The impact of microsurgery in gynecology
review
OA: closed
public-domain-us
Abstract
Reconstructive microsurgery has been associated with significantly improved results in infertility. These techniques have made the gynecologist much more conscious of peritoneal trauma and of postoperative adhesions. It has enabled the appreciation of normal and pathologic fine morphologic details. The assimilation of microsurgical principles into gynecology will provide its major benefit in terms of prophylaxis. A pelvic laparotomy in the female infant, adolescent, or young woman will aim at conservation and the avoidance of trauma, postoperative adhesions, and future reduction of fertility. Microsurgery enables a tubal transplantation. Although this is feasible today in a homozygous twin, the wider application of this procedure must await necessary progress in immunology. Microsurgical techniques are required for extracorporeal fertilization. In the not too distant future, microsurgery will become an integral part of fertility-promoting procedures. There will no longer be the need to qualify "microsurgery" since "fertility surgery" will simply imply "fertility microsurgery."
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-16T09:21:09.727480+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:10:10.897782+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-08-21T06:37:11.537704+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine