Insémination intra-utérine: pourquoi continuer à stimuler l'ovulation?

J. Belaïsch-Allart, J.-M. Mayenga, I. Grefenstette, A Chouraqui, A.M. Serkine, Filipe de Oliveira Abi‐Rached, M Plachot, O. Kulski
In: Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité · 2007 · vol. 35(9) , pp. 871–876 · doi:10.1016/j.gyobfe.2007.07.007 · PMID:17707676 · W2169862289
review OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 3 in-corpus citations
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 ⓘ

This paper examines the rationale and continued use of ovulation induction in conjunction with intrauterine insemination.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Conflicting results have been published about intra-uterine insemination efficacy. In many studies, success rates is due to ovarian stimulation and number of follicles. In the present fight against multiple pregnancies, ovarian stimulation is discussed and present pregnancy rates are weak. Our aim is to demonstrate that there is a place for the association controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intra-uterine insemination in the field of infertility treatments. It is possible to try and recognise women at high risk of multiple pregnancies, keeping the benefit of ovarian stimulation.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (23)

Cited by (3)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK