Die operative Laparoskopie auf europäischer und internationaler Ebene

K. J. Neis
In: Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics · 1993 · vol. 254(1-4) , pp. 351–354 · doi:10.1007/bf02266022 · W4245968459
article OA: closed CC0
Limited metadata. Only one source feed has indexed this record so far — no abstract, full text, or open-access copy is available through Endo Lab. The publisher's page (linked below) is the canonical location for the actual content. If you have institutional access, use "Find at my library".
View at publisher → View on OpenAlex
⚙ AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08 ⓘ

Operative laparoscopy is gaining international acceptance, necessitating a balanced discussion of its indications and limitations compared to laparotomy, especially in oncology, prioritizing patient interests over surgical ambition.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

⚙ AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-10 ⓘ

The paper discusses the international uptake of operative laparoscopy in gynecology, arguing that with appropriate training and operator practice, technical limits may be less decisive and the field could shift substantially from abdominal procedures toward laparoscopic approaches. It emphasizes the need for balanced, non-ideological discussion and explicitly calls out both uncritical rejection of techniques one cannot perform and uncritical adoption of anything technically feasible, stressing case-by-case assessment of whether laparoscopy treats patients as well as laparotomy and whether laparotomy is justified for the specific finding. A limitation noted implicitly is that the argument is largely conceptual rather than based on a specific study population or comparative trial results. Relevance to endometriosis: the paper does not explicitly focus on endometriosis, but it is included in the corpus alongside cited endometriosis-related operative laparoscopy literature and broader discussions of gynecologic endoscopic surgery, making it thematically relevant even though its main focus is operative laparoscopy adoption and indication-setting.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Condition tags

die_deep_infiltrating

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (13)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK