Predictive approach to the management of women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia
This review summarizes scientific literature on managing endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, finding combined oral contraceptives, particularly those with gestoden, effective for prevention and recurrence reduction.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper analyzes and summarizes (2012–2022) literature on predictive approaches to managing women with endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, using searches across PubMed, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, eLibrary with keywords on pathogenesis, risk factors, and recurrence. It describes that hyperplasia without atypia is common in reproductive-age women and is linked to disrupted local hormonal homeostasis, with risk factors including age over 35, lack of prior pregnancy, obesity, genetic predisposition, diabetes, anovulatory cycles, and certain forms of hormone therapy without a progestin component, as well as immunosuppression; the review highlights the use of predictive medicine for risk identification and targeted follow-up, with an explicit limitation that the evidence is based on literature review rather than new patient-level outcomes. The review concludes that combined oral contraceptives, particularly gestodene-containing formulations, are discussed as having both contraceptive effectiveness and a pathogenetically justified role in prevention of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia and its recurrences, with efficacy described as similar to other progestins such as levonorgestrel. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and/or adenomyosis — it is not specifically focused on endometriosis or adenomyosis, but it relates to endometriosis/adenomyosis only indirectly through broader gynecologic hormone-responsive pelvic disease management themes and shared hormonal risk-pathway concepts, while the condition under review is endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Citation neighborhood (sparse)
Too few in-corpus citations on either side for a chart; here are the lists.
Cites (2)
References (38)
- LNG-IUS versus oral progestogen treatment for endometrial hyperplasia: a long-term comparative cohort study via openalex
- Prediction of Regression and Relapse of Endometrial Hyperplasia With Conservative Therapy via openalex
- W2022987638 via openalex
- W2041440766 via openalex
- W2042549548 via openalex
- W2058917128 via openalex
- W2067208421 via openalex
- W2086934638 via openalex
- W2102928371 via openalex
- W2113190292 via openalex
- W2113435184 via openalex
- W2140040463 via openalex
- W2142447002 via openalex
- W2185449028 via openalex
- W2321934915 via openalex
- W2403881885 via openalex
- W2416692452 via openalex
- W2560857678 via openalex
- W2563855575 via openalex
- W2598319337 via openalex
- W2800573905 via openalex
- W2898922280 via openalex
- W2912672173 via openalex
- W2914340878 via openalex
- W2944477354 via openalex
- W2982439923 via openalex
- W3014455440 via openalex
- W3082935376 via openalex
- W3112233359 via openalex
- W3128646645 via openalex
- W4205558853 via openalex
- W4206298394 via openalex
- W4223523934 via openalex
- W4226278337 via openalex
- W4236913514 via openalex
- W153466153 via openalex
- W4283324442 via openalex
- W1966716045 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00