Appendiceal endometrioma mimicking appendiceal neoplasm

case-report OA: gold CC0
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15

This case describes an appendiceal endometrioma presenting as an appendiceal mass, mimicking a neoplasm and ultimately requiring a right hemicolectomy.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-07, 2026-07-15 · read from full text

This paper describes a single 40-year-old woman with known endometriosis whose preoperative workup for constipation and altered bowel habits revealed a colonoscopic “fish mouth” mass protruding at the appendiceal orifice, suspicious for appendiceal mucinous neoplasm. Despite colonoscopic biopsy showing a sessile serrated lesion and CT/MRI failing to definitively visualize the appendix or mucin, the patient underwent planned laparoscopic cecectomy that progressed to right hemicolectomy after intraoperative concern for malignancy and inability to obtain appropriate margins. Histopathology of the resected specimen showed multiple foci of endometriosis in the appendix (with 33 lymph nodes negative) and no neoplasia. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it reports an appendiceal endometrioma mimicking an appendiceal neoplasm on endoscopy and imaging.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

Endometriosis of the vermiform appendix is an uncommon pathology that may present as an appendiceal mass identified on colonoscopy. This may be due to an appendiceal endometrioma or intussusception of the appendix. Mucinous appendiceal neoplasms and neuroendocrine tumors are important clinical differentials. When there is concern for possible malignancy, resection is recommended, usually as a stapled cecectomy. In this case we describe an appendiceal endometrioma presenting as an appendiceal mass, requiring a right hemicolectomy.
Full text 5,455 characters · extracted from pmc-nxml · 3 sections · click to expand

Case

A 40-year-old female was referred to a colorectal surgeon for workup of altered bowel habits in the setting of endometriosis. She described increasing constipation and hard stools over several months. She denied per-rectal bleeding or loss of weight. There were no abnormalities on abdominal or rectal examination. She had previously undergone diagnostic laparoscopy for endometriosis, which had revealed pelvic adhesions. No tethering of the right colon or appendix was noted at the time. The patient was being considered for hysterectomy to treat chronic pelvic pain and dysmenorrhea secondary to endometriosis. She was taking hormone replacement therapy for endometrial suppression. As part of pre-operative workup, a colonoscopy was performed, revealing an abnormal appendiceal orifice with an intraluminal protruding “fish mouth” mass suspicious for an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm ( Fig. 1 ). Of note, there was no mucin identified. A cold snare biopsy was taken of a polyp overlying the mass, with histological examination demonstrating a sessile serrated lesion. Subsequent CT and MRI of the abdomen did not definitively identify the appendix. No caecal abnormality for free fluid was demonstrated. Colonoscopic image of protruding, intraluminal, “fish mouth” appearing mass at the appendiceal orifice. To obtain a tissue diagnosis and exclude an appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, the patient was planned for laparoscopic cecectomy. Intraoperative findings included pelvic adhesions ( Fig. 2 ), a short appendix and a firm caecal base suspicious for malignancy ( Fig. 3 ). A partial cecectomy was unable to be performed with appropriate margins, and right hemicolectomy was performed instead with side-to-side stapled ileocolic anastomosis. The patient’s recovery was uncomplicated, and she was discharged day 4 postoperatively. Intraoperative image of pelvic adhesions secondary to endometriosis. No mucin was seen. Intraoperative image of thickened caecum without any obvious mass on the serosal surface of colon and shortened appendix. Macroscopic examination of the resected caecum showed a small appendiceal stump with an intraluminal nodule at the appendiceal orifice ( Fig. 4 ). Transection of the appendiceal remnant showed a firm, white structure. Microscopic examination revealed multiple foci of endometriosis within the muscularis mucosae, muscularis propria ( Fig. 5 ), submucosa, and mesentery of the appendix. There was no neoplasia identified in the appendix or 33 lymph nodes. Transected ileocolic resection specimen with intraluminal view, arrow indicating appendiceal nodule. Low and high-power microscopic views of the appendix showing foci of endometriosis within the muscularis propria.

Discussion

Fish mouth appearance of appendiceal orifice is highly suggestive of mucinous appendiceal neoplasm. However, when mucin is absent, other differentials should be considered. Differentials for an appendiceal mass include endometriosis, malignancy, and appendiceal intussusception. Endometriosis may exist concurrently with an appendiceal neoplasm [ 8 ], or an appendix that macroscopically appears consistent with endometriosis may represent malignancy [ 9 ]. Therefore, surgical resection is the recommended treatment for an appendiceal mass. In the case of appendiceal intussusception, the appendix may be absent at the convergence of the taenia coli and instead present as a mass at the caecal base. Reduction of the appendiceal intussusception to facilitate appendicectomy has been described, but more commonly, stapled cecectomy is required. As described in this case, if there is concern for malignancy and a stapled cecectomy cannot be performed with appropriate margins, a right hemicolectomy may be required [ 5 ]. Appendiceal intussusception is an uncommon pathology that may present as an appendiceal mass found on colonoscopy. It is most frequently caused by endometriosis in adult females; however, surgical resection may be required to exclude neoplastic differentials such as appendiceal mucinous neoplasms and neuroendocrine tumors.

Introduction

The appendix is an uncommon location for endometriosis, usually at the tip of appendix identified during diagnostic laparoscopy. Endometriosis of the appendix may present clinically as appendicitis [ 1 ] or be found incidentally during surgery for endometriosis, occurring in 7.23% of cases. An Australian study identified endometriosis in 0.61% of 2284 female appendicectomy specimens, of which 39.5% had concurrent appendicitis, and 14.3% had a concurrent mucinous neoplasm [ 2 ]. A rare presentation of appendiceal endometriosis is as a mass at the appendiceal orifice. Differentials for an appendiceal mass include fecaliths, parasites, foreign bodies, polyps, malignancy, and, in our case, endometriosis [ 3 ]. Endometriosis of the appendix may develop a mass-forming endometrioma [ 4 ] or act as a lead point for intussusception of the appendix [ 5 ]. Endometriosis is the most common (33%) cause of appendiceal intussusception in adults [ 6 ], and has been described to present clinically as a mimic for appendicitis [ 3 ], or as a mass at the appendiceal orifice identified during endoscopy [ 5 , 7 ]. In both cases, imaging is often inconclusive, and intra-operatively, the appendix may not be identifiable at the convergence of the taenia coli. In this case, we describe a case of an appendiceal endometrioma mimicking an appendiceal neoplasm as a mass at the appendiceal orifice.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: pmc-nxml

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosisendometrioma

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (9)

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-07-31T06:09:14.520117+00:00
openalex
last seen: 2026-06-04T00:00:01.174412+00:00
pmc
last seen: 2026-05-13T20:22:03.195721+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-07-31T06:04:41.494525+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK