Corrected Cloacal Anomaly: Obstetric Challenge-A Rare Case Report

Case report OA: closed
⚙ AI-generated summary by qwen3.7-flash+body, 2026-09-26 ⓘ

A woman with corrected cloacal anomaly and uterus didelphys conceived spontaneously despite coital difficulties, requiring emergency cesarean section complicated by bladder injury.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by qwen3.7-flash, 2026-09-26 · read from full text ⓘ

This case report describes a 26-year-old primigravida with a history of corrected cloacal anomaly who conceived spontaneously despite coital difficulties and presented at term with a breech fetus. Due to distorted pelvic anatomy and prior surgeries, the patient underwent an emergency cesarean section which was complicated by an inadvertent bladder injury requiring repair. The authors highlight that while neonatal reconstruction aims to separate channels, residual anatomical distortions can lead to significant obstetric challenges, including difficult deliveries and increased risk of surgical complications. Relevance to endometriosis: mentioned in the discussion as a potential consequence of associated uterine anomalies such as hematometra, though the paper's main focus is on obstetric management of cloacal defects.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 6,775 characters · extracted from oa-html · 4 sections · click to expand

Introduction

Cloacal anomalies are a type of anorectal malformation in which the rectum, urethra and vagina fail to separate. It is an extremely rare disorder, incidence being 1 in 50,000 births [1]. It usually affects girl child. There may be only a single opening in the perineum. There may be co-existent anomalies of GIT, cardiac, renal, uterine, skeletal and limbs. Great surgical expertise is required to correct both anorectal and urogenital malformations in the childhood with significant bearing on the reproductive outcome in later life. Case Report Mrs X, 26-year-old primigravida, a booked case in our institution with last menstrual period on 19 April 2016 and expected date of delivery on 26 January 2017, was admitted at 36 weeks for safe confinement. She was married for 2 years and had coital difficulty but had conceived spontaneously. Her antenatal history was uneventful. Past history revealed a corrective surgery in the newborn period for anorectal malformation. She was born with a single opening in the perineum, and a colostomy was done on the 1st day of life. Subsequently, a definitive surgery was done at 9 months of age followed by closure of colostomy at 18 months. She developed stricture at the anal opening for which an anoplasty was done at 5 years of age. She was having regular bowel and bladder habits. On general examination, she had rocker bottom foot (Fig. 1). Her vitals were stable, and her systemic examination was within normal limits. Her obstetric examination revealed a single intrauterine gestation in breech presentation with adequate growth and normal liquor and fetal heart sounds. Examination of external genitalia revealed normal labia majora and labia minora fused in the midline; there was a dimple in the midline at the region of introitus which admitted tip of little finger (Fig. 2). Urethra was not visualised, and the anal opening was scarred. Investigations: a pelvic ultrasound taken at 19 years of age revealed uterus didelphys, ovaries, adenaxae normal and both kidneys and ureters were normal. Her 1st trimester antenatal UGS was showing disparity in dates of 2 weeks, and her last USG at 37 weeks showed abnormal lie (breech presentation) in the last trimester. Urology consultation was done as urethral opening was not seen. They performed a cystoscopy, and urethra was identified through the vaginal dimple and bladder catheterised under cystoscopic guidance (Fig. 3) Obstetric management was a planned elective caesarean at 39 weeks due to mistaken dates in I trimester ultrasound, but patient went into labour at 38.2 weeks, and an emergency caesarean section was performed on 15th January at 8 am. Operative findings and procedure: Subumbilical midline incision was planned due to previous scar on the abdomen, and difficult abdominal entry was anticipated, and as expected, there was difficulty in entering the peritoneal cavity, inadvertent bladder injury of about 5-cm anterior bladder wall (Fig. 4). Lower segment caesarean section performed and delivered a male baby 2700 gm as breech, Apgar 1’9. Uterus was didelphys (Fig. 5) with pregnancy in the right horn; bilateral tubes and ovaries were normal. Bladder rent repaired by urologist whose assistance was sought initially anticipating complications; suprapubic catheter (SPC) and intra-peritoneal drain were kept. Urethral catheter was removed after 2 weeks and SPC after 3 weeks with normal voiding. Otherwise, post-operative period was uneventful.

Discussion

Cloacal anomaly is a complex problem, best dealt at a specialist centre and needs a team work [2]. The aim of definitive reconstruction is to create three separate channels. Although corrected in neonatal life, if not followed up, it can pose challenges during obstetric carrier. Due to stricture formation in created openings, there can be cryptomenorrhoea, difficult coitus or difficulty in defecation [3]. Due to associated uterine anomalies, there are chances of development of hematometra, endometriosis, early miscarriage, preterm labour, malpresentation and rupture uterus [4]. The mode of delivery in such cases would be by caesarean section with high chance of bowel and bladder injuries due to altered pelvic anatomy. A study by Hendren et al. [5] of 195 women with corrected cloacal anomalies reached adulthood, 17 experienced coital difficulties and 7 delivered by caesarean section except one who had vaginal birth.

Conclusions

Our case is unique as patient conceived in spite of coital difficulties and reached term gestation without any complications. Due to distorted anatomy, patient needed catheterisation under cystoscopic guidance and had a per-operative bladder injury which was repaired and healed without any sequelae. Dr. Jyoti Ramesh Chandran is an aluminus of Government Medical College Jabalpur. She is the president of Calicut O&G Society 2018, 2019 and 2020. She is the corresponding editor of JOGI (2017–2020). She is also member of Institutional Research Committee of GMC Kozhikode. Her areas of interest include high-risk obstetrics, endoscopy and fetal medicine. Compliance with Ethical Standards Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Consent for Publication Written consent has been obtained for reporting the case, and care has been taken not to divulge any identifying information. Footnotes Dr. Jyoti Ramesh Chandran is an Additional Professor of the Department of OBG, Government Medical College Kozhikode, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. Dr. S. Lakshmy is an Associate Professor of the Department of OBG, Government Medical College Kozhikode, Kozhikode, Kerala, India. Publisher's Note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

- 1.Desai J, Mehta A, Patel P, et al. A critical case report-cloacal malformation: prenatal diagnosis and autopsy findings. Austin J Surg. 2019;6(2):1162. [Google Scholar] - 2.Rink RC, Kaefer M. Surgical management of sexual differentiation, cloacal malformations and other abnormalities in the genitalia of girls. Advances in Experimental medicine and biology. What urologists should know about pediatric gynecologic abnormalities. Contemp Urol 2002;14:12. - 3.New MI, Simpson JL. Hormonal and genetic basis of Sexual differentiation disorders and hot topics in endocrinology. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World conference. 2011, Vol 707. ISBN : 978-1-4419-8001-4 - 4.Levitt MA. Bichoff Pena-Pitfall and challenges of Cloacal repair. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2010;19(2):128–138. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2009.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] - 5.Hendren WH et al. The most severe degree of imperforate anus repair experience in 195 cases. In: Ashcraft’s paediatric surgery, 7th ed. May 2019.

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

⚙ Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-html ⓘ

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. The paper's references may be in our DB but unresolved to ``paper_id`` (resolution happens at ingest when the cited DOI matches a row we already have). Run the cross-source citation reconcile pass to retry.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-10-18T09:30:06.152893+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-10-08T21:30:40.998460+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-10-20T06:27:24.728081+00:00