Gynaecological robotic surgery at a state hospital — our own experience
This study analyzed 40 patients undergoing robotic gynecological surgery from 2015-2017, detailing operative times, blood loss, hospital stay, and complication rates, finding robotic surgery invaluable for specific gynecological conditions.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This retrospective case series reports experience with robotic-assisted gynaecological surgery in a state hospital, analyzing 40 patients treated between 2015 and 2017 using the Da Vinci XI and recording age, BMI, previous abdominal operations, indications, operative and docking/console times, uterine weight, blood loss, complications, and duration of hospitalization. The most common indications were uterine fibroids (52%) and abnormal uterine bleeding (45%), with mean operative time 166 minutes and mean blood loss 93 mL; perioperative complications occurred in 10% and postoperative complications in 20%, with a mean hospital stay of 4 days. The authors explicitly acknowledge that their conclusions are limited by being based on a small, single-center experience rather than a controlled comparison. The paper’s relevance to endometriosis is mentioned in its conclusion, which states robotic-assisted surgery is invaluable in cases of endometriosis, among other scenarios, though the study itself is a general robotic surgery experience.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
4,959 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· 6 sections
· click to expand
Abstract
Material and methods
Results
Conclusions
Keywords
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
- Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease 2013
- Advances on minimally invasive approach for benign total hysterectomy: a systematic review 2017
Cited by (2)
References (22)
- Advances on minimally invasive approach for benign total hysterectomy: a systematic review via openalex
- Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Disease via openalex
- W1993790913 via openalex
- W1995697876 via openalex
- W2013471907 via openalex
- W2031896156 via openalex
- W2057152543 via openalex
- W2071035245 via openalex
- W2087538079 via openalex
- W2111188706 via openalex
- W2112004388 via openalex
- W2150545026 via openalex
- W2164803605 via openalex
- W2285533029 via openalex
- W2302011179 via openalex
- W2510074539 via openalex
- W2521776194 via openalex
- W4252494717 via openalex
- W4256123062 via openalex
- W1195649932 via openalex
- W4288400169 via openalex
- W1970501873 via openalex
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-09-12T06:55:35.949492+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:19:31.300640+00:00