Normal or Abnormal? Demystifying Uterine and Cervical Contrast Enhancement at Multidetector CT

Silaja Yitta, Elizabeth M Hecht, Elizabeth V Mausner, Genevieve L Bennett
Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2011 · vol. 31(3) , pp. 647–661 · doi:10.1148/rg.313105057 · PMID:21571649 · W2154851241
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

Computed tomography (CT) is not generally advocated as the first-line imaging examination for disorders of the female pelvis. However, multidetector CT is often the modality of choice for evaluating nongynecologic pelvic abnormalities, particularly in emergent settings, in which all the pelvic organs are invariably assessed. Incidental findings of uterine and cervical contrast enhancement in such settings may easily be mistaken for abnormalities, given the broad spectrum of anatomic variants and enhancement patterns that may be seen in the normal uterus and cervix. The authors' review of CT and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging enhancement patterns, augmented by case examples from their clinical radiology practice, provides a solid foundation for understanding the spectrum of normal uterine and cervical appearances and avoiding potential pitfalls in the diagnosis of benign cervical lesions, adenomyosis, infection, malignancy, and postpartum effects. This information should help radiologists more confidently differentiate between normal and abnormal CT findings and, when CT findings are not definitive, offer appropriate recommendations for follow-up ultrasonography or MR imaging.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Contrast Media Genital Diseases, Female Tomography, X-Ray Computed Diagnosis, Differential Female Genital Diseases, Female Humans Incidental Findings Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tomography, X-Ray Computed Ultrasonography

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (29)

Cited by (6)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:16:42.478857+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-06-04T02:00:05.705006+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK