Effectiveness of the proposed complex, step-by-step personalized conservative therapy in women of reproductive age in patients with combined uterine pathology – leiomyoma and adenomyosis
A complex, step-by-step personalized conservative therapy for leiomyoma and adenomyosis in women of reproductive age was significantly more effective than standard therapy after one year of treatment.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
This study investigated the effectiveness of a complex, step-by-step personalized conservative therapy in women of reproductive age with combined uterine pathology due to leiomyoma and adenomyosis, comparing outcomes with traditional therapy. In an analysis of 120 patients, 60 received standard treatment and 60 received the proposed regimen that combined hormonal and drugs aimed at normalizing metabolic processes (including vitamins and macro-/microelements), with follow-up assessment after 1 year. The proposed approach reduced the frequency of clinical symptoms, menstrual dysfunction, genital and extragenital pathology, laboratory findings, and instrumental examination results by markedly greater amounts than standard therapy, with all reported comparisons statistically significant (e.g., up to 3.3 times overall, p<0.001). The paper’s main limitation is that it compares two treatment strategies but does not describe detailed randomization or blinding in the provided text. This paper is centrally about adenomyosis — it evaluates a personalized conservative therapy specifically for women with leiomyoma and adenomyosis.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Full text
3,734 characters
· extracted from
oa-html
· 2 sections
· click to expand
Materials
References
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cited by (2)
Cited by (2)
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00