Deep Retraction Pockets, Endometriosis, and Quality of Life

Patrick P Yeung, P.P. Yeung, Ian Logan, Jeffrey A Gavard
Frontiers in public health · 2016 · vol. 4 , pp. 85 · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2016.00085 · PMID:27242981 · W2346775587
article OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 7 in-corpus citations
🔓 Open OA copy View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

This study found that excision of deep retraction pockets (DRPs) in endometriosis patients improved pain and quality of life, demonstrating DRPs can manifest as endometriosis even without visible lesions.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

This prospective cohort study examined whether deep retraction pockets (DRPs) in the posterior cul-de-sac and uterosacral ligaments represent a manifestation of endometriosis and whether laparoscopic excision of these pockets improves pain symptoms and quality of life in 107 women with preoperative deep dyspareunia, using prospective symptom/QoL measures and histologic confirmation of excised lesions. Endometriosis was confirmed in 82.2% of women overall, and 48.4% of excised DRPs (15/31) showed endometriosis on histology, including 30.0% of DRPs without visible surface lesions. Pain outcomes (deep dyspareunia, dyschezia, chronic pelvic pain) and quality of life improved significantly after excision regardless of DRP presence, with additional significant improvements reported specifically among women whose DRPs contained endometriosis. A key limitation was incomplete postoperative follow-up (questionnaire completed by 49.5% of participants), which may affect interpretation of outcome changes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it evaluates DRPs as a possible manifestation of endometriosis and links excision to improvements in pain and quality of life.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine if deep retraction pockets (DRPs) in the posterior cul-de-sac and uterosacral ligaments could be a manifestation of endometriosis and if excision of these pockets improves pain symptoms and quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study Canadian Task Force Classification, II-3. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative data, operative data, and follow-up data were collected prospectively at the Center for Endometriosis at Saint Louis University, a referral center for the surgical management of endometriosis. RESULTS: The 107 consecutive patients who presented with preoperative deep dyspareunia were included in the study, and the median postoperative follow-up was 13 months. Endometriosis was confirmed histologically in any location excised in 88/107 (82.2%) of the women, and 31 DRPs were excised from 25 women with DRPs in the posterior cul-de-sac or uterosacral ligaments, of which 15/31 (48.4%) had endometriosis. Of the 10 DRPs without visible surface lesions, 3 (30.0%) had endometriosis on histology. Pain symptoms and quality of life significantly improved after excision surgery, whether or not DRPs were present. Women who had endometriosis in their DRP also had significant improvement in deep dyspareunia and chronic pelvic pain and quality of life. Results did not differ when patients who took postoperative hormonal suppression were removed from the analyses. CONCLUSION: Patients had significantly improved pain symptoms and quality of life after excision surgery, whether or not DRPs were present. This study demonstrated that a DRP may be a manifestation of endometriosis (even with a clear surface of the pocket), so that DRPs should be excised to achieve optimal excision of endometriosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosischronic_pelvic_paindyspareunia

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (13)

Cited by (7)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:21:00.404924+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK