Direct intraperitoneal insemination and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in subfertile couples

In: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · 1994 · vol. 11(4) , pp. 189–192 · doi:10.1007/bf02211807 · PMID:7711381 · W1968313427
article OA: closed CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-13

Direct intraperitoneal insemination with superovulation and washed spermatozoa was performed in 162 couples, yielding pregnancy rates of 21.9% for cervical factor, 20.9% for idiopathic infertility, 4.9% for oligospermia, and 15.5% for ovulatory dysfunction.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13 · read from full text

The paper evaluated direct intraperitoneal insemination combined with superovulation using washed husband sperm in 162 subfertile couples across 360 cycles, addressing infertility due to oligospermia, cervical subfertility, ovulatory dysfunction, or idiopathic causes. Pregnancy rates per couple were 21.9% for cervical-factor infertility, 20.9% for idiopathic infertility, 4.9% for oligospermia, and 15.5% for ovulatory dysfunction, with an overall pregnancy rate of 33.3% per all couples and 15.0% per all cycles. The main limitation explicitly reflected by the design is that the outcomes are reported by infertility subgroup without any randomized comparison to other assisted reproduction strategies. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 5,280 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 4 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Method We performed direct intraperitoneal insemination in combination with superovulation and washed husband's spermatozoa as the treatment of infertility caused by oligospermia, cervical subfertility, or ovulatory dys-function or idiopathic infertility in 162 couples during 360 cycles.

Results

The pregnancy rate per couple was 21.9% in the cervical-factor group, 20.9% in the idiopathic group, 4.9% in the oligospermia group, and 15.5% in the ovulatory dysfunction group.

Conclusion

The pregnancy rate was 33.3% for all couples and 15.0% for all cycles. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Lopata A, Patullo MJ, Chang A, James B: A method for collecting motile spermatozoa from human semen. Fertil Steril 1976;27:677–684 Manhes H, Hermahessiere J: Fécondation intra-péritonéale. Première grossesse obtenue sur indication masculine. Oral presentation, 3rd International Forum Andrology, Paris, June 1985 Forrler A, Dallenbach P, Nisand I, Moreau L, Cranz C, Clavert A, Rumpler Y: Direct intraperitoneal insemination in unexplained and cervical infertility. Lancet 1986;1:916–917 Seracchioli R, Melega C, Maccolini A, Cattoli M, Bulletti C, Bovicelli L, Flamigni C: Pregnancy after direct intraperitoneal insemination. Hum Reprod 1991;6:533–536 Arici A, Byrd W, Bradshaw K, Kutteh WH, Marshburn P, Carr BR: Evaluation of clomiphene citrate and human chorionic gonadotropin treatment: A prospective, randomized, crossover study during intrauterine insemination cycles. Fertil Steril 1994;61:314–318 Belaisch-Allart JC, Frydman R, Testart J, Guillet-Rosso F, Lassale B, Volante M, Papiernik E: In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program in Clamart, France. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transf 1984;1:51–55 Testart J, Amiel ML: Contribution of preovulatory-phase small follicles to the ovarian response in stimulated cycles. Hum Reprod 1991;6:823–827 Menezo Y: Milieu synthétique pour la survie et la maturation des gamètes et pour la culture de l'∄uf fécondé. CR Acad Sci (D) (Paris) 1976;282:1967–1970 World Health Organization (WHO): Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Semen-Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987 Fishel SB, Edwards RG, Purdy JM, Steptoe PC, Webster J, Walters E, Cohen J, Fehilly C, Hewitt J, Rowland G: Implantation aboration and birth after in vitro fertilization using the natural menstrual cycle or follicular stimulation with clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotropin. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1985;2:123–131 Serhal PF, Katz M, Little V, Woronowski H: Unexplained infertility—the value of Pergonal superovulation combined with intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1988;49:602–606 Horbay GLA, Cowell CA, Casper RF: Multiple follicular recruitment and intrauterine insemination outcomes compared by age and diagnosis. Hum Reprod 1991;6:947–952 Karlström PO, Bakos O, Palmstierna M, Bergh T, Lundkvist ö: Direct intraperitoneal insemination-clinical results and comparisons between two methods of sperm preparation. Fertil Steril 1991;56:939–945 Dickey RP, Olar TT, Taylor DN, Curole DN, Rye PH: Sequential clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin for ovulation induction: Comparison to clomiphene citrate alone and human menopausal gonadotrophin alone. Hum Reprod 1993;8:56–59 Dodson WC, Whiteside DB, Huges CL, Easley H, Haney AF: Superovulation with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility: A possible alternative to gamete of intrafallopian transfer andin vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1987;48:441–445 Dodson WC, Haney AF: Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination for treatment of infertility. Fertil Steril 1991;55:457–467 Jenkins DM, O'Donavan P: Direct intraperitoneal insemination. Lancet 1988;1:655 Wittemer C, Menard A, Moreau L, Dellanbach P: The present perspectives of direct intraperitoneal insemination.In Advances in Assisted Reproductive Technologies, S Mashiach, Z Ben-Rafael, N Laufer, JG Schenker (eds). New York, Plenum Press, 1990, p 259 Crosignani PG, Ragni G, Finzi GCL, De Lauretis L, Olivares MD, Perotti L: Intraperitoneal insemination in the treatment of male and unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1991;55:333–337 Compos-Lietz E, Insull M, Kennedy SH, Ellis JD, Sargeant I, Barlow DH: A controlled assessment of direct intraperitoneal insemination. Fertil Steril 1992;57:168–173 Thurhan Nö, Artini PG, D'Ambrogio G, Droghini F, Volpe A, Genazzani AR: Studies on direct intraperitoneal insemination in the management of male factor, cervical factor, unexplained and immunological infertility. Hum Reprod 1992;7:66–77 Cimino C, Guestalla G, Comparetto G, Gullo D, Perino A, Beningno MA, Barba G, Cittadini E: Direct intraperitoneal insemination (DIPI) for the treatment of refractory infertility unrelated to female organic pelvic disease. Acta Eur Fertil 1988; 19:61–68 Author information Authors and Affiliations Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Rhouma, K.B., Miled, E.B., Marzouk, A.B. et al. Direct intraperitoneal insemination and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in subfertile couples. J Assist Reprod Genet 11, 189–192 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211807 Received: Accepted: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02211807

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (1)

References (26)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK