Dor pélvica e achados indiretos da endometriose na ecografia pélvica: Uma correlação estatística

In: Research, Society and Development · 2021 · vol. 10(8) , pp. e49210817709 · doi:10.33448/rsd-v10i8.17709 · W3185758675
article OA: diamond CC0 ⤵ 4 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07

This study found that ultrasound detected indirect signs suggestive of endometriosis in 79 out of 87 women presenting with chronic pelvic pain.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

The paper studied the prevalence of women presenting chronic pelvic pain and the proportion with pelvic ultrasound findings suggestive of endometriosis, along with the most frequent ultrasound changes and their stratification by age, using retrospective documentary data from a private clinic (Clínica Valle Imagem) in Itaporanga, Brazil. Among 87 women with pelvic pain signs such as chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia, and infertility, 79 showed ultrasound changes suggestive of endometriosis/adenomyosis. The authors note a key limitation that ultrasound is not the best diagnostic method for endometriosis compared with MRI and laparoscopy, and the conclusion emphasizes ultrasound’s practicality rather than definitive diagnosis. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it evaluates the statistical correlation between pelvic pain and indirect ultrasound findings suggestive of endometriosis (and mentions adenomyosis in the clinical sign context).

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Objetivo: Identificar a prevalência de mulheres com dor pélvica, quantas têm achados que sugerem endometriose na USG e os achados de endometriose mais frequentes e estratificação da prevalência dessas alterações ecográficas pela faixa etária. Metodologia: Trata-se uma pesquisa documental e que avalia a prevalência de quantas mulheres com dor pélvica crônica tem achados indiretos de endometriose na ecografia, possuindo, dessa forma, uma abordagem quantitativa. Tendo como local de estudo uma clínica particular chamada Clínica Valle Imagem na cidade de Itaporanga – Paraíba, contemplando a população de 87 mulheres com dor pélvica. Os instrumentos de coletas foram dados de laudos e prontuários médicos dos exames de ultrassonografia das pacientes com dor pélvica. Resultados: Foi observado que as 87 mulheres que apresentavam sinais clínicos de endometriose/adenomiose como dor pélvica crônica, dispareunia e infertilidade, 79 apresentavam alterações na ecografia que sugeriam endometriose. Conclusão: Embora a USG não seja o melhor método de diagnóstico de endometriose, já que a RM e laparoscopia são as de primeira escolha, a USG é sim um método útil para avaliação de pacientes com dor pélvica crônica pela sua disponibilidade, baixo custo e ser um método inócuo e pouco invasivo.
Full text 7,572 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Objective

To identify the prevalence of women with pelvic pain, how many have findings suggestive of endometriosis on USG, and the most frequent endometriosis findings and stratification of the prevalence of these ultrasound changes by age group.. Methodology: This is a documentary research that assesses the prevalence of how many women with chronic pelvic pain have indirect findings of endometriosis on ultrasound, thus having a quantitative approach, having as place of study a private clinic called Clínica Valle Imagem in the city of Itaporanga - Paraíba, comprising a population of 87 women with pelvic pain. The collection instruments were data from reports and medical records of ultrasound exams of patients with pelvic pain. Results: It was observed that of the 87 women who presented clinical signs of endometriosis/adenomyosis such as chronic pelvic pain, dyspareunia and infertility, 79 presented changes on ultrasound that suggested endometriosis. Conclusion: Although USG is not the best method to diagnose endometriosis, since MRI and laparoscopy are the first choice, USG is a useful method for evaluation of patients with chronic pelvic pain because of its availability, low cost, and because it is innocuous and minimally invasive.

References

Augusto, K. L. (2019). Manifestações clínicas relacionadas a endometriose em pacientes de um serviço de referência do estado do ceará. Journal of Coloproctology, 39(1), 147-148. Carmo, C. O. D. (2016). Ressonância Magnética e Ultrassonografia Transvaginal na endometriose profunda: revisão sistemática. Carneiro, E. C. S. P., Silva, R. M. C. R. A., Pereira, E. R., Vallois, E. C., Chicaro S. C. R., & Lima, M. M. S. (2019). Dor pélvica crônica feminina em relato de experiência: o singular norteando condutas. Nursing (Säo Paulo), 22(253), 2995-2998. Clemente, A. G. M., Laureano, L. G., Yano, J. P. P., Evangelista, P. G., Amaral, W. N., Batista, L. A. A., & Silva, W. R. (2018). Ultrassonografia transvaginal com preparo intestinal em pacientes com suspeita clínica de endometriose. Rev Bras de Ultrassonografia, 24, 7-10. Cruz, R. C. L., Amaral, W. N., & Amaral Filho, W. N. (2010). Diagnóstico ultrassonográfico da endometriose pelvica. Rev Goiana de Medicina, 39(1), 14-16. Florentino, A. V. A., Pereira, A. M. G., Martins, J. A., Lopes, R. G. C., & Arruma, R. M. (2019). Quality of Life Assessment by the Endometriosis Health Profile (EHP-30) Questionnaire Prior to Treatment for Ovarian Endometriosis in Brazilian Women. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet, 41(9), 548-554. Guerriero, S., Conway, F., Pascual, M. A., Graupera, B., Ajossa, S., Neri, M., Musa, E., Pedrassani, M., & Alcazar, J. L. (2020). Ultrasonography and Atypical Sites of Endometriosis. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 10(6), 345. Habib, N., Centini, G., Lazzeri, L., Amoruso, N., Khoury, L. E., Zupi, E., & Afors, K. (2020). Bowel Endometriosis: Current Perspectives on Diagnosis and Treatment. International journal of women's health, 12, 35–47. Luz, R. A., Rodrigues, F. M., Vila, V. S. C., Deus, J. M., & Conde, D. M. (2016). Qualidade de vida de mulheres com dor pélvica crônica. Rev. Eletr. Enferm, 17(3). Morais, J. P., Tim, C. R., & Assis, L. (2020). Considerations about the use of ozone therapy (O3) in the treatment of Endometriosis. Research, Society and Development, 9, (9), e403997616. Moura, A. P. C., Ribeiro, H. S. A. A., Bernardo, W. M., Simões, R., Torres, U. S., D'Ippolito, G., Bazot, M., & Ribeiro, P. A. A. G. (2019). Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one, 14(4), e0214842. Mussi, R. F. F., Mussi, L. M. P. T., Assunção, E. T. C., & Nunes, C. P. (2020). Pesquisa Quantitativa e/ou Qualitativa: distanciamentos, aproximações e possibilidades. Revista Sustinere, 7(2), 414 – 430. Nisenblat, V., Bossuyt, P. M. M., Farquhar, C., Johnson, N., & Hull, M. L. (2016). "Modalidades de imagem para o diagnóstico não invasivo da endometriose." O banco de dados Cochrane de revisões sistemáticas, 2(2) CD009591. Oliveira, J. G. A., Bonfada, V., Figueiró, M. F., Mungnol, T., Zanella, J. F. P., & Coser, J. (2018). Clinical features, socio-demographic profile and ultrasound findings in women with endometriosis symptoms. Sci Med, 28 (4), ID30496. Oliveira, J. G. A., Bonfada, V., Zanella, J. F. P., & Coser, J. (2019). Ultrassonografia transvaginal na endometriose profunda: ensaio iconográfico. Radiol Bras, 52(5), 337-341. Reid, S., & George C. (2017). “Update on the ultrasound diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis.” European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 209, 50-54. Rocha, J. N., Castro, L. E., Riccobene, V. M., Autran, M. S. M., Nogueira, L. A. C., & Reis, F. J. J. (2020). Intensidade da dor, incapacidade funcional e fatores psicossociais em mulheres com dor pélvica crônica: um estudo transversal. BrJP, 3(3) ,239-244. Soares, R. M., & Costa, J. I. F. (2018). Achados ultrassonográficos da endometriose: principais apresentações e aspectos atípicos – ensaio iconográfico. Rev Med UFC, 58(4), 52-56. Tomás, C., & Metello, J. L. (2019). Endometriose e infertilidade-onde estamos? Acta Obstétrica e Ginecológica Portuguesa, 13(4), 235-241. Tomiyoshi, M. M., Lima, D. M. R., Kurachi, G., Sagae, U. E., Emori, F., & Bazzano, B. (2020). Correlation between findings of nuclear magnetic resonance and 3D anorectal ultrasound in patients with suspected deep endometriosis. J. Coloproctol, 40(3), 243-246. Vieira, G. C. D., Silva, J. A. C., Padilha, R. T., & Padilha, D. M. M. (2020). Endometriose: causas, implicações e tratamento da infertilidade feminina através das técnicas de reprodução assistida. Research, Society and Development, 9(10), e685910912. Yela, D. A., Quagliato, I. P., & Pinto, C. L. B. (2020). Quality of Life in Women with Deep Endometriosis: A Cross-Sectional Study. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet, 42(2), 90-95. Zhang, X., He, T., & Shen, W. (2020). Comparison of physical examination, ultrasound techniques and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep infiltrating endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 20(4), 3208–3220. Downloads Published Issue Section License Copyright (c) 2021 Izabele Ferreira Pontes; Emerson Lopes Claudino This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: 1) Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 2) Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. 3) Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (18)

Cited by (4)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK