Correction: Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
erratum
OA: gold
CC0
⤵ 6 in-corpus citations
Abstract
In the Results section of the Abstract, there is an error in the second sentence. The correct sentence is: The pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, and LR-values of MRI for RE were 88% (95% CI, 85-91%), 90% (95% CI, 88-92%), 17.26 (95% CI, 3.57-83.50), and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.10-0.23); values of TVS were 90% [95% CI, 87-92%], 96% (95% CI, 94-97%), 20.66 (95% CI, 8.71-49.00) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.08-0.20), respectively.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood
Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.
References (1)
- W2936493390 via openalex
Cited by (6)
- The Diagnostic Performance of Transvaginal Ultrasound for Posterior Compartment Endometriosis Compared to Laparoscopic and Histopathological Findings: A Systematic Review 2025
- Transvaginal sonography and surgical findings in the diagnosis of endometriosis individuals: A cross-sectional study 2023
- Three Types of Endometriosis: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment. State of the Art 2023
- Current Updates on the Role of Microbiome in Endometriosis: A Narrative Review 2023
- Pelvic Pain: Role of Imaging in the Diagnosis and Management 2021
- Rectal endometriosis: predictive MRI signs for segmental bowel resection 2020
Source provenance
- europepmc
- last seen: 2026-06-04T01:30:01.192114+00:00
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
- pubmed
- last seen: 2026-05-13T22:22:35.348889+00:00
License: CC0
· commercial use OK