Fluorescence-guided ureteral identification in robotic surgery for advanced endometriosis: a comparison of junior versus senior surgeons

Linda A Alpuing Radilla, Linda Alpuing Radilla, Qiannan Yang, Daniel Y Lovell, Tamisa Koythong, Brooke Thigpen, Luis E Delgadillo Chabolla, Qianqing Wang, Xiaoming Guan
Scientific reports · 2025 · vol. 15(1) , pp. 19933 · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-05082-1 · PMID:40481106 · W4411100888
article OA: gold CC0 ⤵ 1 in-corpus citation
📄 Open PDF View on OpenAlex View on PubMed View at publisher

Abstract

Identifying the ureters in patients with advanced endometriosis and severe pelvic adhesive disease can be challenging. Adhesiolysis along the deformed pelvic sidewall may increase the risk of prolonged operative time and incidental ureteral injury. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and surgical outcomes of using Indocyanine Green (ICG) under near-infrared fluorescence for intraoperative ureteral localization and preservation during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery (RALS) for advanced endometriosis, comparing procedures performed by two junior surgeons to those performed by one senior surgeon. This was a retrospective observational case series conducted by three minimally invasive gynecologic surgeons (X.G., T.K., B.T.) at a single tertiary care center between August 2021 and January 2025. A total of 92 patients underwent RALS using ICG fluorescence; 44 surgeries were performed by two junior surgeons, and 48 by a senior surgeon. The senior group had a higher percentage of patients with complete cul-de-sac obliteration (56.3% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.001). Our primary surgical outcome, total operative time, was 233 min in the junior group and 348 min in the senior group, initially showing a significant difference. However, after adjusting for factors such as history of prior abdominal surgery, cul-de-sac obliteration, and additional procedures (resection of ovarian remnant, bowel shaving, oophorectomy, enterolysis) using multivariable linear regression analysis, no significant difference was observed between the two groups. Other perioperative outcomes-including patient characteristics, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, and postoperative pain at weeks 1, 2, and 3-were comparable between the groups. Complication rates did not differ significantly. Notably, there were no cases of temporary or permanent ureteral injury in either group. These findings suggest that with ICG-assisted ureteral mapping, junior surgeons can achieve comparable surgical outcomes to senior surgeons. ICG facilitates intraoperative ureter identification, with the potential to enhance surgical safety by improving surgical precision and supporting the training of junior surgeons in managing complex endometriosis.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Outcome instruments

rASRM

Condition tags

mesh:D004715endometriosis

MeSH descriptors

Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Endometriosis Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures Robotic Surgical Procedures

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (31)

Cited by (1)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T16:23:13.998983+00:00
pmc
last seen: 2026-05-13T20:22:03.195721+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-17T00:31:17.195017+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK