Is there a role for radiofrequency and assisted reproductive technology?

review OA: closed public-domain-us
Full text JSON View on PubMed View at publisher
AI-generated summary by gemini-2.5-flash-lite, 2026-07-20

Transvaginal radiofrequency ablation reduces fibroid volume, preserving uterine anatomy and leading to pregnancy rates comparable to the general population, even in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology.

One-sentence paraphrase of the abstract; not a substitute for reading it. No clinical advice. How this works

AI-generated deep summary by claude@2026-06, 2026-06-11 · read from full text

This paper is a review of the evidence on transvaginal radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) for uterine fibroids and adenomyosis in infertile women, focusing on efficacy, safety, and feasibility as a fertility-preserving alternative to myomectomy. The review reports that TRFA induces coagulative necrosis of fibroid tissue with about a 60–70% reduction in fibroid volume within 1 year while preserving uterine anatomy, and that reported pregnancy rates using either spontaneous conception or assisted reproductive techniques are comparable to those of the general population. It also notes that large clinical series have not reported uterine rupture or major obstetric complications attributable to TRFA, and that larger initial fibroid volume may prolong time to conception due to longer resorption. This paper is centrally about endometriosis and/or adenomyosis — it specifically addresses adenomyosis among the indications for TRFA in infertile women.

Read from the paper's body, not the abstract. Not a substitute for reading the paper. No clinical advice. How this works

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this study is to review the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of transvaginal radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) for the treatment of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis in infertile women, and to assess its feasibility as a fertility-preserving alternative to myomectomy. RECENT FINDINGS: TRFA induces coagulative necrosis of fibroid tissue, achieving a 60-70% reduction in fibroid volume within 1 year while preserving uterine anatomy. Recent studies report pregnancy rates comparable to those of the general population, achieved through both spontaneous conception and assisted reproductive techniques. Large clinical series show no cases of uterine rupture or major obstetric complications attributable to the procedure. Initial fibroid volume appears to be a key determinant of time to conception, with larger fibroids requiring longer resorption periods. SUMMARY: TRFA is a safe, minimally invasive technique that preserves uterine integrity and offers obstetric outcomes comparable to those of the general population. It represents an effective option to optimize the uterine environment prior to pregnancy, particularly in women with intramural fibroids.
Full text 2,350 characters · extracted from oa-doi-fallback · click to expand
Correspondence to María Cerrillo, MD, IVIRMA Madrid Global Research Alliance, Av Talgo 68, CP 28023, Madrid, Spain, Tel: +34 911 809 000; e-mail: [email protected] Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology 38(3):p 147-153, June 2026. | DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000001097 The purpose of this study is to review the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of transvaginal radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) for the treatment of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis in infertile women, and to assess its feasibility as a fertility-preserving alternative to myomectomy. Recent findings TRFA induces coagulative necrosis of fibroid tissue, achieving a 60–70% reduction in fibroid volume within 1 year while preserving uterine anatomy. Recent studies report pregnancy rates comparable to those of the general population, achieved through both spontaneous conception and assisted reproductive techniques. Large clinical series show no cases of uterine rupture or major obstetric complications attributable to the procedure. Initial fibroid volume appears to be a key determinant of time to conception, with larger fibroids requiring longer resorption periods. Summary TRFA is a safe, minimally invasive technique that preserves uterine integrity and offers obstetric outcomes comparable to those of the general population. It represents an effective option to optimize the uterine environment prior to pregnancy, particularly in women with intramural fibroids. Plain Language SummaryThis review examined how effective and safe transvaginal radiofrequency ablation (TRFA) is for treating uterine fibroids and adenomyosis in infertile women, and whether it can serve as a fertility-preserving alternative to myomectomy. TRFA works by inducing coagulative necrosis in fibroid tissue and achieves about a 60–70% reduction in fibroid volume within 1 year while maintaining uterine anatomy. Reported pregnancy rates, via both spontaneous conception and assisted reproductive techniques, are similar to those of the general population, with no uterine ruptures or major obstetric complications linked to TRFA. Larger initial fibroid volume may delay conception, but overall TRFA offers a safe, minimally invasive option to optimize the uterus before pregnancy, especially in women with intramural fibroids. Text is machine generated and may contain inaccuracies. FAQ

Text is read by the "Ask this paper" AI Q&A widget below. Extraction quality varies by source — PMC NXML preserves structure cleanly, OA-HTML may include some navigation residue, and OA-PDF can have broken hyphenation. The publisher copy (via DOI) is the canonical version.

My notes (saved in your browser only)

Ask this paper AI returns verbatim quotes from the full text · source: oa-doi-fallback

Answers must be backed by verbatim quotes from this paper's full text. Hallucinated quotes are dropped automatically; if no verbatim passage answers the question, we say so. How this works

Condition tags

adenomyosis

MeSH descriptors

Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis Adenomyosis

Citation neighborhood (no data yet)

We don't have any in-corpus citations linked to this paper yet. This is a recent paper (2026) — citers typically take a year or two to land, and the OpenAlex reference graph may still be filling in.

Source provenance

europepmc
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:14:40.014199+00:00
pubmed
last seen: 2026-09-05T06:10:15.346066+00:00
unpaywall
last seen: 2026-09-04T06:34:25.427880+00:00
License: public-domain-us · commercial use OK · attribution required
Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine