Adnexal masses: what is the role of ultrasonographic imaging?

Purpose Adnexal masses represent a common finding among both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. This article will concentrate on the importance of an accurate preoperative diagnosis of adnexal masses that may be encountered in the course of an assessment of the female pelvis. The ultrasonographic modalities including two-dimensional, Doppler, three-dimensional and real-time four-dimensional approach, the accuracy of the technique, and the role of second-level exam will be discussed.

In this review, we searched for the most relevant articles on the topic with a special focus on the importance of an accurate preoperative diagnosis of adnexal masses, the different ultrasonographic modalities, and the role of second-level exam.

The primary goal of diagnostic evaluation is to exclude malignancy. Furthermore, differentiation among pelvic masses with non-malignant features is relevant as well since suitable counseling and treatment depend on the suspected histology. Ultrasound represents the first-line modality for assessing adnexal masses and showed a very accurate examination. Ultrasound, performed by experienced operators, is effective in the morphologic evaluation of the adnexal masses and is useful in discriminating between benign and malignant lesions. Second-level exams may include assessment by an experienced ultrasound examiner, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography.

Ultrasound represents the first-line modality for assessing adnexal masses. Predicting the nature of an adnexal mass is essential regarding counseling, clinical management and surgical planning in such patients. Pattern recognition can accurately diagnose the majority of the benign masses and malignancies. Similar content being viewed by others

Liu J, Zanotti KM (2011) Management of the adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol 117:1413–1428 Borgfeldt C, Andolf E (1999) Transvaginal sonographic ovarian findings in a random sample of women 25–40 years old. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:345–350 Hartge P, Hayes R, Reding D et al (2000) Complex ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women are not associated with ovarian cancer risk factors: preliminary data from the prostate, lung, colon, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1232–1237 Castillo G, Alcázar JL, Jurado M (2004) Natural history of sonographically detected simple unilocular adnexal cysts in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol 92:965–969 Royal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists (2010) Ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women. Guideline No. 34 (October 2003 Reviewed 2010) Brown DL, Dudiak KM, Laing FC (2010) Adnexal masses: US characterization and reporting. Radiology 254:342–354 Faschingbauer F, Benz M, Häberle L et al (2012) Subjective assessment of ovarian masses using pattern recognition: the impact of experience on diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1663–1669 Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ (2007) Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43–66 Graham L (2008) ACOG releases guidelines on management of adnexal masses. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Am Fam Physician 77:1320–1323 NIH consensus conference (1995) Ovarian cancer. Screening, treatment, and follow-up. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Ovarian Cancer. JAMA 273:491–497 Joshi M, Ganesan K, Munshi HN, Ganesan S, Lawande A (2008) Ultrasound of adnexal masses. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 29:72–97 Conway C, Zalud I, Dilena M et al (1998) Simple cyst in the postmenopausal patient: detection and management. J Ultrasound Med 17:369–372 Testa AC, Bourne TH (2009) Characterising pelvic masses using ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23:725–738 De Kroon CD, Van der Sandt HA, Van Houwelingen JC, Jansen FW (2004) Sonographic assessment of non-malignant ovarian cysts: does sonohistology exist? Hum Reprod 19:2138–2143 McKenna A, Fabres C, Alam V, Morales V (2000) Clinical management of functional ovarian cysts: a prospective and randomized study. Hum Reprod 15:2567–2569 Update Cochrane (2009) Oral contraceptives for functional ovarian cysts. Obstet Gynecol 114:679–680 Sarkar M, Wolf MG (2012) Simple ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women: scope of conservative management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 162:75–78 Vigano P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, Vercellini P (2004) Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:177–200 Giudice LC, Kao LC (2004) Endometriosis. Lancet 364:1789–1799 Fauconnier A, Chapron C (2005) Endometriosis and pelvic pain: epidemiological evidence of the relationship and implications. Hum Reprod Update 11:595–606 Hummelshoj L, Prentice A, Groothuis P (2006) Update on endometriosis. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2:53–56 Jenkins S, Olive DL, Haney AF (1986) Endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomic distribution. Obstet Gynecol 67:335–338 Redwine DB (1999) Ovarian endometriosis: a marker for more extensive pelvic and intestinal disease. Fertil Steril 72:310–315 Moore J, Copley S, Morris J, Lindsell D, Golding S, Kennedy S (2002) A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20:630–634 Hudelist G, English J, Thomas AE, Tinelli A, Singer CF, Keckstein J (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:257–263 Timmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I (2000) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:500–505 Kennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C et al (2005) ESHRE Special Interest Group for Endometriosis and Endometrium Guideline Development Group. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20:2698–2704 Nama V, Kalu E (2009) Management of endometrioma in women embarking on IVF: paucity of good quality evidence. Fertil Steril 92:e63; author reply e64 Benschop L, Farquhar C, van der Poel N, Heineman MJ (2010) Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008571 Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Cammilli F, Bracco GL, Scarselli G (2008) Endometriosis and infertility. Surgery and ART: an integrated approach for successful management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 138:54–59 Coccia ME, Rizzello F, Mariani G, Bulletti C, Palagiano A, Scarselli G (2011) Ovarian surgery for bilateral endometriomas influences age at menopause. Hum Reprod 26:3000–3007 De Ziegler D, Borghese B, Chapron C (2010) Endometriosis and infertility: pathophysiology and management. Lancet 376:730–738 Busacca M, Marana R, Caruana P et al (1999) Recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after laparoscopic excision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:519–523 Busacca M, Riparini J, Somigliana E et al (2006) Postsurgical ovarian failure after laparoscopic excision of bilateral endometriomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(2):421–425 Koga K, Takemura Y, Osuga Y et al (2006) Recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after laparoscopic excision. Hum Reprod 21:2171–2174 Tsoumpou I, Kyrgiou M, Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG (2009) The effect of surgical treatment for endometrioma on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 92:75–87 Saleh A, Tulandi T (1999) Reoperation after laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas by excision and by fenestration. Fertil Steril 72:322–324 Scully RE (1980) Malignant tumors arising in endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 23:951–963 Van Gorp T, Amant F, Neven P, Vergote I, Moerman P (2004) Endometriosis and the development of malignant tumors of the pelvis. A review of literature. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:349–371 Heilbrun ME, Olpin J, Shaaban A (2009) Imaging of benign adnexal masses: characteristic presentations on ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52:21–39 Griffin N, Grant LA, Sala E (2010) Adnexal masses: characterization and imaging strategies. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 31:330–346 Mais V, Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Angiolucci M, Paoletti AM, Melis GB (1995) Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cystic teratoma. Obstet Gynecol 85:48–52 Valentin L (2004) Use of morphology to characterize and manage common adnexal masses. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:71–89 Canis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Wattiez A, Manhes H, Bruhat MA (1994) Laparoscopic diagnosis of adnexal cystic masses: a 12-year experience with long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 83:707–712 Parker WH, Childers JM, Canis M, Phillips DR, Topel H (1996) Laparoscopic management of benign cystic teratomas during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:1499–1501 Kondo W, Bourdel N, Cotte B, Tran X, Botchorishvili R, Jardon K et al (2010) Does prevention of intraperitoneal spillage when removing a dermoid cyst prevent granulomatous peritonitis? BJOG 117:1027–1030 Salem S, Wilson SR (2005) Gynecologic ultrasound. In: Rumack C, Wilson S, Charboneau SJ (eds) Diagnostic ultrasound, vol 1. pp 527–587 Tulandi T, Akkour K (2012) Role of reproductive surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26:747–755 Cotran RS et al (1999) Robbins pathologic basis of disease, 6th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia Alcazar JL, Errasti T, Minguez JA, Galan MJ, Garcia-Manero M, Ceamanos C (2001) Sonographic features of ovarian Cystadenofibromas. Spectrum of findings. J Ultrasound Med 20:915–919 Walker JJ (2007) Ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 50:89–99 Varma R, Gupta J (2009) Tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clin Evid (Online) 2009. Pii:1406 Farquhar CM (2005) Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 366:583–591 Takai M, Kanemura M, Kawaguchi H et al (2012) Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the intestinal type arising from mature cystic teratoma of the ovary: a rare case report and review of the literature. J Ovarian Res 5:41 Dill-Macky MJ, Atri M (2000) Ovarian sonography. In: Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 857–896 Lev-Toaff AS, Horrow MM, Andreotti RF et al (2009) Expert Panel on Women’s Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® clinically suspected adnexal mass. American College of Radiology, Reston Twickler DM, Moschos E (2010) Ultrasound and assessment of ovarian cancer risk. Am J Roentgenol 194:322–329 Perez-Medina T, Orensanz I, Pereira A et al (2013) Three-dimensional angioultrasonography for the prediction of malignancy in ovarian masses. Gynecol Obstet Invest 75:120–125 Van Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T et al (2007) Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1706–1714 Sokalska A, Timmerman D, Testa AC et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:462–470 Sassone AM, Timor-Tritsch IE, Artner A, Westhoff C, Warren WB (1991) Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. ObstetGynecol 78:70–76 Twickler DM, Forte TB, Santos-Ramos R, McIntire D, Harris P, Miller DS (1999) The ovarian tumor index predicts risk for malignancy. Cancer 86:2280–2290 Ferrazzi E, Zanetta G, Dordoni D, Berlanda N, Mezzopane R, Lissoni AA (1997) Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10:192–197 Aslam N, Banerjee S, Carr JV, Savvas M, Hooper R, Jurkovic D (2000) Prospective evaluation of logistic regression models for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 96:75–80 Valentin L, Hagen B, Tingulstad S, Eik-Nes S (2001) Comparison of “pattern recognition” and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective crossvalidation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:357–365 Mol BW, Boll D, De Kanter M, Heintz AP, Sijmons EA, Oei SG (2001) Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: an external validation of prognostic models. Gynecol Oncol 80:162–167 Van Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Valentin L et al (2007) External validation of mathematical models to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. Clin Cancer Res 13:4440–4447 Geomini P, Kruitwagen R, Bremer GL, Cnossen J, Mol BWJ (2009) The accuracy of risk scores in predicting ovarian malignancy: asystematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113:384–394 Timmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa AC et al (2010) Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:226–234 Timmerman D (2004) The use of mathematical models to evaluate pelvic masses; can they beat an expert operator? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:91–104 Timmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C (2008) Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:681–690 Timmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D et al (2010) Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ 341:c6839 Dodge JE, Covens AL, Lacchetti C et al (2012) Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group. Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline. Curr Oncol 19:244–257 Murta EF, Nomelini RS (2006) Early diagnosis and predictors of malignancy of adnexal masses. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:14–19 Skates SJ, Menon U, MacDonald N, Rosenthal AN, Oram DH, Knapp RC (2003) Calculation of the risk of ovarian cancer from serial CA-125 values for preclinical detection in postmenopausal women. J Clin Oncol 21:206–210 Menon U, Skates SJ, Lewis S, Rosenthal AN, Rufford B, Sibley K (2005) Prospective study using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm to screen for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7919–7926 Lu KH, Skates SJ, Bevers TB, Newland W, Moore RG, Leed L (2010) A prospective U.S. ovarian cancer screening study using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA). J Clin Oncol 28(Suppl):5003 Conflict of interest None of the authors have financial conflicts of interest to report. Author information Authors and Affiliations Corresponding author Rights and permissions About this article Cite this article Coccia, M.E., Rizzello, F., Romanelli, C. et al. Adnexal masses: what is the role of ultrasonographic imaging?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290, 843–854 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3327-0 Received: Accepted: Published: Issue date: DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3327-0