Diagnosis and Nursing Intervention of Gynecological Ovarian Endometriosis with Magnetic Resonance Imaging under Artificial Intelligence Algorithm

Ni-jie Jiang, Hong Xie, Jiao Lin, Yun Wang, Yanan Yin
Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022 · vol. 2022 , pp. 1–10 · doi:10.1155/2022/3123310 · PMID:35726287 · PMC9206576 · W4282016600
rct OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 8 in-corpus citations
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 ⓘ

An artificial intelligence FCM algorithm improved MRI diagnosis accuracy for ovarian endometriosis, while comprehensive nursing intervention increased patient satisfaction and reduced adverse reactions compared to routine care.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This research was aimed to study the application value of the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis under artificial intelligence algorithms and the effect of nursing intervention on patients with gynecological ovarian endometriosis. 116 patients with ovarian endometriosis were randomly divided into a control group (routine nursing) and an experimental group (comprehensive nursing), with 58 cases in each group. The artificial intelligence fuzzy C-means (FCM) clustering algorithm was proposed and used in the MRI diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis. The application value of the FCM algorithm was evaluated through the accuracy, Dice, sensitivity, and specificity of the imaging diagnosis, and the nursing satisfaction and the incidence of adverse reactions were used to evaluate the effect of nursing intervention. The results showed that, compared with the traditional hard C-means (HCM) algorithm, the artificial intelligence FCM algorithm gave a significantly higher partition coefficient, and its partition entropy and running time were significantly reduced, with significant differences (P < 0.05). The average values of Dice, sensitivity, and specificity of patients' MRI images were 0.77, 0.73, and 0.72, respectively, which were processed by the traditional HCM algorithm, while those values obtained by the improved artificial intelligence FCM algorithm were 0.92, 0.90, and 0.93, respectively; all the values were significantly improved (P < 0.05). In addition, the accuracy of MRI diagnosis based on the artificial intelligence FCM algorithm was 94.32 ± 3.05%, which was significantly higher than the 81.39 ± 3.11% under the HCM algorithm (P < 0.05). The overall nursing satisfaction of the experimental group was 96.5%, which was significantly better than the 87.9% of the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative adverse reactions in the experimental group (7.9%) was markedly lower than that in the control group (24.1%), with a significant difference (P < 0.05). In short, MRI images under the artificial intelligence FCM algorithm could greatly improve the clinical diagnosis of ovarian endometriosis, and the comprehensive nursing intervention would also improve the prognosis and recovery of patients.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Artificial Intelligence Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (22)

Cited by (8)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:48.454388+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-06-11T06:19:37.928166+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK