L’hystéroplastie dˈagrandissement : à propos des résultats
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
AI-generated summary
This paper presents the results of uterine enlargement surgery (hystéropasty) for women with uterine malformations.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
The DiethylstilBbestrol (DES) is a synthetic estrogen which was prescribed from 1941 onwards for the prevention of miscarriage. As well as a possible risk of cancer, another side effect of this treatment was the possible of abnormality of the genitalia in the female issue of the prescribed user. Apart from possibly having a hypoplasic uterus, the patient is also prone, in the case where she has an undersized uterus, to having a much narrower than normal cavity. Consequently there is a tendency for an excess of muscle tissue on the uterus walls. This can be observed on an RMN. The most significant characteristics of this abnormality are: constriction rings around the proximal uterine segment, a T shaped uterus, uterus with an arched based. The idea of the plastic enlargement operation is to widen the cavity by making careful incisions on the excess muscle tissue located on the uterus wall. The objective of this is to obtain a triangular shaped cavity taking care though not to weaken the walls themselves. 51 patients were treated. We observed 31 pregnancies (49%) after 16 months with 25 ungoing pregnancies. Generally the anatomic results are excellent but it's difficult to measure the functional results or the success rate in future pregnancies. The reason for this is the enlarging of the cavity alone does not guarantee successful fertility. There are other problems to take in to account e.g. implantation, miscarriage and premature labor. There are risks with this operation: placenta percreta, a possible rupture of the uterus, though this can happen at any time with DES patients. This operation can only be recommended once a thorough examination of the patient has been made. It is not advisable with a patient who has a hypoplasic cavity in a hypoplasic uterus (hysterometry < 4 cm). This operation should never be done as a first course of action but it can be recommended above all if the patient has a constriction ring: as a sole reason for infertility; where infertility has been diagnosed and unsuccessfully treated; and an unexplained failure of ART, and where the patient has unexplained repeated miscarriages.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (1)
References (17)
- W104957701 via openalex
- W1522421580 via openalex
- W1980877471 via openalex
- W2021809715 via openalex
- W2049276903 via openalex
- W2087143177 via openalex
- W2137229213 via openalex
- W2265167920 via openalex
- W2394651527 via openalex
- W2411877613 via openalex
- W2412750506 via openalex
- W2418004539 via openalex
- W2431048152 via openalex
- W4248800138 via openalex
- W4285719527 via openalex
- W6693457234 via openalex
- W6727059993 via openalex
Cited by (1)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK