Performance of multidetector CT in the evaluation of the endometrium: Measurement of endometrial thickness and detection of disease
article
OA: closed
CC0
AI-generated summary
This study evaluated the accuracy of multidetector CT for measuring endometrial thickness and detecting endometrial disease.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
AimTo evaluate the performance of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in the measurement of endometrial thickness and assessment for endometrial disease.Materials and methodsSeventy-nine MDCT examinations, including sagittal reformats from isotropic data, were retrospectively evaluated for the presence of endometrial abnormality, endometrial thickness, and recommendation for transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) after CT. The endometrial thickness was measured on sagittal images using two different methods, between the inner-to-inner hypoattenuating stripe, and when visible, between the outer-to-outer hyperattenuating stripe. TVUS performed within 48 h of CT in premenopausal and 1 month in postmenopausal patients served as reference standard. Interobserver agreement for endometrial thickness and abnormalities was assessed using concordance correlation (CC) and kappa statistics.ResultsInterobserver agreement for endometrial thickness on sagittal CT images was excellent (CC 0.98), and highly accurate using the inner-to-inner measurement. For determination of abnormal thickening, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 67-100% and 99.5-100%. For detection of any endometrial abnormality, the positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 79-90% and 84-95%, respectively. False-negative missed abnormalities included small volume hydrometra, a polyp, and endometrial distortion by a fibroid.ConclusionAt MDCT, sagittal reformatted images provide reliable endometrial measurement using the inner-to-inner hypoattenuating stripe and are accurately categorized as normal or abnormal thickness using the same numerical criteria as at sonography.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
References (15)
- Imaging the Endometrium: Disease and Normal Variants via openalex
- Normal or Abnormal? Demystifying Uterine and Cervical Contrast Enhancement at Multidetector CT via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.146.6.1115 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0720-048x(97)00173-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2011.03.011 via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.07.3371 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/j.acra.2006.09.050 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00330-007-0839-z via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00261-007-9348-4 via openalex
- doi:10.2214/ajr.176.3.1760603 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s10140-008-0732-3 via openalex
- doi:10.1007/s00261-008-9415-5 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/rg.297095710 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0899-7071(02)00443-6 via openalex
- doi:10.7863/jum.2001.20.10.1025 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:37:04.871248+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK