Extending the coincubation time of gametes improves in vitro fertilization.

REFERENCES Krausz C, Mills C, Rogers S, Tan SL, Aiken RJ: Stimulation of oxidant generation by human sperm suspensions using phorbol esters and formyl peptides: Relationships with motility and fertilization in vitro. Fertil Steril 1994;62:599-605 Nasr-Esfahani MH, Aitken RJ, Johnson MH: Hydrogen peroxide levels in mouse oocytes and early cleavage stage embryos developed in vitro or in vivo. Development 1990;109:501-507 Coskun S, Roca GL, Elnour AM, Mayman HAL, Hollanders JMG, Jaroudi KA: Effects of reducing insemination time in human in vitro fertilization and embryo development by using sibling oocytes. J Assist Reprod Genet 1998;15:605-608 Kochhar HPS, Buckrell BC, Pollard JW, King WA: Cleavage, sex and cell number of ovine embryos developed after different sperm-oocyte co-incubation intervals. Theriogenology 1999;51:322 Aitken RJ, Buckingham DW, West K, Brindle J: On the use of paramagnetic beads and ferrofluids to assess and eliminate the leukocytic contribution to oxygen radical generation by human sperm suspensions. Am J Reprod Immunol 1996;35:541-551 Graham MC, Phipps WR, Partridge AB, Paulhamus LA: Lack of effect of shortened sperm-oocyte exposure time on in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo quality. Fertil Steril 1999;72 (Suppl 1):S15 Hammitt DG, Barud KM, Galanits TM, Wentworth MA, Walker DL, Damario MA, Singh AP, Dumesic DA: Comparison of short and long sperm-oocyte coincubation in organ culture dishes (OCD) and tubes (TU). Fertil Steril 1999;72 (Suppl 1):S15-S16 Ferriani RA, Moraes LAM, Araujo MCPM, Sala MM: Reducing the time of sperm-oocyte interaction in human IVF. Fertil Steril 1998;70 (Suppl 1):S95 Swenson K, Summers-Chase D, Check JH, Choe J: Preliminary evidence that shortening the incubation time of sperm and oocyte may improve implantation rates with in vitro fertilization (IVF). Fertil Steril 1998;69:594-595 Gianaroli L, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Fiorentino A, Tosti E, Panzella S, Dale B: Reducing the time of sperm-oocyte interaction in human in-vitro fertilization improves the implantation rate. Hum Reprod 1996;11:166-171 Gianaroli L, Fiorentino A, Magli MC, Ferraretti AP, Montanaro N: Prolonged sperm-oocyte exposure and high sperm concentration affect human embryo viability and pregnancy rate. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2507-2511 Free DA, Merryman DC, Stringfellow SE, Long CA, Houserman VL, Honea KL, Meintjes M: Limited oocytesperm co-incubation time does not improve embryo quality, implantation or pregnancy rates in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1998;70 (Suppl 1):S98-S99 Swenson K, Check JH, Summers-Chase D, Choe JK, Nazari A: Arandomized study comparing the effect of standard versus short incubation of sperm and oocyte on subsequent pregnancy and implantation rates following in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET). Fertil Steril 1999;72 (Suppl 1):16S-17S Johnson JE, Boone WR, Blackhurst DW: Manual versus computer-automated semen analyses. Part I. Comparison of counting chambers. Fertil Steril 1996;65:150-155 Boone WR, Johnson JE, Price TM, Bowers BK, Morris MD, Crane MM, Bates GW: In vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) comes to the upstate. J SC Med Assoc 1994;90:360-366 May JV, Hanshew K: Organization of the in vitro fertilization/embryo transfer laboratory. In Handbook of the Laboratory Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility, BA Keel, BW Webster (eds). Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, 1990, pp 291-329 Kochhar HPS, King WA: Timing of sperm oocyte interaction and its effect on cleavage and development rate in a bovine IVF system. Theriogenology 1998;49:288 Rehman N, Collins AR, Suh TK, Wright RW Jr: Effect of sperm exposure time on in vitro fertilization and embryo development of bovine oocytes matured in vitro. Theriogenology 1994;41:1447-1452 Author information Authors and Affiliations Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Boone, W.R., Johnson, J.E. Clinical Assisted Reproduction: Extending the Coincubation Time of Gametes Improves In Vitro Fertilization. J Assist Reprod Genet 18, 18–20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026442411577 Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026442411577