Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DWI) Parameters in Benign and Malignant Ovarian Tumors with Solid and Cystic Components
other
OA: gold
public-domain-us
AI-generated summary
This study found that lower solid ADC and higher solid eADC values on diffusion-weighted MRI can differentiate malignant from benign ovarian tumors with solid and cystic components.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the values of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) parameters on differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumours with solid and cystic components.
STUDY DESIGN: An observational study.
PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: Department of Radiology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, China, from January to December 2017.
METHODOLOGY: Forty-four cases of malignant and benign ovarian tumours were selected as respective groups. Inclusion criteria were ovarian masses found by pelvic and abdominal imaging examination. Exclusion criteria of two groups were endometriosis and pelvic inflammatory diseases found by relevant examination, those with chronic diseases, tumors in other organs found by relevant examination, and those with family cancer history. Conventional MRI plain scans, enhanced scans and DWI scans, were performed after admission. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and exponential apparent diffusion imaging (eADC) of solid lesions of two groups were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: Solid ADC in malignant group was lower than that in benign group (p<0.001). Solid eADC in malignant group was higher than that in benign group (p<0.001).
CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging is of high application value in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumours with solid and cystic components, and it is worthy of promotion and application.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-03T06:16:46.921020+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:23:01.605684+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-05-14T19:30:52.867331+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine