Anatomical Landmarks in Deep Endometriosis Surgery

In: Minimally Invasive Gynecology · 2018 · pp. 45–59 · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72592-5_5 · W2800157561
book-chapter OA: closed CC0 ⤵ 5 in-corpus citations
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-08

Surgical treatment of deep endometriosis requires extensive anatomical knowledge to restore normal pelvic relationships and preserve neural structures in distorted surgical fields.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-09 · read from full text

This chapter discusses deep endometriosis (DE) as a progressive infiltrative inflammatory disease that distorts pelvic anatomy and argues that surgical management aims to restore normal pelvic anatomical relationships. Drawing on pelvic surgical anatomy, it describes anatomical landmarks used to reassess a distorted field and to guide steps such as mobilization of pelvic viscera, wide peritoneal resections, and identification of parasympathetic and orthosympathetic pelvic neural fibers in nerve-sparing procedures. The text is primarily educational and does not present new experimental data, with the main limitation being its reliance on established anatomical knowledge and prior literature rather than original outcome results. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on anatomical landmarks and surgical anatomy considerations for deep endometriosis surgery.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 6,199 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Deep endometriosis (DE) represents a chronic inflammatory disease, affecting pelvic viscera and peritoneal and retroperitoneal structures and completely distorting their normal aspect and reciprocal relationships by a mechanism of progressive infiltration and retraction. One of the main objectives of its surgical treatment, together with reducing pelvic pain and improving fertility, is the restoration of normal pelvic anatomy. For this reason, surgeons must have a deep knowledge of pelvic anatomy, in order to reassess a grossly distorted surgical field. Thus, pelvic anatomical landmarks represent essential points of reference to start procedures such as mobilization of the pelvic viscera, wide peritoneal resections, or the identification of further anatomical structures to be preserved, such as parasympathetic and orthosympathetic pelvic neural fibers in nerve-sparing procedures. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Testut L. Traitè d’Anatomie Humaine. 8th ed. Paris: Ed Doin; 1931. Kamina P. Anatomie Clinique. Tome 4. Paris, Ed Maloine SA, 2008. Ceccaroni M, Fanfani F, Ercoli A, Scambia G. Innervazione Viscerale e Somatica della Pelvi Femminile. Testo Atlante di Anatomia Chirurgica 2006. Edizioni CIC. Ballester M, Belghiti J, Zilberman S, Thomin A, Bonneau C, Bazot M, Thomassin-Naggara I, Daraï E. Surgical and clinical impact of extraserosal pelvic fascia removal in segmental colorectal resection for endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(6):1041–8. Netter FH. Atlante di Anatomia Fisiopatologia e Clinica, Vol. 3. Apparato Riproduttivo, Collezione CIBA, 1999. De Kleuver M, Kooijman MA, Kauer JM, et al. Pelvic osteotomies: anatomic pitfalls at the ischium. A cadaver study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998;117(6–7):376–8. Traité d’anatomie humaine. Publié sous la direction de P. Poirier et A. Charpy, 1899. Peham HV, Amreich J. Gynakologische operationslehre. Berlin: S Karger; 1930. Peham HV, Amreich J. Operative gynecology (translated by Ferguson LK). Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1934. Querleu D, Morrow CP. Classification of radical hysterectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9(3):297–303. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Bruni F, D'Urso E, Gagliardi ML, Roviglione G, Minelli L, Ruffo G. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(7):2029–45. Ceccaroni M, Pontrelli G, Spagnolo E, Scioscia M, Bruni F, Paglia A, Minelli L. Parametrial dissection during laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a new approach aims to improve patients' postoperative quality of life. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;202(3):320. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G, Ruffo G.Neuro-anatomy of the posterior parametrium and surgical considerations for a nerve-sparing approach in radical pelvic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:4386–94. Ercoli A, Delmas V, Fanfani F, et al. Terminologia Anatomica versus unofficial descriptions and nomenclature of the fasciae and ligaments of the female pelvis: a dissection-based comparative study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:1565–73. Heald RJ. The “holy plane” of rectal surgery. J R Soc Med. 1988;81:503–8. Havenga YY, Sasaki H, Hatakeyama N, Murakami G. Discrepancies between classic anatomy and modern gynecologic surgery on pelvic connective tissue structure: harmonization of those concepts by collaborative cadaver dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193(1):7–15. Yohannes P. Ureteral endometriosis. J Urol. 2003;170:20–5. Antonelli A, Simeone C, Zani D, Sacconi T, Minini G, Canossi E, et al. Clinical aspects and surgical treatment of urinary tract endometriosis: our experience with 31 cases. Eur Urol. 2006;49:1093–7. Ostrzenski A, Radolinski B, Ostrzenska KM. A review of laparoscopic ureteral injury in pelvic surgery. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003;58:794–9. Terzibachian JJ, Gay C, Bertrand V, Bouvard M, Knoepffler F. Value of ureteral catheterization in laparoscopy. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2001;29:427–32. Grainger DA, Soderstrom RM, Schiff SF, Glickman MG, DeCherney AH, Diamond MP. Ureteral injuries at laparoscopy: insights into diagnosis, management and prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:889–90. Rafique M, Arif MH. Management of iatrogenic ureteric injuries associated with gynecological surgery. Int Urol Nephrol. 2002;34:31–5. Yabuki Y, Sasaki H, Hatakeyama N, Murakami G. Discrepancies between classic anatomy and modern gynecologic surgery on pelvic connective tissue structure: harmonization of those concepts by collaborative cadaver dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:7–15. Ceccaroni M, Pontrelli G, Spagnolo E, et al. Nerve-Sparing laparoscopic radical excision of deep endometriosis with rectal and parametrial resection. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:14–5. Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD. Br J Surg. 1982;69(10):613–6. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Roviglione G, et al. Deep rectal and parametrial infiltrating endometriosis with monolateral pudendal nerve involvement: case report and laparoscopic nerve-sparing approach. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010;153:227–9. Ercoli A, Delmas V, Gadonneix P, Fanfani F, Villet R, Paparella P, Mancuso S, Scambia G. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the risk of injury to the autonomous pelvic nerves. Surg Radiol Anat. 2003;25(3–4):200–6. Author information Authors and Affiliations Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature About this chapter Cite this chapter Ceccaroni, M., Roviglione, G., Mautone, D., Clarizia, R. (2018). Anatomical Landmarks in Deep Endometriosis Surgery. In: Gomes-da-Silveira, G.G., da Silveira, G.P.G., Pessini, S.A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Gynecology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72592-5_5 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72592-5_5 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-319-72591-8 Online ISBN: 978-3-319-72592-5 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

endometriosis

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (21)

Cited by (5)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK