Intro
An important issue in assisted reproductive techniques
(ART) is how many embryos could be transferred
for each couple. A number of variables considered
for a high success rate in in vitro fertilization
(IVF) treatment may be followed by a high rate of
multiple pregnancies. Over 30% of IVF pregnancies
are multiples which are associated with increasing
maternal and infant morbidity and mortality such as
( 1 , 2 ) hypertension, polyhydramnios, premature labor,
( 1 ) low birth weight, higher perinatal mortality
and congenital anomalies ( 1 ). Therefore, it is crucial
to find proper methods to reduce multiple pregnancies
without reducing the overall pregnancy rate.
Despite recent recommendations for achieving acceptable
pregnancy rate with few multiple pregnancies,
one or two good quality embryos needs to be
considered for transfer ( 3 - 6 ), but still in some countries
including Iran, patients have an impression that
increasing the number of embryos transferred is associated
with increased pregnancy rate.
Some studies have reported elective singleembryo
transfer (eSET) in IVF-intracytoplasmic
sperm injection (ICSI) cycles prevents multiple
pregnancies without reduction of overall pregnancy
rate ( 3 , 4 , 6 ), while some other studies believe
that eSET could be associated with a lower pregnancy
rate per cycle, especially in an unselected
population ( 5 , 7 , 8 ). Despite the efforts have been
made in order to limit the incidence of multiple
pregnancies after ART (e.g. by SET), the average
IVF treatment includes transfer of two, three
or sometimes even more embryos into the uterus,
while use of eSET in clinical practice has not yet
been performed. This may be due to the factors
influencing the number of embryos transferred
such as cost-effectiveness of eSET technique, professional
attitudes and the financial situation of
couples. In a recent systematic review, Pandian
et al. ( 8 ) reported that insufficient data are available
on the outcome of two versus three and four
ETs policies. In Iran and some other parts of the
world where no legal restrictions exist, this is the
responsibility of infertility specialists and patients
to make decision about the number of embryos
transferred with respect to the risks associated
with multiple gestations and acceptable pregnancy
rates. A recent guideline stating the suitable number
of embryos to transfer following an IVF cycle
suggests that a maximum of three or four embryos
can be transferred in women over the age of 39 ( 9 ).
The primary purpose of the present study was
to investigate whether increasing the number of
embryos transferred from two to three leads to an
increase in the overall pregnancy and live birth
rates in women undergoing ICSI cycles, then the
secondary objective was to evaluate the impact of
maternal age on the outcome of IVF/ICSI according
to the number of embryos transferred.
Results
A total of 387 patients were included in this
study, among whom 193 patients with two ETs and
194 patients with three ETs. Pregnancy outcomes
were compared between ET2 and ET3 groups.
The demographic characteristics are demonstrated
in table 1 . Two groups had no difference in
terms of infertility diagnosis, women’s BMI, infertility
duration and the number of previous ART cycles.
The mean of maternal age in ET2 group was
significantly higher than ET3 group (P<0.001).
Demographic characteristics of women according to
the number of embryos transferred (ET)
SD; Standard deviation and BMI; Body mass index.
The mean total dose of rFSH, duration of gonadotropin
administration, and the number of MII
oocyes were similar between two groups (P=0.7,
P=0.6 and P=0.3, respectively). Furthermore, the
mean number of oocytes retrieved and total embryos
were significantly higher in ET3 group compared
to the ET2 group (P=0.001, Table 2 ). Chisquare
test showed that the percent of patients with
Grade C ET in ET3 group was higher significantly
(P=0.02).
Our results showed that pregnancy rates in patients
with two and three ETs were similar (P=0.7).
There was also no significant differences in terms
of live birth (P=0.4), miscarriage and intrauterine
death rate between two groups. Multiple pregnancy
rate was significantly higher in the ET3 group compared to ET2 group ( Table 3 ).
The cut point for maternal age obtained by
ROC analysis for clinical pregnancy rate was 33
years. Logistic regression analysis revealed that
only age was predictable for clinical pregnancy
rate in stimulating ICSI cycles [Odds ratio (OR):
1.6, Confidence interval (CI):1.05-2.8] ( Table 4 ).
Furthermore, logistic regression analysis for predictive
factors of live birth rate showed that the
quality of transferred embryos and number of ET
were significantly predictable, so that the quality
of ET was directly related to the live birth, but the
number of ET had an inverse relationship with this
variable ( Table 5 ).
As shown in table 6 , live birth rates were similar
between ET2 and ET3 in women younger and
older than 33 years old. Therefore, a reduction in
number of embryos transferred did not decrease
the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in both
age levels.
Characteristics of ICSI cycles of study population according to the number of embryos transferred (ET)
Data are presented as mean ± SD. ICSI; Intracytoplsamic sperm injection, SD; Standard deviation and M2; Metaphase II.
ICSI outcomes according to the number of embryos transferred (ET)
*NS; Not significant, ICSI; Intracytoplsamic sperm injection and SD; Standard deviation.
Logistic regression analysis for predicting the clinical pregnancy rate in ICSI cycles
ICSI; Intracytoplsamic sperm injection, OR; Odds ratio and CI; Confidence interval.
Logistic regression analysis for predicting the live birth rate in ICSI cycles
ICSI; Intracytoplsamic sperm injection, OR; Odds ratio and CI; Confidence interval.
Age related results according to number of embryos transferred (ET)
*NS; Not significant and SD; Standard deviation.
Discussion
Our study indicated that in good prognosis patients
aged 39 years or younger, two and three ETs
have same pregnancy and live birth rates, while the
multiple pregnancy rate was significantly higher in
ET3 group; therefore, it is recommended to transfer
two instead of three embryos.
Based on a recent guideline, individual IVF-ET
centers should evaluate their own data to identify
patient-specific, embryo-specific, and cycle-specific
to determine factors of implantation and live
birth in order to develop ET protocols minimizing
the occurrence of multi-fetal gestation, while
preserving acceptable overall pregnancy and live
birth rates ( 11 ).
In a recent study, Min et al. ( 9 ) presented a guideline
for the number of embryos transferred considering
the maternal age; however, this numbers can
be different in various infertility centers according
to the laws of those countries. In a number of
countries, including Norway, Sweden, Denmark,
Belgium, England, Italy, Germany, and Australia,
the complications associated with multiple pregnancies
are reduced through use of SET by legal
restrictions, while many other European countries
have bordered to a maximum of two ETs.
In other parts of the world like Iran, there is no
legal restriction in this regard, and it is the responsibility
of infertility specialists and patients
to make decision about the number of embryos
transferred. Various strategies for eSET depend on
different funding methods of infertility treatments.
There are countries where the public sector covers
the majority of costs, whereas in some other courtiers,
patients have to undertake the costs directly
or indirectly through private insurance systems.
Despite the recent emphasis and supports on eSET
( 3 - 6 , 12 , 13 ), this technique in not generally used
in Iran because of heavy treatment costs. SET in
our institute is necessarily for some patients with
special conditions such as poor ovarian response
and male factor cases.
In agreement with the previous studies ( 14 -
17 ), we found similar clinical pregnancy and live
birth rates in patients with two versus three ETs,
but the multiple pregnancy rate in our study was
significantly greater in group with three embryos
than two embryos transferred. Despite the fact
that women in ET3 group were younger than ET2
group, but due to higher number of couples with
male infertility in the ET3 group, the number of
patients with grade C embryos transferred were
significantly higher than ET2 group. Therefore, no
significant difference was observed between the
two groups in terms of implantation, clinical pregnancy
and live birth rates.
We evaluated the influence of maternal age on
IVF/ICSI outcome for the number of ET and the
obtained data indicated lower rate of multiple pregnancies
in group with two embryos transferred as
compared to ET3 group with individuals of different
ages (younger or older than 33 years), while
the pregnancy and live birth rates were similar. In
contrast to our results, Giannini et al. ( 18 ) showed
that in older women (≥35 years), a reduction in the
number of embryos transferred significantly decreased
the chances of pregnancy.
Logistic regression analysis showed that one
significant prognostic variable for clinical pregnancy:
maternal age (as categorical variable); it
means that in women younger than 33 years old,
the chance of clinical pregnancy increased 1.6-
fold. Our results were in line with Chuang et al.
( 19 ) that age is a good predictor for pregnancy
potential. Implantation, pregnancy and live birth
rates in women younger than 33 years old in both
groups (ET2 and ET3) were higher than older
women.
On the other hand, logistic regression analysis
indicated two significant prognostic variables for
live birth that were quality and number of transferred
embryos; it means that the chance of live
birth following ICSI treatment increased 3.2-fold
when the embryo with top quality (grade A) was
transferred. Our result is in agreement to Dennis
et al. ( 20 ) study, in which they suggested that embryo
grade is a significant predictor for live birth
rate. But the number of ET had an inverse relationship;
it means that probability of live birth in
women with transfer of two embryos was three
times greater than those who had three embryos
transferred.
One of the limitations of this study comes from
its retrospective nature; however, we tried with regression
test to control confounding factors.
Present study was performed in fresh ET cycles,
and because the probability of no synchronization between the time of fresh ET and the window of
implantation in the endometrium is existed ( 21 ),
we suggest future study to evaluate the association
between number of embryos transferred and live
birth rate in cycles with frozen and/or blastocyst
stage ETs.
According to a recent guideline, women aged
35 years or younger, in first or second IVF attempt,
with at least 2 good quality embryos
transferred should be considered as good-prognosis
patients, and the eSET strategy should
be used in order to avoid multiple pregnancies
( 9 ). In our study, the rate of twin pregnancy in
women with double ET was 27%, which is not
acceptable; therefore, it is recommended that the
eSET strategy be considered, although there are
no executive arrangements to enable our institution
to enforce the eSET strategy. Moreover it is
important to remind the patients about the high
risk nature of multiple pregnancies that requires
equipped labor which may not be available in
some rural or smaller areas. Concerns in relation
to multiple pregnancies and even twin pregnancy
resulting from ART specify the importance of
counseling before ET for IVF patients ( 22 ).
Conclusions
Due to the difficulty of implementing the eSET
strategy in some infertility centers in the world
including Iran, we suggest transferring of a maximum
of two embryos with at least one good quality
embryo for good prognosis women aged 39
years or younger. However, further clinical trials
are required to evaluate the effect of the number
of embryos transferred (single versus double ET)
for women in different age groups using fresh or
frozen ET technique.
Materials Methods
This retrospective study was performed at Reproductive
Biomedicine Research Center, Royan
Institute, Tehran, Iran, from September 2006 to
June 2010. The Institutional Review Board of
Royan Institute was approved the study. All patients
signed a consent form in their initial visit
giving permission to use their results without using
their names in the future studies. The study
population consisted of 387 women with primary
infertility and with at least one fresh ET in good
quality. Exclusion criteria were as following: use
of clomiphene citrate; use of human menopausal
gonadotropin (hMG) only in antagonist protocols;
women with advanced age (≥40), women with
body mass index (BMI) ≥30, as well as history of
ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, uterine factor
infertility, severe endometriosis, hydrosalpinges
and repeated implantation failure. All patients according
to number of ETs were categorized into
two groups: ET2 and ET3 groups, indicating two
and three embryos were transferred.
In this study, all of the patients underwent a
standard long protocol using 500 μg gonadotropinreleasing
hormone (GnRH)-a (Buserelin, Superfact,
Aventis Pharma Deutshlan, Frankfurt, Germany).
Once down-regulation was confirmed by
linear endometrium thickness in ultrasonography
and serum estradiol concentration <50 pg/ml, the
Superfact dose was reduced by one-half (250 μg),
and gonadotrophin stimulation with recombinant
follicular stimulating hormone (rFSH, Gonal-F,
Serono Laboratories Ltd., Geneva, Switzerland)
was applied and continued until the day of human
chorionic gonadotropin (hCG, IBSA, Switzerland)
administration. The first ultrasound scan was performed
on day 6 and the dose of rFSH was adjusted
according to the ovarian response. When at
least two follicles >18 mm were seen, 10000 IU
urinary hCG (uhCG, Choriomon, IBSA, Switzerland) was injected intramuscularly and oocyte
retrieval was performed 34-36 hours later. The
presence of two pronuclei and two polar bodies
was assessed 16-18 hours after ICSI. Approximately,
48 hours after injection, embryos were
classified based on morphological criteria ( 10 ).
Embryos with the best morphology and with the
most advanced stage of development were selected
for transfer. In our institute, the grading
of embryos was performed by two embryologists
with same background. Two expert clinicians
performed the ETs and the difficult ETs
were excluded from study.
In our institute, a number of factors, including
the patient’s age, cause and duration of infertility,
the number and grade of the available embryos
and requests of the couples, were taken into consideration
in order to decide how many embryos to
transfer. ET performed on day 2 or 3 after oocyte
retrieval and two or three embryos per patient were
transferred. Luteal-phase support was provided
with 400 mg vaginal progesterone (Aburaihan co.,
Tehran, Iran) twice a day until the day of beta-hCG
(β-hCG) assay. If the result of β-hCG assay was
positive, the same dosage of progesterone was
continued up to 10 weeks of gestation. Clinical
pregnancy was defined as a positive pregnancy test
followed by the presence of fetal sac on transvaginal
ultrasound 4 weeks later.
Data were analyzed using the Statistical Package
for the Social Sciences 16.0.0 (SPSS, SPSS
Inc. Chicago, IL, USA). Demographic factors,
reproductive history, ART cycle-specific parameters,
and pregnancy outcomes were compared
between two groups using the chi-square
test for categorical variables and Student t test
for continuous variables when data was normally
distributed, whereas Mann-Whitney test
was used for abnormal cases. All tests were
done two tailed. Descriptive statistics are presented
as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and
percentage. Multiple logistic regression analysis
was used to evaluate the association between
the number of ET and live birth rate, adjusting
for potential confounding variable (age). We
used Receiver Operating Curve (ROC) analysis
to find the best cut point of age for prediction
of live birth by regression equation. A value of
P<0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.