Results of a Prospective Comparative Study of Transvaginal Hydrolaparoscopy and Chromolaparoscopy in the Diagnostics of Infertility
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 9 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary
Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy demonstrated high success in detecting tubal factors and adhesions compared to chromolaparoscopy, but was less effective for endometriosis.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (THL) was evaluated in comparison with the already established chromolaparoscopy in the detection of tubal factors, adhesions as well as endometriosis. 43 infertile patients without previous pelvic operations and with an inconspicuous clinical examination were included in a prospective comparative study of THL and chromolaparoscopy. THL succeeded in 40 patients (93.0%). Both methods showed 100% agreement with regard to tubal factors and adhesions. However, only 72/80 tubes (90.0%) could be portrayed by THL. In contrast to this, THL failed to identify 8 of 10 laparoscopically verified endometrioses (isolated endometriosis of the bladder peritoneum in 2). No complications occurred with THL. THL could be the method of choice for the clarification of mechanical infertility factors in symptom-free patients with no suspicion of pelvic pathologies. Tubal pathologies and/or adhesions (visible during THL) should be indications for laparoscopy. In the case of inconspicuous genitals during THL and a still unfulfilled desire for offspring postoperatively, laparoscopy should be considered in order to exclude the possibility of unidentified endometriosis. Retroflexio uteri should at least be a relative contraindication for THL. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the role of THL in the diagnostic concept of infertility in the future.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
MeSH descriptors
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (10)
- Culdoscopy via openalex
- Laparoscopic Surgery in Infertile Women with Minimal or Mild Endometriosis via openalex
- Laparoscopy Versus Culdoscopy in the Investigation of Infertility via openalex
- Office transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy for early diagnosis of pelvic endometriosis and adhesions via openalex
- Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy compared with laparoscopy for the evaluation of infertile women: a prospective comparative blind study via openalex
- W2477008945 via openalex
- W2121181978 via openalex
- W2165936652 via openalex
- W2402387848 via openalex
- W2413921452 via openalex
Cited by (9)
- Transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and laparoscopy 2019
- Performance of outpatient transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy 2016
- Rationale of first-line endoscopy-based fertility exploration using transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy and minihysteroscopy 2012
- Transvaginal Hydrolaparoscopy: Practices in French Teaching Hospitals 2008
- Major complications and outcome of diagnostic and operative transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy 2007
- Complex one-stop investigation of infertility: transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy 2006
- Usefulness and prognostic value of transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy in infertile women 2003
- Transvaginal Laparoscopy 2003
- Ovarian endometriosis and peritoneal endometriosis: are they different entities from a fertility perspective? 2002
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:13:19.284922+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK