The potential value of tubal perfusion pressures measured during selective salpingography in predicting fertility
article
OA: closed
CC0
⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The value of tubal perfusion pressures assessed during selective salpingography and tubal catheterization in predicting fertility has not been investigated. METHODS: A total of 325 infertile women underwent selective salpingography and tubal catheterization. Pregnancy information was collected in 256 (78.7%). The 50th (300 mmHg) and 90th (500 mmHg) centiles of the tubal perfusion pressure distribution in women with normal tubes on selective salpingography were used as thresholds. Women were divided into three tubal perfusion pressure groups: good (both tubes <300, or one tube <300 and the other 300-500 mmHg), mediocre (both tubes 300-500, or one tube 500 mmHg) and poor (both tubes >500, or one tube > 500 and the other 300-500 mmHg). RESULTS: The pregnancy rate in the good perfusion pressure group was significantly higher than that in the poor perfusion pressure group, both when all non-IVF/ICSI first conceptions (P = 0.001) as well as when spontaneous first conceptions only were considered (P = 0.010). The pregnancy rate in the mediocre group lay between the good and the poor groups, though none of the comparisons reached statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Selective salpingography can provide additional diagnostic information in comparison with other tubal assessment tests. Tubal perfusion pressures may be predictive of future fertility.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (21)
- Comparison of hysterosalpingography and laparoscopy in predicting fertility outcome via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57591-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.174.2.2296648 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)54350-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57781-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1159/000010210 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019497 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58440-4 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(02)04704-0 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/17.9.2325 via openalex
- W2419599583 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55558-7 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57961-8 via openalex
- doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1947.tb10762.x via openalex
- doi:10.1148/radiology.177.2.2217808 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00165-x via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/17.8.2174 via openalex
- doi:10.1093/humrep/17.2.370 via openalex
- doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)57359-2 via openalex
- doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1061 via openalex
- doi:10.1097/00006254-199311000-00026 via openalex
Cited by (6)
- Potential Etiologies of Unexplained Infertility in Females 2015
- The couple with unexplained infertility 2008
- $R0APAIOANNOUISACONSULTANT/BSTETRICIANAND'YNAECOLOGISTATTHE(EARTOF%NGLAND .(3&OUNDATION4RUSTIN"IRMINGHAM5+4HETOPICFORHIS-$WASTHEUSEOFSELECTIVE SALPINGOGRAPHYANDTUBALCATHETERISATIONCOMPLETEDATTHE5NIVERSITYOF"IRMINGHAMDURING HISCLINICALFELLOWSHIPINREPRODUCTIVEMEDICINE(EHASAKEENINTERESTINTHESTUDYOFTHE &ALLOPIANTUBEANDTHETREATMENTOFTUBALDISEASE 2007
- Tubal assessment tests: still have not found what we are looking for 2007
- Unexplained infertility: Does it really exist? 2006
- Evidence-based management of tubal disease and infertility 2005
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-05-11T06:37:04.871248+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK