Posterocentral Compartment (Rectum)

In: Imaging of Endometriosis: A Comparative Guide of US, MRI and Surgery · 2025 · pp. 159–186 · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_9 · W4410875643
book-chapter OA: closed CC0
Full text JSON View on OpenAlex View at publisher
AI-generated summary by claude@2026-06+body, 2026-06-28

This review outlines imaging strategies, particularly MRI, for assessing rectal endometriosis, emphasizing lesion location, depth, and extent to guide surgical planning and management.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-07 · read from full text

This chapter addresses how to image and assess rectal endometriosis, focusing on radiology workflows for detection and detailed mapping of rectal involvement. It synthesizes existing evidence and expert guidance on imaging methods (transvaginal ultrasonography as first-line for initial diagnosis and MRI as the preferred comprehensive modality), outlining key lesion descriptors such as location, distance from the anal verge, size, depth, circumferential extent, lesion count, and associated deep endometriotic lesions to support surgical planning and informed consent. A caveat is that imaging interpretation and selection of operative technique depend on accurate assessment of these features, and the chapter discusses multidisciplinary risk–benefit balancing rather than reporting new comparative outcomes. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — specifically rectal endometriosis within a compartment-based imaging framework for predicting extent and surgical involvement.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Full text 22,552 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · 2 sections · click to expand

Abstract

Rectal endometriosis represents one of the most severe forms of deep endometriosis. Radiologists are tasked with optimizing imaging to ensure accurate detection and then providing a detailed assessment of the extent of rectal involvement. Transvaginal ultrasonography is currently considered the first-line technique for initial diagnosis. MRI is recognized as the best imaging modality, offering a comprehensive roadmap, especially in surgical decision-making. Managing rectal endometriosis is complex, and multidisciplinary team discussion evaluating the risk–benefit balance of options provides the optimal personalized treatment, such as hormonal therapies or surgical approaches. When surgery is indicated, the success of surgical intervention and the choice of surgical technique—such as partial or complete discoid resection or segmental resection—depend on the accurate interpretation of imaging findings. This allows for informed patient consent and facilitates planning for colorectal involvement when needed. Critical key imaging factors include the exact location of the lesion; the lesion’s distance from the anal verge; the size, depth, and circumferential extent of rectal involvement; any associated deep endometriotic lesions; and the lesion count. Access this chapter Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout Purchases are for personal use only Similar content being viewed by others

References

Rousset P, Florin M, Bharwani N, Touboul C, Monroc M, Golfier F, et al. Deep pelvic infiltrating endometriosis: MRI consensus lexicon and compartment-based approach from the ENDOVALIRM group. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2023;104(3):95–112. Chapron C, Fauconnier A, Vieira M, Barakat H, Dousset B, Pansini V, et al. Anatomical distribution of deeply infiltrating endometriosis: surgical implications and proposition for a classification. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(1):157–61. Hajati A, Hajati O. A review of more than 2000 cases of site-specific pelvic endometriosis rates by MRI: a guide to minimizing under/overdiagnosis non-invasively. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):129. Remorgida V, Ferrero S, Fulcheri E, Ragni N, Martin DC. Bowel endometriosis: presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2007;62(7):461–70. Rzewuska N, Kunicki M, Mechsner S, Kordowitzki P. Rare clinical presentation of postmenopausal endometriosis: a new perspective. Aging Dis. 2023;15:2361. Kavallaris A, Köhler C, Kühne-Heid R, Schneider A. Histopathological extent of rectal invasion by rectovaginal endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(6):1323–7. Anaf V, El Nakadi I, Simon P, Van de Stadt J, Fayt I, Simonart T, et al. Preferential infiltration of large bowel endometriosis along the nerves of the colon. Hum Reprod. 2004;19(4):996–1002. Redwine DB, Wright JT. Laparoscopic treatment of complete obliteration of the cul-de-sac associated with endometriosis: long-term follow-up of en bloc resection. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(2):358–65. Possover M, Diebolder H, Plaul K, Schneider A. Laparascopically assisted vaginal resection of rectovaginal endometriosis. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96(2):304–7. Gandek B, Ware JE, Aaronson NK, Apolone G, Bjorner JB, Brazier JE, et al. Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 health survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA project. International quality of life assessment. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51(11):1171–8. Cardaillac C, Levesque A, Riant T, Mortier A, Neunlist M, Perrouin-Verbe MA, et al. Evaluation of a scoring system for the detection of central sensitization among women with chronic pelvic pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023;229(5):530.e1–530.e17. Collinet P, Fritel X, Revel-Delhom C, Ballester M, Bolze PA, Borghese B, et al. Management of endometriosis: CNGOF/HAS clinical practice guidelines—short version. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2018;47(7):265–74. Haas D, Chvatal R, Habelsberger A, Schimetta W, Wayand W, Shamiyeh A, et al. Preoperative planning of surgery for deeply infiltrating endometriosis using the ENZIAN classification. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013;166(1):99–103. Thomassin-Naggara I, Monroc M, Chauveau B, Fauconnier A, Verpillat P, Dabi Y, et al. Multicenter external validation of the deep pelvic endometriosis index magnetic resonance imaging score. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(5):e2311686. Thomassin-Naggara I, Lamrabet S, Crestani A, Bekhouche A, Wahab CA, Kermarrec E, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging classification of deep pelvic endometriosis: description and impact on surgical management. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(7):1589–600. Becker CM, Bokor A, Heikinheimo O, Horne A, Jansen F, Kiesel L, et al. ESHRE guideline: endometriosis. Hum Reprod Open. 2022;2022(2):hoac009. Vanhie A, Meuleman C, Tomassetti C, Timmerman D, D’Hoore A, Wolthuis A, et al. Consensus on recording deep endometriosis surgery: the CORDES statement. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2660. Bendifallah S, Puchar A, Vesale E, Moawad G, Daraï E, Roman H. Surgical outcomes after colorectal surgery for endometriosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021;28(3):453–66. Abo C, Bendifallah S, Jayot A, Nyangoh Timoh K, Tuech JJ, Roman H, et al. Discoid resection for colorectal endometriosis: results from a prospective cohort from two French tertiary referral centres. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21(11):1312–20. Rousset P, Buisson G, Lega JC, Charlot M, Gallice C, Cotte E, et al. Rectal endometriosis: predictive MRI signs for segmental bowel resection. Eur Radiol févr. 2021;31(2):884–94. Mabrouk M, Raimondo D, Altieri M, Arena A, Del Forno S, Moro E, et al. Surgical, clinical, and functional outcomes in patients with Rectosigmoid endometriosis in the Gray zone: 13-year long-term follow-up. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(6):1110–6. Brusic A, Esler S, Churilov L, Chowdary P, Sleeman M, Maher P, et al. Deep infiltrating endometriosis: can magnetic resonance imaging anticipate the need for colorectal surgeon intervention? Eur J Radiol. 2019;121:108717. Busard MPH, van der Houwen LEE, Bleeker MCG, Pieters van den Bos IC, Cuesta MA, van Kuijk C, et al. Deep infiltrating endometriosis of the bowel: MR imaging as a method to predict muscular invasion. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37(4):549–57. Coletta D, De Padua C, Iannone I, Puzzovio A, Greco PA, Patriti A, et al. Defunctioning ileostomy to prevent the anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. The state of the art of the different available types. Front Surg. 2022;9:866191. Condous G, Gerges B, Thomassin-Naggara I, Becker C, Tomassetti C, Krentel H, et al. Non-invasive imaging techniques for diagnosis of pelvic deep endometriosis and endometriosis classification systems: an International Consensus Statement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2024;64:129–44. Ferrero S, Barra F, Scala C, Condous G. Ultrasonography for bowel endometriosis. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2021;71:38–50. Young SW, Dahiya N, Patel MD, Abrao MS, Magrina JF, Temkit M, et al. Initial accuracy of and learning curve for transvaginal ultrasound with bowel preparation for deep endometriosis in a US Tertiary Care Center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(7):1170–6. Young SW, Jha P, Chamié L, Rodgers S, Kho RM, Horrow MM, et al. Society of Radiologists in ultrasound consensus on routine pelvic US for endometriosis. Radiology. 2024;311(1):e232191. Ferrero S, Scala C, Stabilini C, Vellone VG, Barra F, Maggiore ULR. Transvaginal sonography with vs without bowel preparation in diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: prospective study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019;53(3):402–9. Ferrero S, Barra F, Stabilini C, Vellone VG, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Scala C. Does bowel preparation improve the performance of rectal water contrast transvaginal ultrasonography in diagnosing Rectosigmoid endometriosis? J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(4):1017–25. Valenzano Menada M, Remorgida V, Abbamonte LH, Nicoletti A, Ragni N, Ferrero S. Does transvaginal ultrasonography combined with water-contrast in the rectum aid in the diagnosis of rectovaginal endometriosis infiltrating the bowel? Hum Reprod. 2008;23(5):1069–75. Gerges B, Li W, Leonardi M, Mol BW, Condous G. Optimal imaging modality for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(2):190–200. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Orozco R, Perniciano M, Jurado M, Melis GB, et al. Accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for diagnosis of deep endometriosis in the rectosigmoid: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47(3):281–9. Guerriero S, Saba L, Ajossa S, Peddes C, Angiolucci M, Perniciano M, et al. Three-dimensional ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2014;29(6):1189–98. Atkinson NSS, Bryant RV, Dong Y, Maaser C, Kucharzik T, Maconi G, et al. How to perform gastrointestinal ultrasound: anatomy and normal findings. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(38):6931–41. Guerriero S, Condous G, van den Bosch T, Valentin L, Leone FPG, Van Schoubroeck D, et al. Systematic approach to sonographic evaluation of the pelvis in women with suspected endometriosis, including terms, definitions and measurements: a consensus opinion from the international deep endometriosis analysis (IDEA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;48(3):318–32. Eisenberg VH, Alcazar JL, Arbib N, Schiff E, Achiron R, Goldenberg M, et al. Applying a statistical method in transvaginal ultrasound training: lessons from the learning curve cumulative summation test (LC-CUSUM) for endometriosis mapping. Gynecol Surg. 2017;14(1):19. Piessens S, Healey M, Maher P, Tsaltas J, Rombauts L. Can anyone screen for deep infiltrating endometriosis with transvaginal ultrasound? Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;54(5):462–8. Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PMM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2(2):CD009591. Alborzi S, Poordast T, Askary E, Javedanmehr M, Shahraki MH, Alborzi S, et al. Evaluation and comparison of the accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound and MRI for the diagnosis of deep rectal endometriosis: a cross-sectional study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;161(2):586–93. Moura APC, Ribeiro HSAA, Bernardo WM, Simões R, Torres US, D’Ippolito G, et al. Accuracy of transvaginal sonography versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(4):e0214842. Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Pascual MA, Rodriguez I, Piras A, Perniciano M, et al. Ultrasonographic soft markers for detection of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;55(2):269–73. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Cromi A, Duwe DG, Beretta P, Buttarelli M, et al. « kissing ovaries »: a sonographic sign of moderate to severe endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(1):143–7. Hudelist G, Fritzer N, Staettner S, Tammaa A, Tinelli A, Sparic R, et al. Uterine sliding sign: a simple sonographic predictor for presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013;41(6):692–5. Bazot M, Bharwani N, Huchon C, Kinkel K, Cunha TM, Guerra A, et al. European society of urogenital radiology (ESUR) guidelines: MR imaging of pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(7):2765–75. Bazot M, Darai E, Hourani R, Thomassin I, Cortez A, Uzan S, et al. Deep pelvic endometriosis: MR imaging for diagnosis and prediction of extension of disease. Radiology. 2004;232(2):379–89. Bazot M, Gasner A, Lafont C, Ballester M, Daraï E. Deep pelvic endometriosis: limited additional diagnostic value of postcontrast in comparison with conventional MR images. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80(3):e331–9. Yoon JH, Choi D, Jang KT, Kim CK, Kim H, Lee SJ, et al. Deep rectosigmoid endometriosis: “mushroom cap” sign on T2-weighted MR imaging. Abdom Imaging. 2010;35(6):726–31. Thomassin-Naggara I, Rousset P, Touboul C, Razakamanantsoa L, Manganaro L. Reasons why it is time to change imaging guidelines on endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2024;34:6175. Chassang M, Novellas S, Bloch-Marcotte C, Delotte J, Toullalan O, Bongain A, et al. Utility of vaginal and rectal contrast medium in MRI for the detection of deep pelvic endometriosis. Eur Radiol. 2010;20(4):1003–10. Takeuchi H, Kuwatsuru R, Kitade M, Sakurai A, Kikuchi I, Shimanuki H, et al. A novel technique using magnetic resonance imaging jelly for evaluation of rectovaginal endometriosis. Fertil Steril. 2005;83(2):442–7. Hottat N, Larrousse C, Anaf V, Noël JC, Matos C, Absil J, et al. Endometriosis: contribution of 3.0-T pelvic MR imaging in preoperative assessment—initial results. Radiology. 2009;253(1):126–34. Guerriero S, Saba L, Pascual MA, Ajossa S, Rodriguez I, Mais V, et al. Transvaginal ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018;51(5):586–95. Abrao MS, Gonçalves MO, Dias JA, Podgaec S, Chamie LP, Blasbalg R. Comparison between clinical examination, transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of deep endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(12):3092–7. Sloss S, Mooney S, Ellett L, Readman E, Ma T, Brouwer R, et al. Preoperative imaging in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis: an important aid in predicting depth of infiltration in rectosigmoid disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(5):633–40. Ruaux E, VanBuren WM, Nougaret S, Gavrel M, Charlot M, Grangeon F, et al. Endometriosis MR mimickers: T2-hypointense lesions. Insights Imaging. 2024;15(1):20. Millischer AE, Salomon LJ, Santulli P, Borghese B, Dousset B, Chapron C. Fusion imaging for evaluation of deep infiltrating endometriosis: feasibility and preliminary results. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;46(1):109–17. Bazot M, Spagnoli F, Guerriero S. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion technique in gynecology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2022;59(2):141–5. Rossi L, Palazzo L, Yazbeck C, Walker F, Chis C, Luton D, et al. Can rectal endoscopic sonography be used to predict infiltration depth in patients with deep infiltrating endometriosis of the rectum? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;43(3):322–7. Bazot M, Bornier C, Dubernard G, Roseau G, Cortez A, Daraï E. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and rectal endoscopic sonography for the prediction of location of deep pelvic endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(5):1457–63. Kim A, Fernandez P, Martin B, Palazzo L, Ribeiro-Parenti L, Walker F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging compared with rectal endoscopic sonography for the prediction of infiltration depth in colorectal endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017;24(7):1218–26. Noventa M, Scioscia M, Schincariol M, Cavallin F, Pontrelli G, Virgilio B, et al. Imaging modalities for diagnosis of deep pelvic endometriosis: comparison between trans-vaginal Sonography, rectal endoscopy sonography and magnetic resonance imaging. A head-to-head meta-analysis. Diagnostics. 2019;9(4):225. Ferrero S, Biscaldi E, Vellone VG, Venturini PL, Maggiore ULR. Computed tomographic colonography vs rectal water- contrast transvaginal sonography in diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis: a pilot study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017;49(4):515–23. Biscaldi E, Ferrero S, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, Rollandi GA. Multidetector computerized tomography enema versus magnetic resonance enema in the diagnosis of rectosigmoid endometriosis. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(2):261–7. Ribeiro HSAA, Ribeiro PA, Rossini L, Rodrigues FC, Donadio N, Aoki T. Double-contrast barium enema and transrectal endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis of intestinal deeply infiltrating endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(3):315–20. Savelli L, Manuzzi L, Coe M, Mabrouk M, Di Donato N, Venturoli S, et al. Comparison of transvaginal sonography and double-contrast barium enema for diagnosing deep infiltrating endometriosis of the posterior compartment. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(4):466–71. Jaramillo-Cardoso A, Shenoy-Bhangle A, Garces-Descovich A, Glickman J, King L, Mortele KJ. Pelvic MRI in the diagnosis and staging of pelvic endometriosis: added value of structured reporting and expertise. Abdom Radiol. 2020;45(6):1623–36. Bazot M, Daraï E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(3):389–97. Aas-Eng MK, Dauser B, Lieng M, Diep LM, Leonardi M, Condous G, et al. Transvaginal sonography accurately measures lesion-to-anal-verge distance in women with deep endometriosis of the rectosigmoid. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020;56(5):766–72. Han YE, Park BJ, Sung DJ, Kim MJ, Han NY, Sim KC, et al. How to accurately measure the distance from the anal verge to rectal cancer on MRI: a prospective study using anal verge markers. Abdom Radiol. 2021;46(2):449–58. D’Souza N, Balyasnikova S, Tudyka V, Lord A, Shaw A, Abulafi M, et al. Variation in landmarks for the rectum: an MRI study. Colorectal Dis. 2018;20(10):O304–9. Sim KC, Park BJ, Kim MJ, Sung DJ, Han NY, Han YE, et al. Accuracy of MRI for predicting anterior peritoneal reflection involvement in locally advanced rectal cancer: a comparison with operative findings. Abdom Radiol. 2022;47(2):508–16. Aas-Eng MK, Lieng M, Dauser B, Diep LM, Leonardi M, Condous G, et al. Transvaginal sonography determines accurately extent of infiltration of rectosigmoid deep endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021;58(6):933–9. Perandini A, Perandini S, Montemezzi S, Bonin C, Bellini G, Bergamini V. Defining probabilities of bowel resection in deep endometriosis of the rectum: prediction with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2018;44(2):292–7. Roman H, Bubenheim M, Huet E, Bridoux V, Zacharopoulou C, Collinet P, et al. Baseline severe constipation negatively impacts functional outcomes of surgery for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: results of the ENDORE randomized trial. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019;48(8):625–9. Roman H, Moatassim-Drissa S, Marty N, Milles M, Vallée A, Desnyder E, et al. Rectal shaving for deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a 5-year continuous retrospective series. Fertil Steril. 2016;106(6):1438–1445.e2. Roman H, Bubenheim M, Huet E, Bridoux V, Zacharopoulou C, Daraï E, et al. Conservative surgery versus colorectal resection in deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum: a randomized trial. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(1):47–57. Abrão MS, Podgaec S, Dias JA, Averbach M, Silva LFF, Marino de Carvalho F. Endometriosis lesions that compromise the rectum deeper than the inner muscularis layer have more than 40% of the circumference of the rectum affected by the disease. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2008;15(3):280–5. Malzoni M, Casarella L, Coppola M, Falcone F, Iuzzolino D, Rasile M, et al. Preoperative ultrasound indications determine excision technique for bowel surgery for deep infiltrating endometriosis: a single, high-volume center. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2020;27(5):1141–7. Scardapane A, Lorusso F, Francavilla M, Bettocchi S, Fascilla FD, Angelelli G, et al. Magnetic resonance colonography may predict the need for bowel resection in colorectal endometriosis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:5981217. Philip CA, Bisch C, Coulon A, Maissiat E, de Saint-Hilaire P, Huissoud C, et al. Three-dimensional sonorectography: a new transvaginal ultrasound technique with intrarectal contrast to assess colorectal endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015;45(2):233–5. Buy JN, Ghossain M. Secondary Mullerian system. In: Buy JN, Ghossain M, editors. Gynecological imaging: a reference guide to diagnosis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2013. p. 439–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31012-6_17. Ceccaroni M, Clarizia R, Bruni F, D’Urso E, Gagliardi ML, Roviglione G, et al. Nerve-sparing laparoscopic eradication of deep endometriosis with segmental rectal and parametrial resection: the Negrar method. A single-center, prospective, clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(7):2029–45. Ruffo G, Sartori A, Crippa S, Partelli S, Barugola G, Manzoni A, et al. Laparoscopic rectal resection for severe endometriosis of the mid and low rectum: technique and operative results. Surg Endosc. 2012;26(4):1035–40. Nezhat C, Falik R, McKinney S, King LP. Pathophysiology and management of urinary tract endometriosis. Nat Rev Urol. 2017;14(6):359–72. Tosti C, Pinzauti S, Santulli P, Chapron C, Petraglia F. Pathogenetic mechanisms of deep infiltrating endometriosis. Reprod Sci. 2015;22(9):1053–9. Härmä K, Binda A, Ith M, Poellinger A, Siegenthaler F, Heverhagen J, et al. Cloverleaf sign in pelvic magnetic resonance imaging for deep infiltrating endometriosis: association with longer operation times, greater blood loss, and higher rates of bowel resection. Invest Radiol. 2020;55(1):53–9. Abrão MS, Petraglia F, Falcone T, Keckstein J, Osuga Y, Chapron C. Deep endometriosis infiltrating the recto-sigmoid: critical factors to consider before management. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21(3):329–39. Rousset P, Peyron N, Charlot M, Chateau F, Golfier F, Raudrant D, et al. Bowel endometriosis: preoperative diagnostic accuracy of 3.0-T MR enterography–initial results. Radiology. 2014;273(1):117–24. Belghiti J, Thomassin-Naggara I, Zacharopoulou C, Zilberman S, Jarboui L, Bazot M, et al. Contribution of Computed Tomography Enema and Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Diagnose Multifocal and Multicentric Bowel Lesions in Patients With Colorectal Endometriosis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2015;22(5):776–84. Woo S, Suh CH, Kim H. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography for bowel endometriosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2019;119:108638. Nisenblat V, Bossuyt PM, Farquhar C, Johnson N, Hull ML. Imaging modalities for the non-invasive diagnosis of endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 2:CD009591. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Editor information Editors and Affiliations Rights and permissions Copyright information © 2025 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG About this chapter Cite this chapter Rousset, P., Ruaux, E., Bolze, PA., Cotte, E., Thomassin-Naggara, I., Golfier, F. (2025). Posterocentral Compartment (Rectum). In: Thomassin-Naggara, I. (eds) Imaging of Endometriosis: A Comparative Guide of US, MRI and Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_9 Download citation DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82750-1_9 Published: Publisher Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-031-82749-5 Online ISBN: 978-3-031-82750-1 eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Outcome instruments

Enzian

Citation neighborhood

Papers in the corpus that this work cites (lower rings, blue) and that cite this one (upper rings, green). Dot size scales with the paper's in-corpus citation count — bigger dot = more influential within the endo/adeno field. Click a dot to open that paper. [ expand to 2 hops ] — adds papers reached through this work's immediate citers/citees. Heavier; up to 60 extra dots.

References (89)

Source provenance

openalex
last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00
License: CC0 · commercial use OK