LAPAROSCOPIC DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOMETRIOSIS-ASSOCIATED INFERTILITY
This study generalized laparoscopic findings of endometriosis-associated infertility, classifying stages and depths to determine the disease's impact on fertility.
One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works
The paper aimed to synthesize laparoscopic findings of genital and extragenital endometriosis in women with infertility and to map these findings to international classification systems to support selection of appropriate interventions. It used a two-stage approach: first, an analysis of studies on R-AFS and Enzian (including EFI-related criteria) with laparoscopic search parameters, and second, a center-based study at “Yuzko Medical Center” involving 42 women undergoing laparoscopic revision, after which diagnoses were assigned using Enzian, R-AFS and an infertility risk assessment was linked to disease depth and spread. The authors report that determining the depth and stage of endometriotic lesions on laparoscopy is crucial for staging and for estimating the index of fertility (EFI), and they describe a direct dependence between infertility risk and lesion depth/spread, with different lesion removal techniques applied according to case characteristics, though the paper does not provide quantitative outcome measures or clear comparative limitations. This paper is centrally about endometriosis — it focuses on laparoscopic diagnosis and staging of endometriosis-associated infertility using R-AFS, Enzian, and EFI frameworks.
Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works
Abstract
Full text
5,962 characters
· extracted from
oa-doi-fallback
· click to expand
Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.
My notes (saved in your browser only)
Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works
Outcome instruments
Condition tags
Citation neighborhood (no data yet)
We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2024) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.
References (21)
- W1960783300 via openalex
- W1964479969 via openalex
- W1970924172 via openalex
- W2013840081 via openalex
- W2025386062 via openalex
- W2027895380 via openalex
- W2038682678 via openalex
- W2110866232 via openalex
- W2130281902 via openalex
- W2146929619 via openalex
- W2159761131 via openalex
- W2199096407 via openalex
- W2206417819 via openalex
- W2304489652 via openalex
- W2594866695 via openalex
- W2625528629 via openalex
- W2788996595 via openalex
- W2802757031 via openalex
- W2947820849 via openalex
- W2993783706 via openalex
- W4221115984 via openalex
Source provenance
- openalex
- last seen: 2026-06-10T17:14:06.276822+00:00