Usefulness of double-puncture laparoscopy in the infertility work-up.

International journal of fertility · 1987 · vol. 32(1) , pp. 38–40 · PMID:2880813 · W38703777
article OA: closed CC0
View on OpenAlex View on PubMed
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-13

Double-puncture laparoscopy should be employed early in infertility work-ups when pelvic pathology is suspected or later when other tests are normal and only peritoneal involvement is possible, as the single-puncture technique limits pathology assessment.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

This retrospective study confirms that laparoscopy should be performed early in the infertility investigation when pelvic pathology is suspected. If performed, the procedure should be via the double-puncture technique. Otherwise, it should be done when the rest of the tests have proven to be within normal limits and there is only the possibility of peritoneal involvement (i.e., pelvic adhesions or pelvic endometriosis). Our impression is that the single-puncture technique seriously compromises the physician's ability to assess pelvic pathology adequately.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

endometriosisinfertility

MeSH descriptors

Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Endometrium Endometrium Fallopian Tubes Fallopian Tubes Female Humans Infertility, Female Laparoscopy Retrospective Studies

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-06-19T06:14:56.452680+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-05-13T22:09:35.489789+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK