Effect on biochemical vasoactive markers during postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy: estradiol versus estradiol/dienogest

In: Maturitas · 2001 · vol. 38(3) , pp. 305–313 · doi:10.1016/s0378-5122(01)00169-4 · PMID:11358648 · W1986715207
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 8 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

ObjectivesAim was to compare the effects of estradiol-only therapy with combined estradiol/progestin treatment on the excretion of vasoactive mediators surrogating on possible effects in the vascular system. The progestin used was dienogest, a new C19-progestin with antiandrogenic properties.MethodsProspective, randomized trial, 25 healthy postmenopausal women treated for 3 months with estradiol valerate (2 mg/day) and 27 women with estradiol valerate (2 mg/day) continuously combined with dienogest (2 mg/day). Assessment of the following markers or their stable metabolites in nocturnal urine: cGMP, serotonin, prostacyclin and thromboxane, and urodilatin.ResultsEstradiol alone increased the excretion of cGMP and serotonin significantly suggesting vasodilating effects. The prostacyclin/thromboxane ratio known to be crucial for the relation of vasorelaxation to vasoconstriction significantly increased. No significant changes were found for urodilatin, which is known to elicit different effects in the cardiovascular and renal system, respectively. Combined estradiol/dienogest therapy also led to significant increases in cGMP and serotonin excretion suggesting that progestin addition for three months does not affect these markers. However, in contrast to estrogen-only treatment, there was no significant increase for the prostacyclin/thromboxane ratio, which can be explained by antagonistic action of the progestin. The excretion of urodilatin was increased significantly, which might be due to counterbalancing progestin effects in the renal vascular system.ConclusionsThe changes in vasoactive markers suggest an estrogen effect that is vasorelaxant. Since there were no significant differences between the two groups, possible vascular effects of the progestin dienogest, for the first time evaluated, might not be of clinical relevance, at least not in women without cardiovascular diseases.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (36)

Cited by (8)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-05-14T06:03:08.038466+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK