Surgical Scar Endometriosis: An Emerging Enigma

Introduction Surgical scar endometriosis is a subtype of extra-pelvic endometriosis that is characterized by the formation of endometrial tissue near the incision site in patients who have previously undergone surgery. In recent times, with the increasing trend in Caesarean sections, the incidence of surgical scar endometriosis has also emerged. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and management of surgical scar endometriosis. Methodology We conducted this cross-sectional, observational study over eight years (2015-2022) in a tertiary care centre in Madurai district, Tamil Nadu, India. We conducted this study after acquiring an ethical certificate from the institutional ethics committee (IEC No. VMCIEC/22/2018). In this study, we sampled all women (n = 32) with a pathological diagnosis of scar endometriosis during the study period from hospital records (universal sampling). We searched the data for both general characteristics and lesion characteristics of the patients. The general characteristics include age, body mass index (BMI), parity, mode of delivery, symptoms, and imaging by ultrasound. We have recorded the lesion characteristics of the patient, including location and size of scar endometriosis, layers involved in scar endometriosis, and surgical technique from surgical notes written in the case sheet. The minimum sample size required for this study was 31 study subjects. We entered the data into Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed it in SPSS version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). We expressed the quantitative variables in terms of mean and standard deviation and the qualitative variables in terms of frequency and percentage.

The mean age of the study participants was 34 years (range 23-55 years). In our study, 29 patients (90.6%) were multi-para, and only three (9.4%) were nullipara. Among 29 parous women, the majority (25, or 77.7%) had delivered by Caesarean section, while only four (12.5%) delivered by normal vaginal delivery. The surgical procedures preceding the scar endometriosis were predominantly obstetric procedures (87.4%), out of which 25 patients underwent a Caesarean section and only three underwent an episiotomy. The most common presenting symptom of scar endometriosis in our study was cyclical pain in the scar site (90.4%), followed by swelling (81.25%). In 62.5% of patients, the duration between the presentation of surgical scar endometriosis and surgical intervention was greater than one year. Subcutaneous tissue (90.6%) was the most commonly involved layer in surgical scar endometriosis, followed by the rectus sheath (86.2%). The surgical procedure done for scar endometriosis was wide local excision in 78% of patients, and the remaining 22% of patients had wide local excision with mesh repair.

Cesarean section is an obvious risk factor for surgical scar endometriosis. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for surgical scar endometriosis in women presenting with cyclic pain at the scar site. Ultrasound is accurate in diagnosing scar endometriosis. Surgical management by wide local excision with a clear margin with or without mesh repair is the treatment of choice. Categories: Medical Education, Obstetrics/Gynecology, General Surgery

cross-sectional study, lesion characteristics, demographic characteristics, surgical management, surgical scar endometriosis, cesarean section

Endometriosis is a benign gynecological disorder characterized by the growth of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. Endometriosis is an estrogen-dependent chronic inflammatory disease that can affect either the pelvic or extra-pelvic regions of a woman’s body. We classify it as either pelvic or extra-pelvic endometriosis [1] . 1 1 1 Open Access Original Article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35089 How to cite this article Durairaj A, Sivamani H, Panneerselvam M (February 16, 2023) Surgical Scar Endometriosis: An Emerging Enigma. Cureus 15(2): e35089. DOI 10.7759/cureus.35089 Endometriosis is a common condition that affects 5-10% of all women and can cause severe discomfort as well as infertility. It is estimated that endometriosis affects 89 million women of reproductive age around the world [2] . When endometriotic implants are found in areas of the body that are not associated with the pelvic organs, we refer this condition to as having extra pelvic endometriosis. These locations include the gastrointestinal tract, the urinary tract, the lungs, the abdominal wall, and the central nervous system. Surgical scar endometriosis, also known as SSE, is a subtype of extra-pelvic endometriosis that is characterized by the formation of endometrial tissue near the incision site in patients who have previously undergone surgery. The researchers have described only a few examples of surgical scar endometriosis in the medical literature, making this a rare clinical condition. There have been reports of scar endometriosis developing after obstetric and gynecological surgeries, such as Cesarean sections, vaginal deliveries in episiotomy sites, laparotomies or laparoscopic port sites for hysterectomy, tubectomy, ectopic pregnancies, ovarian cystectomies, hernial repair sites, and even needle tracked after amniocentesis [3,4] . This iatrogenic

is still a mystery, and the exact etiology of surgical scar endometriosis is unknown; there are several hypotheses that attempt to explain its development. There is a wide range of variation in the incidence of surgical scar endometriosis, ranging from 0.03% to 1.08% [5,6] . Due to the unusual presentation of these patients, general physicians, surgeons, or dermatologists may be their initial point of contact. Because of this, it is imperative that medical professionals have more education regarding this disorder [7] . In recent times, with the increasing trend of Caesarean sections, the incidence of SSE has also emerged. This study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and management of surgical scar endometriosis.

Study design, duration, and ethical clearance We conducted this cross-sectional, observational study over eight years (2015-2022) in a tertiary care centre in Madurai district, Tamil Nadu, after acquiring an ethical certificate from the institutional ethics committee of Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai (IEC No. VMCIEC/22/2018). Study sampling and data collection In this study, we sampled all women (n = 32) with a pathological diagnosis of scar endometriosis during the study period from hospital records (universal sampling). We searched the data for both general characteristics and lesion characteristics of the patients. The general characteristics include age, body mass index (BMI), parity, mode of delivery, symptoms, the duration between index surgery and the onset of symptoms, and imaging by ultrasound (diagnosis). We have recorded the lesion characteristics of the patient, including location and size of scar endometriosis, layers involved in scar endometriosis, and surgical technique from surgical notes written in the case sheet. Sample size The minimum sample size required for this study was 31 study subjects. We calculated the sample size by using the formula 3.84*p*q/d 2 , where p is prevalence, q is the complement of p, and d is absolute precision (which was 5%). We collected the prevalence from the study by Yuan et al. in China, where they conclude that the prevalence of abdominal wall endometriosis is 1.96% [8] . Statistical analysis We entered the data into Excel (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed it in Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). We expressed the quantitative variables in terms of mean and standard deviation, and we expressed the qualitative variables in terms of frequency and percentage. The current study was an exploratory one, and we did not assign an outcome variable.

We included about 32 patients with a pathological diagnosis of surgical scar endometriosis in our study, and we analyzed their results. Table 1 shows the general characteristics of patients with surgical scar endometriosis. The mean age of the study participants was 34 years (range 23-55 years). The mean BMI in our study was 29.15, of which 43.8% were obese. In our study, 29 patients (90.6%) were multi-para, and only three (9.4%) were nullipara. Among 29 parous women, the majority (25, or 77.7%) had delivered by Caesarean section, while only four (12.5%) delivered by normal vaginal delivery. 2023 Durairaj et al. Cureus 15(2): e35089. DOI 10.7759/cureus.35089 2 of 7 General characteristics Frequency Percent Age (in years) Mean – 34.47 standard deviation – 8.39 BMI (kg/m 2 ) Mean – 29.15 standard deviation – 4.72 Underweight (18) 0 0 Normal (18.5 – 24.9) 7 21.8 Overweight (25 – 29.9) 11 34.4 Obese >30 14 43.8 Parity Nullipara 3 9.4 Multipara 29 90.6 Mode of delivery Normal vaginal delivery 4 12.5 1 LSCS 8 25.0 2 LSCS 17 52.5 TABLE 1: General characteristics of the study participants (n=32) BMI – Body Mass Index, LSCS – Lower Segment Cesarean Section Table 2 shows the lesion characteristics of patients with surgical scar endometriosis. The surgical procedures preceding the scar endometriosis were predominantly obstetric procedures (87.4%), out of which 25 patients underwent a Caesarean section and only three underwent an episiotomy. Two of the procedures preceding scar endometriosis were hysterectomy and endometriotic cyst excision. The mean interval between index surgery and clinical presentation of surgical scar endometriosis was 6.19 years. The most common presenting symptom of scar endometriosis in our study was a cyclical pain in the scar site (90.4%), followed by swelling (81.25%). Lesion characteristics Frequency Percent Index surgery Episiotomy 3 9.4 LSCS 25 78.0 Hysterectomy 2 6.3 Laparoscopic cyst excision for endometriosis 2 6.3 Duration between index surgery and onset of symptoms (in years) Mean – 6.19 Standard deviation – 4.25 Symptoms Cyclical pain at scar 29 90.4 Swelling or lump 26 81.25 Cyclical bleeding from lump 4 12.5 Dysmenorrhea 21 65.6 Ultrasound diagnosis of scar endometriosis Correct 31 96.8 Wrong 1 3.2 Preoperative medical management 11 34.4 2023 Durairaj et al. Cureus 15(2): e35089. DOI 10.7759/cureus.35089 3 of 7 Duration between onset of symptom and surgery Within 1 year 12 37.5 More than 1 year 23 62.5 Location of scar endometriosis Abdominal wall scar I Suprapubic transverse scar i) Left lateral 17 52.5 ii) midline 5 15.5 iii) Right lateral 5 15.5 II Port site scar i) Left Lateral 1 3.1 ii) Umbilical 1 3.1 Episiotomy scar 3 9.4 Size of scar endometriosis Layers involved in scar endometriosis Skin involvement 12/32 37.5 Subcutaneous tissue 29/32 90.6 Rectus sheath 25/29 86.2 Rectus muscle 4 /29 13.7 Peritoneum 12/29 3.1 Perineal muscle 1/3 3.1 Surgical Procedure Wide local excision 25 78.0 Wide local excision with mesh repair 7 22.0 TABLE 2: Lesion characteristics and symptoms of the study participants (n=32) LSCS – Lower Segment Cesarean Section Preoperative imaging included ultrasonography in all patients, which is accurate in 96.8% of cases. 34.4% of patients had tried medical management of scar endometriosis before definitive surgical intervention. In 62.5% of patients, the duration between the presentation of surgical scar endometriosis and surgical intervention was greater than one year. In our study we reported the location of surgical scar endometriosis in three sites, namely abdominal wall suprapubic transverse scar in 27 patients (83.5%), abdominal wall port scar in two patients (9.4%), and perineal episiotomy scar in three patients (9.4%). The mean size of the surgical scar endometriosis lesion was 4.5 x 3.5 cm. Subcutaneous tissue (90.6%) was the most commonly involved layer in surgical scar endometriosis, followed by the rectus sheath (86.2%). The surgical procedure done for scar endometriosis was wide local excision in 78% of patients, and the remaining 22% of patients had wide local excision with mesh repair.

Surgical scar endometriosis remains an enigma. The exact cause and natural progression of endometriosis are yet to be determined. Surgeons transplant directly active endometrial cells onto the layers of a surgically incised lesion, and these cells defy immune-mediated apoptosis, allowing an ectopic endometrial cell to survive [9,10] . The estrogen-dependent inflammatory response theory explains the natural progression of endometriosis and its symptoms. We analyzed this emerging iatrogenic complication in the present study. 2023 Durairaj et al. Cureus 15(2): e35089. DOI 10.7759/cureus.35089 4 of 7 The mean age of the women with surgical scar endometriosis in our study was 34 years. A study by Yildirim et al. [11] and Zhang et al. [12] also reported a mean age of 31 and 34 years, respectively. We attributed this high prevalence among women of childbearing age to an increase in surgical scar endometriosis patients following Caesarean sections. In our study, patients presenting beyond the reproductive age group were following gynecological procedures. The mean BMI in our study was 29.15, among which 43.8% were obese, which suggests an increased prevalence of scar endometriosis in obese individuals. This finding was similar to the results of the study conducted by Sumathy et al. [13] and Ding et al. [14] . Obesity can provide a wide surgical surface for the entrapment of active endometrial cells and may start the process [10] . Among 29 parous women with surgical scar endometriosis, the majority (25, or 77.7%) had delivered by Caesarean section and only four (12.5%) had delivered by normal vaginal delivery. The index surgery is the one that results in the development or occurrence of endometriosis at the surgical scar site, and we thought it to be an obvious risk factor for surgical scar endometriosis. The index surgeries preceding the scar endometriosis in our study were predominantly obstetric procedures (87.4%), out of which 25 patients were following a Caesarean section. We considered scar endometriosis to increase with parity because of more adhesions and non-closure of peritoneal layers, exposing endometrial cells to the abdominal cavity [15] . Only three women in our study had surgical scar endometriosis after episiotomy, which is because of shedding decidual endometrial tissue implants on the episiotomy site [16] . In our study, four women developed surgical scar endometriosis following gynecological procedures, of which two underwent laparoscopic endometriotic cystectomy and two underwent abdominal hysterectomy. This could be because of the inoculation of endometrial cells onto the incision site while removing the specimen. The mean interval between index surgery and the clinical presentation of surgical scar endometriosis was 6.19 years (range 2-10 years). Scar endometriosis has a sluggish onset, initially manifesting as cyclical discomfort that is frequently misdiagnosed as dysmenorrhea. The patient usually presents when there is the development of a lump at the scar site. The most common presenting symptoms of surgical scar endometriosis were cyclical pain, followed by a lump at the scar site. In our study, we observed a cyclical pain, a characteristic symptom of scar endometriosis, in 90% of participants. We found similar findings in a study conducted by Zhang et al. [12] and Buscemi et al. [17] . Cyclical hemorrhage of functioning endometrium in response to hormonal changes is the reason for cyclic pain at the scar site. Cyclical bleeding from the scar site is the specific feature of surgical scar endometriosis, but we report it in only 12.5% of the patients in our study. In our study, we found surgical scar endometriosis in three locations: the abdominal wall suprapubic transverse scar, the abdominal wall laparoscopic port site, and the episiotomy scar. Among the 27 cases of abdominal wall suprapubic transverse scar endometriosis, 25 were following Caesarean sections, and only two were following abdominal hysterectomy. Two cases of abdominal wall port site endometriosis were following laparoscopic endometriotic cyst excision, and three cases of episiotomy scar endometriosis were following vaginal delivery. The mean size of the surgical scar endometriosis lesion was 4.5 by 3.5 centimeters. Subcutaneous tissue involvement (90.6%), followed by involvement of the rectus sheath (86.2%), was the most prevalent pattern of involvement in surgical scar endometriosis. The study conducted by Sumathy et al. showed 100% of the individuals had subcutaneous tissue involvement and 75% had rectus sheath involvement [13] . We only used imaging as a supplement to a high index of clinical suspicion for diagnosing SSE. Ultrasonography was accurate in 96.8% of patients with scar endometriosis in our study. This finding is comparable to those by Yuan et al. [8] and Zhang et al. [12] . The sonographic appearance of scar endometriosis is predominantly hypoechoic and heterogeneous, with scattered internal echoes at the surgical scar site with limited vascularity [18,19] . Ultrasound imaging eliminates differential diagnoses such as suture granuloma, hematoma, neuroma, hernia, and neoplasia of surgical scar endometriosis, which not only helps in making an accurate diagnosis but also aids in presurgical mapping [20] . The treatment options for surgical scar endometriosis are medical therapy and surgical interventions. Medical therapy with oral contraceptive pills (OCPs), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), and danazol is usually futile, providing only temporary symptomatic relief that will recur at a later date. In our study, 34.4% of patients had tried medical management of scar endometriosis before definitive surgical intervention. Hence, surgical intervention is the definitive treatment. We should consider abdominal wall reconstruction with mesh besides wide local excision in larger lesions involving the rectus sheath or muscle that leave a wide post-excisional defect [13] . Failure to do so might cause an incisional hernia, as the approximation of layers is under tension and weak. Complete resection with a 1 cm clear margin and avoiding contamination while handling is critical to preventing recurrence after surgery. The complications of surgical scar endometriosis are recurrence and malignant transformation. A study conducted by Ding and Zhu reported a recurrence rate of 1.5% [14] . The key to preventing SSE recurrence after surgery is complete resection with a 1 cm clear margin and avoiding endometriotic cell contamination of the field while handling. Transformation of SSE is multifactorial, involving genetic, immunological, and environmental factors. Clear cell carcinoma is the most common histological subtype, followed by 2023 Durairaj et al. Cureus 15(2): e35089. DOI 10.7759/cureus.35089 5 of 7 endometrial carcinoma [21] . Prevention of surgical scar endometriosis is an absolute need. We must keep the contamination of the surgical incision layers with decidual or endometrial cells to a minimum in order to accomplish this prevention. They prevented cesarean scar endometriosis by performing an intro-flexed suture of the uterine incision and by closing the visceral and parietal peritoneum [22] . Placing the specimen in an endo-bag and irrigating the port with saline will prevent the development of endometriosis at the port site [23] . Changing gloves before repairing an episiotomy scar and making sure the wound is free of decidua are both effective ways to reduce the risk of endometriosis developing in the scar tissue [24] .

of the study Though our study met the minimum required sample size, a multi-centric study with a larger sample size may yield better results. Our study didn’t estimate the recurrence rate since this was a cross-sectional study. Since this study was an exploratory study, we did not assign an outcome variable, and we performed no inferential statistics.

We directly related surgical scar endometriosis to obstetrics and gynecological surgeries. Cesarean section is an obvious risk factor for surgical scar endometriosis. Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion for surgical scar endometriosis in women presenting with cyclic pain on the scar site. Ultrasound is accurate in diagnosing scar endometriosis. Medical management offers only temporary relief to be presented at a later date, and hence surgical intervention is the definitive treatment. Surgical management by wide local excision with a clear margin with or without mesh repair is the treatment of choice. We can prevent this iatrogenic complication by practicing certain surgical precautions. Additional Information Disclosures Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Institutional Ethics Committee of Velammal Medical College Hospital and Research Institute, Madurai issued approval VMCIEC/22/2018. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

1 . Chmaj-Wierzchowska K, Pieta B, Czerniak T, Opala T: Endometriosis in a post-laparoscopic scar--case report and literature review . Ginekol Pol. 2014, 85:386-9. 10.17772/gp/1737 2 . Danielpour PJ, Layke JC, Durie N, Glickman LT: Scar endometriosis - a rare cause for a painful scar: a case report and review of the literature . Can J Plast Surg. 2010, 18:19-20. 10.1177/229255031001800110 3 . Paşalega M, Mirea C, Vîlcea ID, et al.: Parietal abdominal endometriosis following Cesarean section . Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2011, 52:503-8. 4 . Khachani I, Filali Adib A, Bezad R: Cesarean scar endometriosis: an uncommon surgical complication on the rise? Case report and literature review . Case Rep Obstet Gynecol. 2017, 2017:8062924. 10.1155/2017/8062924 5 . Chatterjee SK: Scar endometriosis: a clinicopathologic study of 17 cases . Obstet Gynecol. 1980, 56:81-4. 6 . Teng CC, Yang HM, Chen KF, Yang CJ, Chen LS, Kuo CL: Abdominal wall endometriosis: an overlooked but possibly preventable complication . Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2008, 47:42-8. 10.1016/S1028-4559(08)60053-4 7 . Goel P, Devi L, Tandon R, Saha PK, Dalal A: Scar endometriosis - a series of six patients . Int J Surg. 2011, 9:39-40. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.08.003 8 . Yuan L, Zhang JH, Liu XS: [Clinicopathological features of 151 cases with abdominal wall endometriosis] . Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi. 2013, 48:113-7. 9 . Wang PH, Juang CM, Chao HT, Yu KJ, Yuan CC, Ng HT: Wound endometriosis: risk factor evaluation and treatment . J Chin Med Assoc. 2003, 66:113-9. 10 . Uçar MG, Şanlıkan F, Göçmen A: Surgical treatment of scar endometriosis following cesarean section, a series of 12 cases . Indian J Surg. 2015, 77:682-6. 10.1007/s12262-013-0978-1 11 . Yıldırım D, Tatar C, Doğan O, et al.: Post-cesarean scar endometriosis . Turk J Obstet Gynecol. 2018, 15:33-8. 10.4274/tjod.90922 12 . Zhang P, Sun Y, Zhang C, Yang Y, Zhang L, Wang N, Xu H: Cesarean scar endometriosis: presentation of 198 cases and literature review . BMC Womens Health. 2019, 19:14. 10.1186/s12905-019-0711-8 13 . Sumathy S, Mangalakanthi J, Purushothaman K, Sharma D, Remadevi C, Sreedhar S: Symptomatology and surgical perspective of scar endometriosis: a case series of 16 women . J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2017, 67:218- 23. 10.1007/s13224-016-0945-4 14 . Ding Y, Zhu J: A retrospective review of abdominal wall endometriosis in Shanghai, China . Int J Gynaecol 2023 Durairaj et al. Cureus 15(2): e35089. DOI 10.7759/cureus.35089 6 of 7 Obstet. 2013, 121:41-4. 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.11.011 15 . Minaglia S, Mishell DR Jr, Ballard CA: Incisional endometriomas after Cesarean section: a case series . J Reprod Med. 2007, 52:630-4. 16 . Dadhwal V, Sharma A, Khoiwal K, Nakra T: Episiotomy scar endometriosis . Med J Armed Forces India. 2018, 74:297-9. 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.06.004 17 . Buscemi S, Maiorana A, Fazzotta S, et al.: Scar endometriosis: not a rare cause for a painful scar . Clin Ter. 2021, 172:129-33. 10.7417/CT.2021.2299 18 . Radswiki T: Scar endometriosis . Radiopaedia. 2023, 10.53347/rID-15358 19 . Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JB: Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography . AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006, 186:616-20. 10.2214/AJR.04.1619 20 . Busard MP, Mijatovic V, van Kuijk C, Hompes PG, van Waesberghe JH: Appearance of abdominal wall endometriosis on MR imaging . Eur Radiol. 2010, 20:1267-76. 10.1007/s00330-009-1658-1 21 . Mihailovici A, Rottenstreich M, Kovel S, Wassermann I, Smorgick N, Vaknin Z: Endometriosis-associated malignant transformation in abdominal surgical scar: a PRISMA-compliant systematic review . Medicine (Baltimore). 2017, 96:e9136. 10.1097/MD.0000000000009136 22 . Plotski A: Endometriosis of postoperative scar . Scars. Chiriac A (ed): IntechOpen, London; 2019. 10.5772/intechopen.88246 23 . Ao X, Xiong W, Tan SQ: Laparoscopic umbilical trocar port site endometriosis: a case report . World J Clin Cases. 2020, 8:1532-7. 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i8.1532 24 . Bindra V, Reddy N, Reddy CA, Swetha P, Alapati KV, Nori M: Recurrent perineal scar endometriosis: a case report . Case Rep Womens Health. 2022, 36:e00457. 10.1016/j.crwh.2022.e00457 2023 Durairaj et al. Cureus 15(2): e35089. DOI 10.7759/cureus.35089 7 of 7