Results
Overall, 10,251 women were included from the 2013–2014 and
2015–2016 NHANES cycles (mobile exam response rate ranged from:
58.9–77.1%( 15 )). Of these,
3,423 (33.4%) were of reproductive age (18–49 years of age), 3,304
(96.5%) of these women completed an interview and physical exam, and 2,631
(79.6%) reported being sexually-experienced. Our analytic sample included the
2,626 (99.8%) sexually-experienced women 18–49 years of age who provided
an answer to the question on lifetime history of infertility.
The weighted prevalence of self-reported lifetime infertility was 13.8%
(95% CI 12.3–15.3) ( Table 1 ) among
2,626 women in the 2013–2016 cycles of NHANES and was similar in each of
the two cycles (14.7% [95% CI 12.3–17.0] in 2013–2014 and 12.9%
[95% CI 11.1–14.8] in 2015–2016). Infertility prevalence increased
by age group: the prevalence among women 40–49 years of age was 3.3 times
the prevalence (95% CI 2.3–4.5) among women 18–29 years of age
( Table 1 ). By race/ethnicity,
non-Hispanic white women (15.4% [95% CI 13.0–17.8]) and non- Hispanic
black women (12.9% [95% CI 10.3–15.5]) had the highest infertility
prevalences, followed by Hispanic women (10.9% [95% CI 8.7–13.1]).
Compared to non-Hispanic white women, Hispanic women had a statistically
significantly lower infertility prevalence (PR 0.7 [95% CI 0.5–1.0],
p=0.03), whereas for non-Hispanic Asian women this comparison approached
statistical significance (PR 0.7 [95% CI 0.5–1.0], p=0.06) ( Table 1 ). Women with higher incomes and
greater educational attainment reported infertility more often than women with
lower incomes and less education ( Table
1 ).
Overall, the prevalence of infertility did not significantly differ by
having had a chlamydia diagnosis in the past 12 months, or Chlamydia
trachomatis or Trichomonas vaginalis NAAT
positivity at the time of exam ( Table 1 ).
The prevalence of infertility among women who reported a prior STD diagnosis was
17.1% (95% CI 13.1–21.1) and 13.0% (95% CI 11.2–14.7) for those
without a prior STD. Overall, women who reported a history of PID treatment had
an infertility prevalence of 24.2% (95% CI 16.2–32.2), which was 1.8
times the prevalence among women with no history of PID treatment (13.3% [95% CI
11.6–15.0]) ( Table 1 ).
Among women 18–29 years of age, Hispanic and non-Hispanic black
women had the highest prevalences of infertility (10.0% [95% CI
6.2–13.8%] and 10.6% [95% CI 6.7–14.5%], respectively). Among
women 40–49 years of age, non-Hispanic white and non-Hispanic Asian women
had the highest infertility prevalences (24.6% [95% CI 19.3–29.8] and
16.0% [95% CI 10.2–21.9], respectively. ( Figure 1 ). In looking at history of PID treatment among age groups,
the difference in infertility prevalence between women with and without reported
histories of PID treatment was most pronounced among 18–29 year old women
(PR 3.8 [95% CI 1.8–8.0]; 22.1% [95% CI 6.9–37.3] versus 5.8% [95%
CI 4.3–7.2] respectively) ( Figure
2 ).
Among the 327 women who self-reported infertility, the weighted
prevalence of reporting ever having sought healthcare for infertility was 60.9%
(95% CI 56.1–65.8). There was no difference in the prevalence of
healthcare seeking between the 2013–2014 and 2015–2016 cycles.
By age group, infertile women 18–29 years of age had the lowest
prevalence of seeking care for infertility (33.9%) and infertile women
30–39 years of age had the highest prevalence (70.8%) (PR 2.1 [95% CI
1.4–3.0]) ( Table 2 ). Non-Hispanic
black women were less likely to seek infertility-related healthcare than
non-Hispanic white women (PR 0.7 [95% CI 0.5–0.8]). Women with the lowest
family incomes were less likely to seek care than women with the highest incomes
(41.8% ([95% CI 29.6–54.1]) vs. 71.5% [95% CI 64.5–78.6],
respectively). Women with health insurance were more likely to have sought care
than women without insurance (64.3% [95% CI 58.9–69.7] vs. 45.4% [95% CI
35.5–55.3]) ( Table 2 ).
Materials
NHANES is a cross-sectional, nationally-representative, complex, multistage
survey to assess the general health status of the non-institutionalized U.S.
population( 12 ). Consenting participants
complete an interview questionnaire, undergo a physical exam, and submit biological
specimens for laboratory tests.
We analyzed data from the 2013–2014 and 2015–2016 NHANES
cycles from women of reproductive age (18–49 years of age) who were
sexually-experienced (defined as reporting ever having had vaginal sexual
intercourse with a man) to determine the weighted lifetime prevalence of
self-reported infertility. A lifetime history of infertility was defined as a
‘yes’ answer to the question: ‘Have you ever attempted to
become pregnant over a period of at least a year without becoming pregnant?’.
We also assessed healthcare seeking behavior among women who reported a history of
infertility, by the question: ‘Have you ever been to a doctor or other
medical provider because you have been unable to become pregnant?’. Hispanic
ethnicity was defined for women who reported being Mexican American or those who
reported being ‘other Hispanic’.
We analyzed demographic characteristics and characteristics obtained from
interview (including (A) self-reported history of chlamydia or gonorrhea in the past
12 months, (B) history of an STD diagnosis [chlamydia or gonorrhea in the past 12
months or having been told of a herpes, genital warts, or human papillomavirus
diagnosis], (C) self-reported history of PID treatment), and (D) laboratory factors,
including results of Chlamydia trachomatis or Trichomonas
vaginalis nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT)( 13 ) from a urine specimen collected at the time of
exam.
To account for the complex survey design, we used provided sampling weights
and estimated the weighted prevalence of infertility and infertility healthcare
seeking with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the combined 2013–2014 and
2015–2016 cycles. Furthermore, we estimated the prevalence ratios (PR) with
95% CI to compare the prevalence of infertility among subgroups of interest (e.g.,
age group, race/ethnicity, and women with STDs or PID).
P-values were calculated using the Rao-Scott chi-square test. We set a
statistical significance level at a P-value of less than 0.05. Relative standard
errors (RSE) were calculated. A calculated RSE of greater than 30% was highlighted
because this value is potentially unreliable and should be interpreted with caution
per NHANES guidance( 14 ).
The primary NHANES protocol has National Center for Health Statistics Ethics
Review Board approval. Informed consent is sought from participants, and data from
NHANES are publically available, thus no additional review was required before
obtaining the data and conducting the analysis( 12 ).
Discussion
In this first assessment of the population-based prevalence of infertility
using nationally-representative data from NHANES, we found that nearly 14% of U.S.
women aged 18–49 years during 2013–2016 had a self-reported lifetime
history of infertility. We found the prevalence of infertility was highest among
women who were older, were non-Hispanic white, and who reported higher incomes or
educational attainment. The prevalence of infertility was also higher in women with
a history of PID treatment compared to those without PID treatment. Among young
women, Hispanic and non-Hispanic black women had the highest prevalence of
infertility whereas among the oldest women, non-Hispanic white women had the highest
prevalence of infertility.
We found that self-reported PID treatment was associated with self-reported
infertility, and that this association was most pronounced among young women. Among
18–29 year old women, a history of PID was associated with a fourfold higher
prevalence of reported infertility. Chlamydia and gonorrhea, the most common known
causes of PID, are reported most frequently in young women 15–24 years of age
in the U.S.( 16 ). PID has also been found more
frequently in young women 20–24 years old in select populations( 17 , 18 ).
Although we did not observe an association between self-reported infertility and a
self-reported history of chlamydia or gonorrhea, it is possible that this lack of
association may be due to underreporting of these often asymptomatic and potentially
undiagnosed STDs. Additionally, other sexually transmitted microorganisms besides
chlamydia and gonorrhea, including Mycoplasma genitalium ,
Ureaplasmas, T. vaginalis , and proliferated organisms in the
vaginal microbiome have been implicated in the development of PID( 6 , 19 ).
Trichomonas has specifically been shown to be related to PID development among women
with HIV( 20 ). However, more research into the
etiology of PID and the potential role of various pathogens and conditions, such as
T. vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis, in causing PID and
infertility is needed. The high incidence of STDs and PID in young women along with
the observed significant relationship between PID and prevalence of infertility
suggest that STDs and subsequent PID could be a major reason for infertility in
young women. These data serve as reminders that PID-associated infertility can
affect young women.
It is possible that we did not see an association between PID and
infertility in older women because of the occurrence of non-PID related infertility
in addition to TFI in this age group. Another challenge that may preclude seeing an
association between STDs, lifetime PID, and lifetime infertility in older women in
particular in this cross-sectional analysis is that each of these factors may not
have occurred in the expected temporal sequence such that exposure to STDs and
subsequent PID occurred prior to experiencing a period of infertility.
The epidemiology of lifetime infertility by race/ethnicity in our sample
differs somewhat from what has previously been described, hinting at a changing
epidemiology. Whereas we found that prevalence of infertility was not significantly
different between non-Hispanic white women and non-Hispanic black women, prior work
demonstrated that non-Hispanic black women had a higher prevalence of current
infertility compared to non-Hispanic white women( 21 , 22 ). In 2006–2010 data
from the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG) among married and cohabiting women
aged 22–44 years, non-Hispanic black women were more likely (adjusted odds
ratio 1.8 [95% CI 1.1–3.1]) to report current infertility (lack of pregnancy
in prior 12 months despite condomless intercourse with a man each month) compared to
non-Hispanic white women( 23 ). However,
methodological differences may account for the differing results given that Chandra
et al. assessed current infertility versus lifetime infertility and used
multivariable regression modeling to adjust for age, parity, marital or cohabiting
status, education, and poverty.
In addition to the overall difference in infertility prevalence comparing
Non-Hispanic white to Hispanic women, we found differing infertility prevalences
across age groups. Our observation that the epidemiology of infertility by
race/ethnicity differs among age groups and that PID seems to be a contributing
factor among the youngest women suggests that there may be differing factors
contributing to infertility among different age groups. In the youngest women, where
we see that PID is related to lifetime infertility, differing epidemiology of PID
among race/ethnicity groups may contribute more to differing prevalences of
infertility by race. Among older women where PID does not appear to be a main factor
in infertility, other explanations for differing infertility prevalences among
race/ethnicity groups, such as deferred child bearing because of education or
employment opportunities, might play a role given reported differences in delayed
child bearing by race/ethnicity( 24 ). Further
epidemiological investigations to understand differences in the epidemiology of
infertility by age and race are warranted.
Nearly 40% of women who self-reported infertility did not seek healthcare
services for infertility. Notably, women without health insurance were significantly
less likely to seek infertility services than women with insurance. While we could
not explore specific reasons that women did not seek infertility-related healthcare,
it may be that lower socioeconomic status and lack of insurance establish sufficient
barriers to care, particularly in light of the considerable economic costs of
infertility treatment( 4 ).
Our analysis had limitations. Owing to the cross-sectional and self-reported
nature of the data, we cannot determine the temporal relationship between PID and
infertility. We are thus limited in our ability to draw causal inferences. Our
sample size prevented additional analyses requiring further stratifications, such as
by age group, race/ethnicity, and history of PID treatment thus we did not perform a
multivariable analysis or report on additional multilevel stratifications that would
be ideal to account for confounding factors. In our analysis, we did not find
overall differences in infertility prevalence among women with a history of selected
STDs or with chlamydia or gonorrhea diagnosis in the last 12 months. The absence of
the inclusion of any laboratory test for past infection (e.g. serology) or reported
history of chlamydia or gonorrhea exposure before the preceding 12 months within
NHANES limits our ability to assess for a relationship with these major contributors
to PID and a lifetime self-reported episode of infertility.
Using nationally-representative data collected during 2013–2016, we
found that 13.8% or nearly 1 in 7 U.S. women reported a lifetime history of
infertility and almost two-thirds sought infertility treatment. Among women who
reported a history of PID treatment, nearly 25% experienced infertility. To prevent
PID and PID-associated infertility, healthcare providers are encouraged to follow
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and United States Preventive Services
Task Force recommendations for annual chlamydia and gonorrhea screening for all
women younger than 25 years old, and women with high-risk behaviors older than 25
years( 19 , 25 ). Ensuring access to screening and following recommendations for
annual chlamydia and gonorrhea screening may reduce PID-related infertility. These
data serve as reminders of the important reproductive health sequelae of bacterial
STDs. We hope that these findings reinvigorate efforts to better understand the
epidemiology and etiology of PID and infertility, and to reinforce approaches to
avert preventable causes of infertility.
Introduction
Infertility, or the inability to conceive a child in a 12-month period,
affected an estimated 6.7% of women in the United States during
2011–2015( 1 ) and can be associated
with psychosocial morbidity, including depression and anxiety( 2 , 3 ). Healthcare
costs associated with treatment for infertility can be considerable, given that a
cycle of in vitro fertilization (IVF) is estimated to cost $12,400( 4 ). Female factors in infertility include oocyte aging,
ovulatory disorders, tubal and uterine factors (e.g. tubal damage, pelvic adhesions,
and endometriosis), and other factors( 5 ).
Tubal factor infertility (TFI) is often caused by sexually transmitted
diseases (STDs), notably chlamydia and gonorrhea. These infections may lead to
symptomatic or asymptomatic pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) characterized by tubal
inflammation and scarring. In the 1980s chlamydia surpassed gonorrhea as the
organism most commonly isolated from women with PID( 6 ). Historically, up to 5% of untreated chlamydial infections cause PID
in the first few weeks after infection( 7 ). In
the year after untreated chlamydia infection, 9.5% of women developed PID( 8 ); however, as many as 30% of women have
developed PID after concurrent gonococcal and chlamydial infection( 9 ). Once women have PID, up to 15–20% subsequently
develop infertility( 7 ) with a large proportion
of this infertility being TFI( 10 ).
Infertility due to STDs is preventable. To this end, public health agencies
have supported programs to improve STD prevention and early detection( 11 ). Current data on the epidemiology of
infertility may help to guide public health efforts. Questions about infertility
were first included in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES)
in the 2013–2014 cycle. We estimate the prevalence of self-reported lifetime
infertility and infertility healthcare seeking in a nationally representative sample
from the 2013–2016 cycles of NHANES to describe the current epidemiology of
infertility in the United States.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.