Endometriosis classification: an update
Review
OA: closed
public-domain-us
⚙
AI-generated summary
by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-08-25
ⓘ
This review examines endometriosis classification systems, highlighting that while the revised American Fertility Society and ENZIAN systems exist, only the Endometriosis Fertility Index is validated to predict pregnancy outcomes in infertility patients.
⚙
AI-generated deep summary
by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-09
· read from full text
ⓘ
This review article examines the limitations of existing staging systems for endometriosis, noting that the disease remains difficult to classify in a way that facilitates prognosis and treatment. It highlights the historical dominance of the revised American Fertility Society system while discussing newer tools like the ENZIAN classification and the Endometriosis Fertility Index, which predicts pregnancy rates after surgery. The paper also mentions ongoing efforts by the AAGL to develop pain-focused categorization systems and suggests that novel research in imaging and genomics may inform future classifications. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically the evolution and utility of classification systems for the condition.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Endometriosis remains an enigmatic disease for many reasons, not the least being a continued inability to stage its clinical presentation so that prognosis and treatment for both pain and infertility patients can be facilitated. This article reviews issues with current staging systems.
RECENT FINDINGS: The revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) classification system has historically been the only classification system. Recently, the ENZIAN classification system, developed as an adjunct to the rAFS to describe more severe disease, has been introduced but is rarely used. More recently, the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) that has been validated to predict pregnancy rates in infertility patients following surgical diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis was published. Currently, the AAGL is developing a categorization system that will be more focused on pain. Novel research in imaging, biomarkers, histology, and the human genome may provide useful information to develop future classification systems.
SUMMARY: The only validated endometriosis classification system that predicts a clinical outcome is the EFI. It is to be hoped that renewed interest in the importance and utility of classification systems will result in novel classification systems that are clinically useful.
Full text
1,371 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Endometriosis classification
an update
- G. David Adamson
Purpose of review
Endometriosis remains an enigmatic disease for many reasons, not the least being a continued inability to stage its clinical presentation so that prognosis and treatment for both pain and infertility patients can be facilitated. This article reviews issues with current staging systems.
Recent findings
The revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) classification system has historically been the only classification system. Recently, the ENZIAN classification system, developed as an adjunct to the rAFS to describe more severe disease, has been introduced but is rarely used. More recently, the Endometriosis Fertility Index (EFI) that has been validated to predict pregnancy rates in infertility patients following surgical diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis was published. Currently, the AAGL is developing a categorization system that will be more focused on pain. Novel research in imaging, biomarkers, histology, and the human genome may provide useful information to develop future classification systems.
Summary
The only validated endometriosis classification system that predicts a clinical outcome is the EFI. It is to be hoped that renewed interest in the importance and utility of classification systems will result in novel classification systems that are clinically useful.
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below.
Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure
cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can
have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy
(via DOI)
is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
⚙
Ask this paper
AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text
· source: oa-doi-fallback
ⓘ
Outcome instruments
Enzian
Condition tags
endometriosischronic_pelvic_paininfertility
MeSH descriptors
Endometriosis
Endometriosis
Endometriosis
Endometriosis
Endometriosis
Female
Female
Humans
Humans
Infertility, Female
Infertility, Female
Infertility, Female
Pelvic Pain
Pelvic Pain
Pelvic Pain
Prognosis
Prognosis
Citation neighborhood
(no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet.
The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to
``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI
matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation
reconcile pass to retry.
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-10-15T06:08:49.021275+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-10-08T21:09:02.791371+00:00
- unpaywall
- last seen: 2026-10-15T06:24:24.424788+00:00
License: public-domain-us
· commercial use OK
· attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine