Cytology of peritoneal washings in gynecologic patients. Diagnostic criteria and pitfalls.
This study reviewed peritoneal washings from 226 gynecologic patients, detailing diagnostic criteria and pitfalls in distinguishing reactive mesothelium from malignancy and benign from malignant ovarian lesions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
Cited by (11)
- Diagnostic Cytopathology of Peritoneal Washings 2022
- Endosalpingiosis in peritoneal washings in women with benign gynecologic conditions 2013
- Challenges in the Interpretation of Peritoneal Cytologic Specimens 2009
- Fine‐needle aspiration cytodiagnosis of endometriosis in cesarean section scar and rectus sheath mass lesions—A study of seven cases 2008
- Atypical papillary proliferation in gynecologic patients: A study of 32 pelvic washes 2005
- Peritoneal washing cytology 2004
- Endometrial glands in ascites secondary to endometriosis 2004
- Epidemiology of Endometriosis 2003
- Biases in the endometriosis literature 1998
- Cytologic Diagnosis of Peritoneal Fluids 1997
- Diagnosis of endometriosis by fine‐needle aspiration cytology 1991
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-08-29T06:12:09.280863+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:40.384591+00:00