Combined Cystoscopic-Abdominal Versus Abdominal-Only Route for Complete Excision of Large Deep Endometriosis Nodules Infiltrating the Supratrigonal Area of the Bladder: A Comparative Study

Horace Roman, Sophia Braund, Braund S, Hennetier C, Clotilde Hennetier, Olivier Celhay, Celhay O, O. Celhay, Pasquier G, Geoffroy Pasquier, Kade S, Sandesh Kade, Thomas Dennis, Dennis T, Merlot B, Benjamin Merlot
Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2024 · vol. 31(4) , pp. 295–303 · doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2024.01.007 · PMID:38244721 · W4391017567
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This study compared the combined cystoscopic-abdominal approach to the abdominal-only route for completely excising large deep endometriosis nodules in the supratrigonal area of the bladder.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Surgical excision of large deep endometriosis nodules infiltrating the bladder may be challenging, particularly when the nodule limits are close to the trigone and ureteral orifice. Bladder nodules have classically been approached abdominally. However, combining a cystoscopic with an abdominal approach may help to better identify the mucosal borders of the lesion to ensure complete excision without unnecessary resection of healthy bladder. This study aimed to compare classical excision of large bladder nodules by abdominal route with a combined cystoscopic-abdominal approach. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study on data prospectively recorded in a database. Patients were managed from September 2009 to June 2022. SETTING: Two tertiary referral endometriosis centers. PATIENTS: A total of 175 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the bladder more than 2 cm undergoing surgical excision of bladder nodules. INTERVENTIONS: Excision of bladder nodules by either abdominal or combined cystoscopic-abdominal approaches. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 141 women (80.6%) were managed by abdominal route and 34 women (19.4%) underwent a combined cystoscopic-abdominal approach. In 99.4% of patients, the approach was minimally invasive. Patients with nodules requiring the combined approach had a lower American Fertility Society revised score and endometriosis stage and less associated digestive tract nodules, but larger bladder nodules. They were less frequently associated with colorectal resection and preventive stoma. Operative time was comparable. The rate of early postoperative complications was comparable (8.8% vs 22%), as were the rates of ureteral fistula (2.2% vs 2.9%), bladder fistula (2.2% vs 0), and vesicovaginal fistula (0.7% vs 2.9%). CONCLUSION: In our opinion, the combined cystoscopic-abdominal approach is useful in patients with large bladder nodules with limits close to the trigone and ureteral orifice. These large deep bladder nodules seemed paradoxically associated to less nodules on the digestive tract, resulting in an overall comparable total operative time and complication rate.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (18)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-08-07T06:07:27.085738+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-08-07T06:05:58.993929+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK