In vivo fertilization procedures in infertile women with patent fallopian tubes: A comparison of gamete intrafallopian transfer, combined intrauterine and intraperitoneal insemination, and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation alone

In: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics · 1992 · vol. 9(1) , pp. 19–23 · doi:10.1007/bf01204109 · PMID:1617244 · W1963597949
article OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-10

This study compared gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), combined intrauterine and intraperitoneal insemination (IUI + DIPI), and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation alone (COHS), finding IUI/DIPI and GIFT had the highest pregnancy rates.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This prospective study evaluated the relative efficacy of three in vivo assisted fertilization approaches in 150 infertile women with patent fallopian tubes: gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), combined intrauterine and direct intraperitoneal insemination (IUI + DIPI), and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation alone (COHS). Clinical pregnancy rates were highest with IUI/DIPI (29.3%) and GIFT (28.6%), compared with COHS (8.9%). The authors conclude that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation combined with IUI and DIPI may be an alternative to GIFT, with the key caveat that the abstract provides limited detail on study design balance and outcome definitions beyond pregnancy rates. This paper does not explicitly discuss endometriosis or adenomyosis; it was included in the corpus via a keyword match in the upstream search index.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the relative efficacy of three in vivo methods of assisted fertilization in 150 infertile women with patent fallopian tubes: gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), combined intrauterine and direct intraperitoneal insemination (IUI+DIPI), and controlled hyperstimulation (COHS) alone. The clinical pregnancy rate was highest in the IUI/DIPI and GIFT groups: IUI/DIPI, 29.3%; GIFT, 28.6%; and COHS, 8.9%. We believe that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation combined with IUI and DIPI is a good alternative to GIFT.
Full text 5,021 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

This prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the relative efficacy of three in vivo methods of assisted fertilization in 150 infertile women with patent fallopian tubes: gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT), combined intrauterine and direct intraperitoneal insemination (IUI + DIPI), and controlled hyperstimulation (COHS) alone. The clinical pregnancy rate was highest in the IUI/DIPI and GIFT groups: IUI/DIPI, 29.3%; GIFT, 28.6%; and COHS, 8.9%. We believe that controlled ovarian hyperstimulation combined with IUI and DIPI is a good alternative to GIFT. Similar content being viewed by others

References

Craft I, Shawaf TA, Lewis P, Serhal P, Simons E, Ah-Moye M, Fiamanya W, Robertson D, Shrivastar P, Brinsden P: Analysis of 1071 GIFT procedures—the case for a flexible approach to treatment. Lancet 1988;1:1094–1098 Henriksen T, Åbyholm T, Tanbo T, Magnus Ø: Gamete intrafallopian transfer (GIFT). The results of 95 consecutive treatments. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1989;68:197–200 DiMarzo SH, Rakoff JS: Intrauterine insemination with husband's washed sperm. Fertil Steril 1986;46:470–475 Forrler A, Dellenbach P, Nisand I, Moreau L, Cranz CL, Clavert A, Rumpler Y: Direct intraperitoneal insemination in unexplained and cervical infertility. Lancet 1986;1:916–917 Hewitt J, Cohen J, Krishnaswamy V, Fehilly CB, Steptoe PC, Walters DE: Treatment of idiopathic infertility, cervical mucus hostility, and male infertility: Artificial insemination with husband's semen or in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril 1985;44:350–355 Moghissi KS: Some reflections on intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1986;46:13–15 Sunde A, Kahn J, Molne K: Intrauterine insemination. Hum Reprod 1988;3:97–99 Studd J, Lim-Howe D, Dooley M, Savvas M: Direct intraperitoneal insemination. Lancet 1987;1:326 American Fertility Society: Revised American Fertility Society classification of endometriosis. Fertil Steril 1985;43:351–353 Åbyholm T, Tanbo T, Dale PO, Kjekshus E, Magnus Ø: The first attempt at IVF treatment. Results and requirements for a satisfactory success rate. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1990;38:125–132 Yovich JL, Blackledge DG, Richardson PA, Matson PL, Turner SR, Draper R: Pregnancies following pronuclear stage tubal transfer. Fertil Steril 1987;48:851–857 Henriksen T, Åbyholm T, Tanbo T, Magnus Ø: Pregnancies after intrafallopian transfer of embryos. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1988;5:296–298 Tanbo T, Dale PO, Åbyholm T: Assisted fertilization in infertile women with patent Fallopian tubes. A comparison of in-vitro fertilization, gamete intra-Fallopian transfer and tubal embryo stage transfer. Hum Reprod 1990;5:266–270 Welner S, DeCherney AH, Polan ML: Human menopausal gonadotropins: A justifiable therapy in ovulatory women with long-standing idiopathic infertility. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;111–117 Serhal PF, Katz M, Little V, Woronowski H: Unexplained infertility—the value of Pergonal superovulation combined with intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1988;49:602–606 Yovich JL, Matson PL: The treatment of infertility by the high intrauterine insemination of husband's washed spermatozoa. Hum Reprod 1988;3:939–943 Kaplan CR, Olive DL, Sabella V, Asch RH, Balmaceda JP, Riehl RM, Groff TR, Burns WN, Schenken RS: Gamete intrafallopian transfer vs superovulation with intrauterine insemination for the treatment of infertility. J Vitro Fert Embryo Transfer 1989;6:298–304 Sunde A, Kahn J, Molne K: Intrauterine insemination: A European collaborative report. Hum Reprod 1988;3(Suppl 2):69–73 Forrler A, Badoc E, Moreau L, Dellenbach P, Cranz CL, Clavert A, Rumpler Y: Direct intraperitoneal insemination: First results confirmed. Lancet 1986;2:1468 Hovatta O, Kurunmäki H, Tiitinen A, Lähteenmäki P, Koskimies AI: Direct intraperitoneal or intrauterine insemination and superovulation in infertility treatment: A randomized study. Fertil Steril 1990;54:339–341 Dodson WC, Whitesides DB, Hughes CL, Easley HA, Haney AF: Superovulation with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility: A possible alternative to gamete intrafallopian transfer and in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1987;48:441–445 Crosignani PG, Ragni G, Finzi GCL, Lauretis LD, Olivares MD, Perotti L: Intraperitoneal insemination in the treatment of male and unexplained infertility. Fertil Steril 1991;55:333–337 Yovich JL, Matson PL: Pregnancy rate after high intrauterine insemination of husband's spermatozoa or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Lancet 1986;2:1287 Author information Authors and Affiliations Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Åbyholm, T., Tanbo, T., Dale, P.O. et al. In vivo fertilization procedures in infertile women with patent fallopian tubes: A comparison of gamete intrafallopian transfer, combined intrauterine and intraperitoneal insemination, and controlled ovarian hyperstimulation alone. J Assist Reprod Genet 9, 19–23 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204109 Received: Accepted: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204109

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (sparse)

Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.

Cites (3)

Cited by (3)

References (27)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK