:ti,ab | 4112 | 5 | neuromodulation | 44,386 | 4 | ‘neuromodulation’/exp. OR ‘neuromodulation’ | 44,386 | 3 | nerve NEAR/2 stimulation | 70,552 | 2 | electric NEAR/2 stimulation | 7840 | 1 | ‘electrotherapy’/exp. OR ‘electrotherapy’ | Web of Science TS = (“electric stimulation therapy” OR electric NEAR/2 stimulation OR nerve NEAR/2 stimulation OR neuromodulation* OR neurostimulat*) AND TS = (incontinence OR incontinent OR bladder or cystitis OR “urination disorder*” OR urin* NEAR/2 disorder* OR pelvic pain) AND TS = (sacrum OR sacral))ANDLANGUAGE: (English) AND DOCUMENT TYPES: (Article). Indexes = SCI-EXPANDED Timespan = 1988–2018. Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Mahran, A., Baaklini, G., Hassani, D. et al. Sacral neuromodulation treating chronic pelvic pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review of the literature. Int Urogynecol J 30, 1023–1035 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03898-w Received: Accepted: Published: Version of record: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-019-03898-w

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

chronic_pelvic_pain

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (63)

Cited by (8)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-11T06:22:51.059792+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK