Should Sonographers Be Certified to Perform Endometriosis Ultrasound?

Emma Jardine, Paula Kinnane
In: Sonography · 2026 · vol. 13(2) · doi:10.1002/sono.70078 · W7164153184
Other OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-06-28 ⓘ

This commentary explores whether formal certification for sonographers in endometriosis ultrasound is needed to address variable training and inconsistent practice in Australasia.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

ABSTRACT Endometriosis is an increasingly recognised health condition associated with significant diagnostic delay and ongoing morbidity. Ultrasound plays a central role in early assessment and surgical planning. However, comprehensive endometriosis imaging requires advanced technical expertise that extends beyond routine pelvic examination. Across Australasia, variability in training, experience, and access to mentorship contributes to inconsistent practice, particularly outside specialist centres. Although many sonographers are formally qualified to perform gynaecological ultrasound, relatively few have dedicated subspecialisation in advanced endometriosis assessment. This commentary explores whether a formal certification framework for endometriosis ultrasound may help address these gaps.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood (2-hop)

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. Outer rings show 2-hop neighbours — papers reached through the immediate citers/citees. [ collapse to 1-hop ]

References (19)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-08-31T06:00:52.054077+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK