{"paper_id":"5cda91c6-d88b-4ecc-9a1e-1e166d48ba1a","body_text":"Abstract\nPurpose\nAdnexal masses represent a common finding among both premenopausal and postmenopausal women. This article will concentrate on the importance of an accurate preoperative diagnosis of adnexal masses that may be encountered in the course of an assessment of the female pelvis. The ultrasonographic modalities including two-dimensional, Doppler, three-dimensional and real-time four-dimensional approach, the accuracy of the technique, and the role of second-level exam will be discussed.\nMethods\nIn this review, we searched for the most relevant articles on the topic with a special focus on the importance of an accurate preoperative diagnosis of adnexal masses, the different ultrasonographic modalities, and the role of second-level exam.\nResults\nThe primary goal of diagnostic evaluation is to exclude malignancy. Furthermore, differentiation among pelvic masses with non-malignant features is relevant as well since suitable counseling and treatment depend on the suspected histology. Ultrasound represents the first-line modality for assessing adnexal masses and showed a very accurate examination. Ultrasound, performed by experienced operators, is effective in the morphologic evaluation of the adnexal masses and is useful in discriminating between benign and malignant lesions. Second-level exams may include assessment by an experienced ultrasound examiner, magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography.\nConclusion\nUltrasound represents the first-line modality for assessing adnexal masses. Predicting the nature of an adnexal mass is essential regarding counseling, clinical management and surgical planning in such patients. Pattern recognition can accurately diagnose the majority of the benign masses and malignancies.\nSimilar content being viewed by others\nReferences\nLiu J, Zanotti KM (2011) Management of the adnexal mass. Obstet Gynecol 117:1413–1428\nBorgfeldt C, Andolf E (1999) Transvaginal sonographic ovarian findings in a random sample of women 25–40 years old. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:345–350\nHartge P, Hayes R, Reding D et al (2000) Complex ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women are not associated with ovarian cancer risk factors: preliminary data from the prostate, lung, colon, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1232–1237\nCastillo G, Alcázar JL, Jurado M (2004) Natural history of sonographically detected simple unilocular adnexal cysts in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol Oncol 92:965–969\nRoyal College of Obstetrician and Gynaecologists (2010) Ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women. Guideline No. 34 (October 2003 Reviewed 2010)\nBrown DL, Dudiak KM, Laing FC (2010) Adnexal masses: US characterization and reporting. Radiology 254:342–354\nFaschingbauer F, Benz M, Häberle L et al (2012) Subjective assessment of ovarian masses using pattern recognition: the impact of experience on diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285:1663–1669\nJemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ (2007) Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43–66\nGraham L (2008) ACOG releases guidelines on management of adnexal masses. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Am Fam Physician 77:1320–1323\nNIH consensus conference (1995) Ovarian cancer. Screening, treatment, and follow-up. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Ovarian Cancer. JAMA 273:491–497\nJoshi M, Ganesan K, Munshi HN, Ganesan S, Lawande A (2008) Ultrasound of adnexal masses. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 29:72–97\nConway C, Zalud I, Dilena M et al (1998) Simple cyst in the postmenopausal patient: detection and management. J Ultrasound Med 17:369–372\nTesta AC, Bourne TH (2009) Characterising pelvic masses using ultrasound. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23:725–738\nDe Kroon CD, Van der Sandt HA, Van Houwelingen JC, Jansen FW (2004) Sonographic assessment of non-malignant ovarian cysts: does sonohistology exist? Hum Reprod 19:2138–2143\nMcKenna A, Fabres C, Alam V, Morales V (2000) Clinical management of functional ovarian cysts: a prospective and randomized study. Hum Reprod 15:2567–2569\nUpdate Cochrane (2009) Oral contraceptives for functional ovarian cysts. Obstet Gynecol 114:679–680\nSarkar M, Wolf MG (2012) Simple ovarian cysts in postmenopausal women: scope of conservative management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 162:75–78\nVigano P, Parazzini F, Somigliana E, Vercellini P (2004) Endometriosis: epidemiology and aetiological factors. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:177–200\nGiudice LC, Kao LC (2004) Endometriosis. Lancet 364:1789–1799\nFauconnier A, Chapron C (2005) Endometriosis and pelvic pain: epidemiological evidence of the relationship and implications. Hum Reprod Update 11:595–606\nHummelshoj L, Prentice A, Groothuis P (2006) Update on endometriosis. Womens Health (Lond Engl) 2:53–56\nJenkins S, Olive DL, Haney AF (1986) Endometriosis: pathogenetic implications of the anatomic distribution. Obstet Gynecol 67:335–338\nRedwine DB (1999) Ovarian endometriosis: a marker for more extensive pelvic and intestinal disease. Fertil Steril 72:310–315\nMoore J, Copley S, Morris J, Lindsell D, Golding S, Kennedy S (2002) A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of endometriosis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 20:630–634\nHudelist G, English J, Thomas AE, Tinelli A, Singer CF, Keckstein J (2011) Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound for non-invasive diagnosis of bowel endometriosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:257–263\nTimmerman D, Valentin L, Bourne TH, Collins WP, Verrelst H, Vergote I (2000) Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: a consensus opinion from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 16:500–505\nKennedy S, Bergqvist A, Chapron C et al (2005) ESHRE Special Interest Group for Endometriosis and Endometrium Guideline Development Group. ESHRE guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis. Hum Reprod 20:2698–2704\nNama V, Kalu E (2009) Management of endometrioma in women embarking on IVF: paucity of good quality evidence. Fertil Steril 92:e63; author reply e64\nBenschop L, Farquhar C, van der Poel N, Heineman MJ (2010) Interventions for women with endometrioma prior to assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11:CD008571\nCoccia ME, Rizzello F, Cammilli F, Bracco GL, Scarselli G (2008) Endometriosis and infertility. Surgery and ART: an integrated approach for successful management. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 138:54–59\nCoccia ME, Rizzello F, Mariani G, Bulletti C, Palagiano A, Scarselli G (2011) Ovarian surgery for bilateral endometriomas influences age at menopause. Hum Reprod 26:3000–3007\nDe Ziegler D, Borghese B, Chapron C (2010) Endometriosis and infertility: pathophysiology and management. Lancet 376:730–738\nBusacca M, Marana R, Caruana P et al (1999) Recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after laparoscopic excision. Am J Obstet Gynecol 180:519–523\nBusacca M, Riparini J, Somigliana E et al (2006) Postsurgical ovarian failure after laparoscopic excision of bilateral endometriomas. Am J Obstet Gynecol 195(2):421–425\nKoga K, Takemura Y, Osuga Y et al (2006) Recurrence of ovarian endometrioma after laparoscopic excision. Hum Reprod 21:2171–2174\nTsoumpou I, Kyrgiou M, Gelbaya TA, Nardo LG (2009) The effect of surgical treatment for endometrioma on in vitro fertilization outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 92:75–87\nSaleh A, Tulandi T (1999) Reoperation after laparoscopic treatment of ovarian endometriomas by excision and by fenestration. Fertil Steril 72:322–324\nScully RE (1980) Malignant tumors arising in endometriosis. Clin Obstet Gynecol 23:951–963\nVan Gorp T, Amant F, Neven P, Vergote I, Moerman P (2004) Endometriosis and the development of malignant tumors of the pelvis. A review of literature. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:349–371\nHeilbrun ME, Olpin J, Shaaban A (2009) Imaging of benign adnexal masses: characteristic presentations on ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Obstet Gynecol 52:21–39\nGriffin N, Grant LA, Sala E (2010) Adnexal masses: characterization and imaging strategies. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 31:330–346\nMais V, Guerriero S, Ajossa S, Angiolucci M, Paoletti AM, Melis GB (1995) Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of cystic teratoma. Obstet Gynecol 85:48–52\nValentin L (2004) Use of morphology to characterize and manage common adnexal masses. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:71–89\nCanis M, Mage G, Pouly JL, Wattiez A, Manhes H, Bruhat MA (1994) Laparoscopic diagnosis of adnexal cystic masses: a 12-year experience with long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol 83:707–712\nParker WH, Childers JM, Canis M, Phillips DR, Topel H (1996) Laparoscopic management of benign cystic teratomas during pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 174:1499–1501\nKondo W, Bourdel N, Cotte B, Tran X, Botchorishvili R, Jardon K et al (2010) Does prevention of intraperitoneal spillage when removing a dermoid cyst prevent granulomatous peritonitis? BJOG 117:1027–1030\nSalem S, Wilson SR (2005) Gynecologic ultrasound. In: Rumack C, Wilson S, Charboneau SJ (eds) Diagnostic ultrasound, vol 1. pp 527–587\nTulandi T, Akkour K (2012) Role of reproductive surgery in the era of assisted reproductive technology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 26:747–755\nCotran RS et al (1999) Robbins pathologic basis of disease, 6th edn. WB Saunders, Philadelphia\nAlcazar JL, Errasti T, Minguez JA, Galan MJ, Garcia-Manero M, Ceamanos C (2001) Sonographic features of ovarian Cystadenofibromas. Spectrum of findings. J Ultrasound Med 20:915–919\nWalker JJ (2007) Ectopic pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 50:89–99\nVarma R, Gupta J (2009) Tubal ectopic pregnancy. Clin Evid (Online) 2009. Pii:1406\nFarquhar CM (2005) Ectopic pregnancy. Lancet 366:583–591\nTakai M, Kanemura M, Kawaguchi H et al (2012) Mucinous adenocarcinoma of the intestinal type arising from mature cystic teratoma of the ovary: a rare case report and review of the literature. J Ovarian Res 5:41\nDill-Macky MJ, Atri M (2000) Ovarian sonography. In: Ultrasonography in obstetrics and gynecology, 4th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 857–896\nLev-Toaff AS, Horrow MM, Andreotti RF et al (2009) Expert Panel on Women’s Imaging. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® clinically suspected adnexal mass. American College of Radiology, Reston\nTwickler DM, Moschos E (2010) Ultrasound and assessment of ovarian cancer risk. Am J Roentgenol 194:322–329\nPerez-Medina T, Orensanz I, Pereira A et al (2013) Three-dimensional angioultrasonography for the prediction of malignancy in ovarian masses. Gynecol Obstet Invest 75:120–125\nVan Calster B, Timmerman D, Bourne T et al (2007) Discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses by specialist ultrasound examination versus serum CA-125. J Natl Cancer Inst 99:1706–1714\nSokalska A, Timmerman D, Testa AC et al (2009) Diagnostic accuracy of transvaginal ultrasound examination for assigning a specific diagnosis to adnexal masses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:462–470\nSassone AM, Timor-Tritsch IE, Artner A, Westhoff C, Warren WB (1991) Transvaginal sonographic characterization of ovarian disease: evaluation of a new scoring system to predict ovarian malignancy. ObstetGynecol 78:70–76\nTwickler DM, Forte TB, Santos-Ramos R, McIntire D, Harris P, Miller DS (1999) The ovarian tumor index predicts risk for malignancy. Cancer 86:2280–2290\nFerrazzi E, Zanetta G, Dordoni D, Berlanda N, Mezzopane R, Lissoni AA (1997) Transvaginal ultrasonographic characterization of ovarian masses: comparison of five scoring systems in a multicenter study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 10:192–197\nAslam N, Banerjee S, Carr JV, Savvas M, Hooper R, Jurkovic D (2000) Prospective evaluation of logistic regression models for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 96:75–80\nValentin L, Hagen B, Tingulstad S, Eik-Nes S (2001) Comparison of “pattern recognition” and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: a prospective crossvalidation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:357–365\nMol BW, Boll D, De Kanter M, Heintz AP, Sijmons EA, Oei SG (2001) Distinguishing the benign and malignant adnexal mass: an external validation of prognostic models. Gynecol Oncol 80:162–167\nVan Holsbeke C, Van Calster B, Valentin L et al (2007) External validation of mathematical models to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal tumors: a multicenter study by the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis Group. Clin Cancer Res 13:4440–4447\nGeomini P, Kruitwagen R, Bremer GL, Cnossen J, Mol BWJ (2009) The accuracy of risk scores in predicting ovarian malignancy: asystematic review. Obstet Gynecol 113:384–394\nTimmerman D, Van Calster B, Testa AC et al (2010) Ovarian cancer prediction in adnexal masses using ultrasound based logistic regression models: a temporal and external validation study by the IOTA group. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:226–234\nTimmerman D (2004) The use of mathematical models to evaluate pelvic masses; can they beat an expert operator? Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 18:91–104\nTimmerman D, Testa AC, Bourne T, Ameye L, Jurkovic D, Van Holsbeke C (2008) Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:681–690\nTimmerman D, Ameye L, Fischerova D et al (2010) Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ 341:c6839\nDodge JE, Covens AL, Lacchetti C et al (2012) Gynecology Cancer Disease Site Group. Management of a suspicious adnexal mass: a clinical practice guideline. Curr Oncol 19:244–257\nMurta EF, Nomelini RS (2006) Early diagnosis and predictors of malignancy of adnexal masses. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 18:14–19\nSkates SJ, Menon U, MacDonald N, Rosenthal AN, Oram DH, Knapp RC (2003) Calculation of the risk of ovarian cancer from serial CA-125 values for preclinical detection in postmenopausal women. J Clin Oncol 21:206–210\nMenon U, Skates SJ, Lewis S, Rosenthal AN, Rufford B, Sibley K (2005) Prospective study using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm to screen for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7919–7926\nLu KH, Skates SJ, Bevers TB, Newland W, Moore RG, Leed L (2010) A prospective U.S. ovarian cancer screening study using the risk of ovarian cancer algorithm (ROCA). J Clin Oncol 28(Suppl):5003\nConflict of interest\nNone of the authors have financial conflicts of interest to report.\nAuthor information\nAuthors and Affiliations\nCorresponding author\nRights and permissions\nAbout this article\nCite this article\nCoccia, M.E., Rizzello, F., Romanelli, C. et al. Adnexal masses: what is the role of ultrasonographic imaging?. Arch Gynecol Obstet 290, 843–854 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3327-0\nReceived:\nAccepted:\nPublished:\nIssue date:\nDOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-014-3327-0","source_license":"CC0","license_restricted":false}